Hush Companions
Toronto Escorts

Don Cherry is our Martin Luther King

Previous Thread Next Thread
B

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
bver_hunter said:
If Catherine Mckenna's office was about vandalism then I am pointing it out and how you threw Antifa demonstrations etc into the mix, as if to make an excuse for it!!

We know that Antifa are not as violent as the Far Right, but anyway you used them as an excuse, otherwise, I do not know what your point was then!!
Click to expand...
So you didn’t know what my point was but in typical leftist fashion you go on the attack and assume something that fits your narrative.
Why do you keep bringing up the vandalism to her office? Do you assume that it was a right winger who did this? If so why?
 
bver_hunter

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,469
5,655
113
Boober69 said:
So you didn’t know what my point was but in typical leftist fashion you go on the attack and assume something that fits your narrative.
Why do you keep bringing up the vandalism to her office? Do you assume that it was a right winger who did this? If so why?
Click to expand...
You in typical right wing fashion throws Antifa from the USA into the mix when a thread of the vandalization of McKenna's office was posted. What have Antifa's various demonstrations etc. got to do with this vandalism?? Unless you are making excuses for it!!

Anyway, this was also your logic about the spray painting monuments being "fine", is exactly what happened to McKenna's office. Just bringing that that to your attention as it was exactly the same logic!! But now you consider that as an "attack" on you as you cannot accept the facts. You ask me why I keep on bringing up Mckenna's office vandalism. But it is okay to discuss Ford's carbon sticker peeling off as being a big issue to you!!
 
B

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
bver_hunter said:
You in typical right wing fashion throws Antifa from the USA into the mix when a thread of the vandalization of McKenna's office was posted. What have Antifa's various demonstrations etc. got to do with this vandalism?? Unless you are making excuses for it!!

Anyway, this was also your logic about the spray painting monuments being "fine", is exactly what happened to McKenna's office. Just bringing that that to your attention as it was exactly the same logic!! But now you consider that as an "attack" on you as you cannot accept the facts. You ask me why I keep on bringing up Mckenna's office vandalism. But it is okay to discuss Ford's carbon sticker peeling off as being a big issue to you!!
Click to expand...
When did I say spray painting a monument was fine?
You have a penchant for misquoting me...is that because you really have no argument?

Are you perhaps if the belief that if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth?
If not, then why are you doing it?

I brought up Antifa when it was suggested that right wingers were somehow responsible for her office being vandalized. My point was that vandalism extends to leftists as well so one can equally assume it could have been a leftist who did it.

I also suggested that it could have been anyone for whatever reason.

And yes any kind of vandalism is not justified whether it’s her office or peeling off stickers. What’s you point?
 
bver_hunter

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,469
5,655
113
Boober69 said:
When did I say spray painting a monument was fine?
You have a penchant for misquoting me...is that because you really have no argument?

Are you perhaps if the belief that if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth?
If not, then why are you doing it?

I brought up Antifa when it was suggested that right wingers were somehow responsible for her office being vandalized. My point was that vandalism extends to leftists as well so one can equally assume it could have been a leftist who did it.

I also suggested that it could have been anyone for whatever reason.

And yes any kind of vandalism is not justified whether it’s her office or peeling off stickers. What’s you point?
Click to expand...
You are the one that has the penchant for misquoting me. Look at exactly what I stated when you came up with this statement:

Boober69 said:
Well then I would say the spray painting a monument for political protest is fine based on your logic?
Click to expand...
Then all I did was to add this part of it:

bver_hunter said:
Just like spray painting of feminism graffiti on Catherine McKenna's office was fine
Click to expand...
Which was in pure jest. But it ruffled your feathers!!

Then you go on and on about lies and repeating it etc. Total codswallop from you!!

But you are comparing apples with pears when you threw the Antifa into the mix. Why do you try to protect the extreme right who are the most violent individuals and have been responsible for killings etc in the USA??

But look at the way the extreme right are targeting McKenna:

https://www.macleans.ca/politics/ottawa/why-would-anyone-hate-catherine-mckenna/

Definitely not a "leftist" that could have been responsible for that vandalization of her office. The derogatory name calling language used is typical of the extreme right. Period!!

My post is that you were questioning why I was bringing up McKenna's office vandalization on a constant basis. But is it not hypocritical when you are doing even more of the same for those Doug Ford Politicized Anti-Carbon Tax stickers???
 
B

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
bver_hunter said:
You are the one that has the penchant for misquoting me. Look at exactly what I stated when you came up with this statement:



Then all I did was to add this part of it:



Which was in pure jest. But it ruffled your feathers!!

Then you go on and on about lies and repeating it etc. Total codswallop from you!!

But you are comparing apples with pears when you threw the Antifa into the mix. Why do you try to protect the extreme right who are the most violent individuals and have been responsible for killings etc in the USA??

But look at the way the extreme right are targeting McKenna:

https://www.macleans.ca/politics/ottawa/why-would-anyone-hate-catherine-mckenna/

Definitely not a "leftist" that could have been responsible for that vandalization of her office. The derogatory name calling language used is typical of the extreme right. Period!!

My post is that you were questioning why I was bringing up McKenna's office vandalization on a constant basis. But is it not hypocritical when you are doing even more of the same for those Doug Ford Politicized Anti-Carbon Tax stickers???
Click to expand...
Pure jest?
Is that your excuse?

Then consider my statement pure jest as well.

You also assume too much. McKenna's office could have been vandalized by anyone. But your bias leads you to be certain that it was someone with alt-right beliefs. You have zero proof of that but make assumptions to fit your own narrative.

If your pal Frankfooter wasn't denying that peeling off those stickers was vandalism I wouldn't need to keep educating him. No one is denying her office was vandalized. That is the difference here. Try to follow the context.
 
B

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
Frankfooter said:
So if the government decides to put up political propaganda on someone else's property, you think that's fine?
If Trudeau put up stickers over gas stations through the rest of the country, you'd defend those as well, right?
Click to expand...
Regardless if me or anyone else would or wouldn't like them, it would still be vandalism if they were ripped off. It would be against the law. Period. Breaking the law because you don't like the law is not a justified reason to break the law.

Somehow you can't muster up enough brain cells to grasp that simple concept can you?
 
bver_hunter

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,469
5,655
113
Boober69 said:
Pure jest?
Is that your excuse?

Then consider my statement pure jest as well.

You also assume too much. McKenna's office could have been vandalized by anyone. But your bias leads you to be certain that it was someone with alt-right beliefs. You have zero proof of that but make assumptions to fit your own narrative.

If your pal Frankfooter wasn't denying that peeling off those stickers was vandalism I wouldn't need to keep educating him. No one is denying her office was vandalized. That is the difference here. Try to follow the context.
Click to expand...
If it was pure jest on your part, then getting outraged contradicts this fact. You are hilarious!!

McKenna's office is not going to get vandalized by the left, and no way with any disgusting feminist slurs. But your response to bring up the Antifa for their actions in the US was ridiculous and childish.

If you are not denying that her office was vandalized then that response with the ANTIFA was not a reflection of that fact!! But you cannot even follow the context of that statement of yours about spray painting of that monument and how it matched Mckenna's Office vandalization. What is the difference between the two??
 
B

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
bver_hunter said:
If it was pure jest on your part, then getting outraged contradicts this fact. You are hilarious!!

McKenna's office is not going to get vandalized by the left, and no way with any disgusting feminist slurs. But your response to bring up the Antifa for their actions in the US was ridiculous and childish.

If you are not denying that her office was vandalized then that response with the ANTIFA was not a reflection of that fact!! But you cannot even follow the context of that statement of yours about spray painting of that monument and how it matched Mckenna's Office vandalization. What is the difference between the two??
Click to expand...
How do you know for a fact who would and who wouldn’t be capable of vandalizing her office? What if it was a bunch of teenage hoodlums who have no political leanings whatsoever?
You have no idea but claim you do.

If the pump stickers are considered political propaganda as has been suggested, then following that logic, how would vandalizing those be any different than her office being spray painted? Frankfooter believes that vandalizing political propaganda is justified.
You and him should discuss that during your next bubble bath session.
 
bver_hunter

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,469
5,655
113
Boober69 said:
How do you know for a fact who would and who wouldn’t be capable of vandalizing her office? What if it was a bunch of teenage hoodlums who have no political leanings whatsoever?
You have no idea but claim you do.

If the pump stickers are considered political propaganda as has been suggested, then following that logic, how would vandalizing those be any different than her office being spray painted? Frankfooter believes that vandalizing political propaganda is justified.
You and him should discuss that during your next bubble bath session.
Click to expand...
These were hate graffiti that was sprayed on her office. But you just go on trying to blame some "teenage hoodlums". Why did the hoodlums not do the same to the Conservative or NDP candidates in her riding??

But she has been the target of these type of slurs before:

At one point, someone yelled "Fuck you, Climate Barbie" at her while she was with her children (she has three: two girls and a boy).
Click to expand...
https://www.refinery29.com/en-ca/catherine-mckenna-interview-campaign-office-vandalism

Does not attacks on climate Change sound familiar to you as to the political affiliations of the perpetrators of these slurs??

But do not worry as the cops are still investigating this crime. I do not think that they are doing the same for the Trudeau Sexual assaults against the minors that you preposterously posted!!
 
Z

Zaibetter

Banned
Mar 27, 2016
4,284
1
0
Frankfooter said:
Don Cherry, once popular is now backed only by the zailbetters of Canada.
How far they fall.
Click to expand...
LOL Cherry is backed by most Canadians, as usual you're out of touch, its you Jihadists that hate him. Poor Franky never in touch with Canadian values...but he loves those guys in the UK that were burning poppies.
 
B

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
bver_hunter said:
These were hate graffiti that was sprayed on her office. But you just go on trying to blame some "teenage hoodlums". Why did the hoodlums not do the same to the Conservative or NDP candidates in her riding??

But she has been the target of these type of slurs before:



https://www.refinery29.com/en-ca/catherine-mckenna-interview-campaign-office-vandalism

Does not attacks on climate Change sound familiar to you as to the political affiliations of the perpetrators of these slurs??

But do not worry as the cops are still investigating this crime. I do not think that they are doing the same for the Trudeau Sexual assaults against the minors that you preposterously posted!!
Click to expand...
haha...I didn't realize that the slur "C*nt" was reserved for only right wing vandals to be able to spray paint on a window.
Again, pure assumption and biased speculation on your part. Twisting a situation to follow your narrative. Not working, sorry.
You can do better, I know you can.

Even McKenna thought it was teenagers based on the article you shared! Not once did she mention any right wingers potentially doing it.

It's just your vivid imagination I guess.
 
bver_hunter

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,469
5,655
113
Boober69 said:
haha...I didn't realize that the slur "C*nt" was reserved for only right wing vandals to be able to spray paint on a window.
Again, pure assumption and biased speculation on your part. Twisting a situation to follow your narrative. Not working, sorry.
You can do better, I know you can.

Even McKenna thought it was teenagers based on the article you shared! Not once did she mention any right wingers potentially doing it.

It's just your vivid imagination I guess.
Click to expand...
The left are not likely to post slurs on a Liberal candidate. We have seen the right wingers being charged for similar offences in the past. It is very likely to be a right winger, but you rushed to throw ANTIFA in the mix. You, like the rest of the right wingers will always defend the actions of the extreme right wing by stating how bad the ANTIFA is. No it definitely does not work!!

Yes, McKenna thought that it might have been a teenager. But do you think that teenagers do not have political views?? Anyway, her Mother categorically stated that it was not a teenager and very likely to be an adult. Hilarious, that you talk about "vivid imagination' when you start some random threads from alt right wing sources with zero proof relating to sexual allegations. Now you want proof here?? :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
B

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
bver_hunter said:
The left are not likely to post slurs on a Liberal candidate. We have seen the right wingers being charged for similar offences in the past. It is very likely to be a right winger, but you rushed to throw ANTIFA in the mix. You, like the rest of the right wingers will always defend the actions of the extreme right wing by stating how bad the ANTIFA is. No it definitely does not work!!

Yes, McKenna thought that it might have been a teenager. But do you think that teenagers do not have political views?? Anyway, her Mother categorically stated that it was not a teenager and very likely to be an adult. Hilarious, that you talk about "vivid imagination' when you start some random threads from alt right wing sources with zero proof relating to sexual allegations. Now you want proof here?? :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Right-wing teenagers are coming to get you!!! hahah that's hilarious.

Her mom thought it was an adult? hahaha That's what you are basing your accusation that it must have been a right-winger on? Neither of them even hinted that it could be politically driven most likely because if it was, then there would probably be something spray painted to that effect. It was one word.

Personally, based on the evidence before us, I think it was a Liberal woman-hater who works at Home Depot. Why else use "Liberal red" colour for that?
My proof is as good as yours. Feel free to challenge me...or ask McKenna's mom to defend your position. haha OMFG!

Besides, right-wingers don't think she's a c*nt, they think she's a nut. Further proof for you.
 
F

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,698
17,860
113
Zaibetter said:
LOL Cherry is backed by most Canadians, as usual you're out of touch, its you Jihadists that hate him. Poor Franky never in touch with Canadian values...but he loves those guys in the UK that were burning poppies.
Click to expand...
Just like Bernier?
 
bver_hunter

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,469
5,655
113
Boober69 said:
Right-wing teenagers are coming to get you!!! hahah that's hilarious.

Her mom thought it was an adult? hahaha That's what you are basing your accusation that it must have been a right-winger on? Neither of them even hinted that it could be politically driven most likely because if it was, then there would probably be something spray painted to that effect. It was one word.

Personally, based on the evidence before us, I think it was a Liberal woman-hater who works at Home Depot. Why else use "Liberal red" colour for that?
My proof is as good as yours. Feel free to challenge me...or ask McKenna's mom to defend your position. haha OMFG!

Besides, right-wingers don't think she's a c*nt, they think she's a nut. Further proof for you.
Click to expand...
You think these are kids who did it..... no, no, maybe Antifa because see those "numerous links" of what they did in the USA..... such violent guys. Bahahahaha!!!

Then you open a thread of these underage ladies that were "sexually assaulted" by Trudeau based on a tweet. But that was supposed to be a "fact" according to Boober. Then you boast that you have evidence that it will be revealed "soon". "Just be patient".

So, how many seconds / minutes / hours / years / centuries do we have to wait for "soon" to be revealed?? These are supposed to be your facts. Maybe that "Home Depot Liberal woman-hater" will be the victim. Bahahahahaha!!
 
B

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
bver_hunter said:
You think these are kids who did it..... no, no, maybe Antifa because see those "numerous links" of what they did in the USA..... such violent guys. Bahahahaha!!!

Then you open a thread of these underage ladies that were "sexually assaulted" by Trudeau based on a tweet. But that was supposed to be a "fact" according to Boober. Then you boast that you have evidence that it will be revealed "soon". "Just be patient".

So, how many seconds / minutes / hours / years / centuries do we have to wait for "soon" to be revealed?? These are supposed to be your facts. Maybe that "Home Depot Liberal woman-hater" will be the victim. Bahahahahaha!!
Click to expand...
haha changing the subject is a clear sign you have no argument.
You just keep repeating things referring to other posts rather than being able to provide logical arguments.

You assumed it was right wingers who vandalized her office without a shred of evidence.
Kinda desperate and zero integrity.

But keep changing the subject if that’s your only defence mechanism.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Ashley Madison
Previous Thread Next Thread
Toronto Escorts
Top Bottom