Toronto Escorts

Ottawa Citizen story - brothel on Pretoria.

spud271

Active member
Nov 17, 2008
226
62
28
This is not a good scenario at all. I would suspect it was indeed other spas playing games. They all do it, and have for years. Ottawa is a very dirty market.
 

withpassion

Well-known member
Apr 6, 2012
1,463
185
63
Relax people! If it is her place, she has no worries. She's not living off of the avails, she is just renting space and as long as she not getting a per client rate, she will be fine.
 

JohnnyFever

Well-known member
Apr 19, 2018
465
407
63
I'm glad she won't get busted, but I would never under any circumstance visit a location written up in the Citizen, and I suspect I'm not the only one. I can just imagine some angry Glebite catching all the "pervs" going in and out on camera.

Sad story, for sure.
 

Gurney

Active member
Feb 7, 2018
222
161
43
For sure you'll see some crazies filming every one going near...

The Glebe, crazy place for crazy peoples. They don't even like when there is shows close to them. They complain to police it's too noisy etc. lol
 

Robt85

Member
Apr 18, 2013
126
0
18
It appears that Hunter has publicly stated how humorous this situation is and appears genuinely pleased that this would happen to the space that appears to have been provided to "sensualists" as a safe place.

This city has a contingent of providers who are jealous, vindictive and will go to any lengths to shut down other ladies. Sad, truly sad.
 

BillReid451

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2014
405
279
63
It appears that Hunter has publicly stated how humorous this situation is and appears genuinely pleased that this would happen to the space that appears to have been provided to "sensualists" as a safe place.

This city has a contingent of providers who are jealous, vindictive and will go to any lengths to shut down other ladies. Sad, truly sad.
She also posted that she's about to get married and that her fiance only wants her to see regulars from now on? Is this dude a cuck or something? I give this marriage 6 months ......tops. This woman is a headcase.
 

MidGuyy

Member
Jun 11, 2019
106
1
18
She also posted that she's about to get married and that her fiance only wants her to see regulars from now on? Is this dude a cuck or something? I give this marriage 6 months ......tops. This woman is a headcase.
Staying as a regular to some girl who’s about to get married is something I wouldn’t personally recommend. I know each provider is different but you don’t know him nor do you know the type of relationship they have. There’s a very good chance that whatever info she has on you, he has and that could easily be a recipe for disaster. You’re marrying a SW ok that’s all cool. But you mean to tell me you wouldn’t wanna atleast know who she’s sleeping with? Clearly you do know if you are regulating who she sees. Anyway just not a risk I would wanna take.
 

Robt85

Member
Apr 18, 2013
126
0
18
Staying as a regular to some girl who’s about to get married is something I wouldn’t personally recommend. I know each provider is different but you don’t know him nor do you know the type of relationship they have. There’s a very good chance that whatever info she has on you, he has and that could easily be a recipe for disaster. You’re marrying a SW ok that’s all cool. But you mean to tell me you wouldn’t wanna atleast know who she’s sleeping with? Clearly you do know if you are regulating who she sees. Anyway just not a risk I would wanna take.
Exactly!! As far as I am concerned, the fact that he has put on this restriction scares the shit out of me. The risk of info-sharing between the two in order to respect the boundaries of "regulars only" raises many, many red flags. Bye Bye Hunter, I will NEVER see you again and hope the hell you have destroyed any and all information and contact details you have for me.
 

medalllione

Well-known member
Jan 6, 2011
725
461
63
Hunter had a major Twitter war with the owner of this place a few months back. Blocked a whole bunch of people who only expressed some opinion that she didn't like, no matter how mild.
I just realized I am blocked on her Twitter feed. Never expressed an opinion on her. Wondering if anyone on Terb got blocked proactively.
 

Meaning

Well-known member
Oct 21, 2019
392
325
63
How does making it illegal to buy services protect the SW?
The argument is it limits market potential. By shrinking the market (less buyers, since it is now illegal), there is no market for the potential SW to sell her services to, which would incentive her to find other sources of income other than SW.
 

RockNRollMachin

Active member
Aug 8, 2019
488
172
43
The argument is it limits market potential. By shrinking the market (less buyers, since it is now illegal), there is no market for the potential SW to sell her services to, which would incentive her to find other sources of income other than SW.
And it ends up forcing SW to work more in the shadow, thus further unregulating this industry. Imo, this law is actually detrimental to both customers (obviously) and to SW.
 

Meaning

Well-known member
Oct 21, 2019
392
325
63
And it ends up forcing SW to work more in the shadow, thus further unregulating this industry. Imo, this law is actually detrimental to both customers (obviously) and to SW.
I'm not in disagreement with you - was simply explaining the logic the courts hold behind the ruling to OP.
 

MidGuyy

Member
Jun 11, 2019
106
1
18
And it ends up forcing SW to work more in the shadow, thus further unregulating this industry. Imo, this law is actually detrimental to both customers (obviously) and to SW.
It’s not just your opinion. It’s a fact and SW’s will tell you that themselves.
 

RockNRollMachin

Active member
Aug 8, 2019
488
172
43
The new laws actually permit SW's to pool their resources together and get a common workplace from which they can operate. The only way that the residents can get the place removed is if there are any municipal zoning laws against operating places of business inside residential areas, or some such thing. There are no longer any "common bawdy house" or "living off the avails" laws anymore, they've all been struck down.

A common workplace is why massage spas have become so popular, the law recognizes that SW's banding together makes it safer for each other. Now, in the case of "living off the avails", it could be argued that spa owners would fit this definition. But the interpretation of "living off the avails" when it existed, were so broad you could argue that a SW's child or spouse could be charged, because they are benefiting from the SW's income. Even advertisers who took SW ads could've been charged with living off the avails. But obviously, the living off the avails laws were intended to keep pimping under control, now the pimping is taken care of by human trafficking laws. Also SW's can hire body guards now too, so that function of pimping is out the window.

In a lot of ways, the new laws are pretty progressive towards SW's. However, they are downright regressive towards clients. And the laws are schizophrenic. How can something be legal to sell, but illegal to buy?
Thanks for the clarification. I didn't think about these better aspects regarding the legal ability for escorts to share common workplace for instance.

But yea, as you said, this law is pretty schizophrenic. It all make sense though ; we live in a clown world after all.
 

JohnnyFever

Well-known member
Apr 19, 2018
465
407
63
Legal semantics aside, this is about exposure. The last thing any potential client wants is a press story and the NIMBY crowd looking to keep the sex trade out of their neighborhood. I can't imagine how that location could ever be viable now, for any of the providers working there.
 

JohnnyFever

Well-known member
Apr 19, 2018
465
407
63
Having looked at the place on Google Maps, it looks like this place is located in a mini-mall near a veterinary clinic and an ethnic grocery store, among other things. They can't complain that this is a residential place, as it's obviously a commercial building. Also across the street from it, seems to be the backside of a bigger grocery store (with no windows on that side), so it's not like as if there are residents across the street being forced to watch as perverts go into this place and corrupting their children. I mean these people would have to go out of their way just to see customers going into this place! Besides why aren't the children traumatized by the sight of grocery shoppers, and pet owners?

Now, that I've seen all of this I'm absolutely convinced these Glebites are going be utterly defeated if they try to do anything about it. They should just quit now, the days of just calling out "common bawdy house" aren't here anymore.
They don't need to "do" anything. The legality is really irrelevant, that location is now a known sex worker location. That means that discretion is impossible there, which permanently crosses it off the list for anyone concerned about that.
 

cheektocheek

Well-known member
Mar 25, 2004
1,032
169
63
OTTAWA
www.ottawasenators.com
If the person who tipped off the media hadn't then Glebites may never have found out I know of 3 other locations in the Glebe where there is sex work activity going on and guess what Glebeites have not made a fuss over the guess nobody called a snoopy reporter to give them a scoop to help with a vendetta

so it's easy to see this was done with a malicious intent
 
Toronto Escorts