The Porn Dude
Toronto Escorts

Scheer’s favourability rating dropped, while Singh’s rose, Mainstream polls show

Charlemagne

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2017
15,451
2,484
113
Scheer’s favourability rating dropped during campaign, while Singh’s rose, Mainstreet polling shows

By Rachel Emmanuel. Published on Oct 18, 2019 3:55pm

Andrew Scheer’s favourability numbers have tumbled over the course of this election campaign, while NDP leader Jagmeet Singh’s have jumped, new polling numbers from Mainstream Research for iPolitics suggest.

Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau’s favourability rating has been essentially stagnant over that time, according to these survey figures.

In Mainstreet’s Sept. 14 polling numbers, the Conservative leader was found “very unfavourable” by 29.8 per cent of voters. But in results from the firm’s daily tracking poll on Oct. 17, that number hiked to 38.6 per cent, while the number of voters who found Scheer “very favourable” remained constant, dropping slightly from 18.3 per cent in mid-September to 17.7 per cent on Thursday.

The margin of error for Thursday’s results, which captured the opinions of 2,128 voters between Oct. 14 and Oct. 16, is plus or minus 2.12 percentage points.

Throughout the campaign, the Conservative leader has been scrutinized for his views on same-sex marriage, abortion rights and for holding dual U.S. and Canadian citizenship. As well, Scheer was forced to go on the defence when the Globe and Mail reported that he had never completed his insurance accreditation, despite the Conservative party’s website saying the leader had worked as an insurance broker.

Scheer later clarified, saying, “I did receive my accreditation. I left the insurance office before the licensing process was finalized.”

Those who found Scheer “somewhat favourable” moved from 23.9 per cent to 18.9 per cent from mid-September to Oct. 17, while those who found Scheer “somewhat unfavourable” moved 19.3 per cent to 20.3 per cent. The voting population who said they were “unsure” of the leader moved from 8.7 per cent to 4.5 per cent.

Trudeau’s leadership ratings have remained stable despite the blackface/brownface controversy.Trudeau was found “very unfavourable” by 35.5 per cent of the voting population on Sept. 14, which dropped only to 34.9 per cent on Thursday, over a month later. Those who found the Liberal leader “very favourable” remained at 19.5 per cent, while those who found him “somewhat favourable” jumped from 25 per cent to 26 per cent for the same time period. Those who found Trudeau “somewhat unfavourable” rose from 16 per cent to 17 per cent, while those who were “unsure” moved from four per cent to 2.7 per cent.

The campaign period has been advantageous for NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh, who was found “very favourable” by only 7.6 per cent of the voting population on Sept. 14, though this number jumped to 22.3 per cent Thursday. Another 24.8 per cent found Singh “very unfavourable” in September, dropping to 16.8 per cent as the campaign nears its end.

The NDP has been rising in popularitysince the start of the election campaign, and Singh was praised for focusing on Canadians who have experienced racism when images of Trudeau dressed in black/brownface were published by Time Magazine, rather than merely passing judgment on the Liberal leader.

Green Party Leader Elizabeth May and PPC leader Maxime Bernier also dropped in popularity. May was found “very unfavourable” by 22.7 per cent of the voting population in mid-September, which rose to 26.5 per cent in Thursday’s figures. Those who find the Green leader “very favourable” remained relatively constant, beginning at 13.7 per cent and rising to 14.8 per cent.

Bernier was found “very unfavourable” by 42.5 per cent of respondents in September, but that rose to 51.9 per cent in Thursday’s numbers. Those who said the PPC leader is “very favourable” dropped from 6.6 per cent to 5.4 per cent.

Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-Francois Blanchet shot up in popularity over the campaign. He was seen as “very favourable” by 17.9 per cent of the population in mid-September but in Thursday’s figures, that number stood at 31.5 per cent.

Those who found the Bloc leader “very unfavourable” dropped from 22.1 per cent to 12.3 per cent.

Voters head to the polls Monday.

https://ipolitics.ca/2019/10/18/scheers-favourability-rating-dropped-during-campaign-while-singhs-rose-mainstreet-polling-shows/
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,486
5,675
113
But, but conil is insisting that his poll by the most "honourable" anti-Trudeau Toronto Sun, gives Baby Scheer the most seats. Well maybe a majority as well. He is going to be disappointed now, and will probably try to get Spencer Fernando to justify his cause!!
 

whiteshaft

Been Around
Mar 15, 2014
1,783
251
83
Room 38DD
Scheer’s favourability rating dropped during campaign, while Singh’s rose, Mainstreet polling shows
Actually many people are currently quite impressed by Singh in the way he handles himself including myself.
Scheer and Justin certainly have a lot to improve in this area.
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
Actually many people are currently quite impressed by Singh in the way he handles himself including myself.
Scheer and Justin certainly have a lot to improve in this area.
Too bad his brother doesn't handle himself quite the same...

 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
Please post the source that claimed that it is Jagmeet Singh's brother in that photo!!
So let me understand this...you don’t believe it’s from a credible source and your only argument is a challenge as to the source?
So if I provide you with a source then what?

Unless you have been living under a rock and never heard about this then how about doing your own research as a simple internet search will provide your highness with all the sources you need.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,486
5,675
113
So let me understand this...you don’t believe it’s from a credible source and your only argument is a challenge as to the source?
So if I provide you with a source then what?

Unless you have been living under a rock and never heard about this then how about doing your own research as a simple internet search will provide your highness with all the sources you need.
That was from 12 years ago, and he has since apologized for it. I wanted to see how your sources are blasting him for what he did then. Now you get the gist.

But let me show you a more recent one of him that your source will probably not go there:

https://toronto.citynews.ca/video/2...singh-praised-for-response-to-racist-remarks/

This was a far more valiant one of him!!
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
That was from 12 years ago, and he has since apologized for it. I wanted to see how your sources are blasting him for what he did then. Now you get the gist.

But let me show you a more recent one of him that your source will probably not go there:

https://toronto.citynews.ca/video/2...singh-praised-for-response-to-racist-remarks/

This was a far more valiant one of him!!
Do 12 years ago is your excuse? So how much time in your opinion needs to go by before something doesn’t matter?
In your last post your tone suggested that this story could not be true...but it was.
Now you’re rushing to offer a defence?
Boy your heroes seam to apologize a lot...when they’re caught of course.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,486
5,675
113
Do 12 years ago is your excuse? So how much time in your opinion needs to go by before something doesn’t matter?
In your last post your tone suggested that this story could not be true...but it was.
Now you’re rushing to offer a defence?
Boy your heroes seam to apologize a lot...when they’re caught of course.
Well you did not get a gist of why I asked you. But still let's see your source, whether they are bringing it up now or if this was something you pulled up from 12 years ago.
What does his brother's actions have to do with him?? Signs of desperation from the right wingers!!

We can talk about Doug Ford and his family's kind of shady history, and you right wingers will call it foul!!
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
Well you did not get a gist of why I asked you. But still let's see your source, whether they are bringing it up now or if this was something you pulled up from 12 years ago.
What does his brother's actions have to do with him?? Signs of desperation from the right wingers!!

We can talk about Doug Ford and his family's kind of shady history, and you right wingers will call it foul!!
If you actually read my original post I said to bad his brother doesn’t conduct himself in the same way.
Your rage is blinding you.
So you can and have gone back years about the Fords and I can’t for someone else?
Haha typical Leftist hypocrisy.
Btw also interesting that I can offer pictures and you still dispute and defend! OMFG that’s hilarious.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,486
5,675
113
If you actually read my original post I said to bad his brother doesn’t conduct himself in the same way.
Your rage is blinding you.
So you can and have gone back years about the Fords and I can’t for someone else?
Haha typical Leftist hypocrisy.
Btw also interesting that I can offer pictures and you still dispute and defend! OMFG that’s hilarious.
Why bring his brother in the mix?? You make it seem like a present tense, that his brother IS not conducting himself in the same way. If you mentioned in the "past" and / or "12 years ago", then you had a legitimate argument. But you made it look like this photo is a recent one, and that is why I asked you for your source. Now you get it!!

You are making yourself look silly as you bring up something that happened years ago, but then cannot accept the time frame involving Doug Ford!!

Yes, Scheer, oops sheer and excuse the pun, right wing hypocrisy!! Now you can possibly understand why I asked you the source that brought up a 12 year old photo!! Then showed you how well he really handled himself when he confronted that racist individual!!
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
Why bring his brother in the mix?? You make it seem like a present tense, that his brother IS not conducting himself in the same way. If you mentioned in the "past" and / or "12 years ago", then you had a legitimate argument. But you made it look like this photo is a recent one, and that is why I asked you for your source. Now you get it!!

You are making yourself look silly as you bring up something that happened years ago, but then cannot accept the time frame involving Doug Ford!!

Yes, Scheer, oops sheer and excuse the pun, right wing hypocrisy!! Now you can possibly understand why I asked you the source that brought up a 12 year old photo!! Then showed you how well he really handled himself when he confronted that racist individual!!
In the context of what I was saying, if you care to even think that deeply, we have a guy running for PM, yet his brother hates police to the point of carrying a sign in protest in public. And if you don't know that he was asked to apologise by his brother who was trying to make headway in his own political career, then you are foolish to assume otherwise.
It's about context.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,900
17,937
113
In the context of what I was saying, if you care to even think that deeply, we have a guy running for PM, yet his brother hates police to the point of carrying a sign in protest in public. And if you don't know that he was asked to apologise by his brother who was trying to make headway in his own political career, then you are foolish to assume otherwise.
It's about context.
You probably voted for a guy who's brother was a lying crackhead, right?
You probably even voted for and loved the crackhead.
Context.
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
You probably voted for a guy who's brother was a lying crackhead, right?
You probably even voted for and loved the crackhead.
Context.
Is this the part where you try to pass yourself off as a tolerant Liberal but your hypocrisy gets in the way...again?
No wonder you like sucking JT’s dick...he seems to have a knack for telling the rest of us how “WE should do better” after appearing in blackface over and over.
Still waiting for your answer about what his “costume” was.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,900
17,937
113
Is this the part where you try to pass yourself off as a tolerant Liberal but your hypocrisy gets in the way...again?
No wonder you like sucking JT’s dick...he seems to have a knack for telling the rest of us how “WE should do better” after appearing in blackface over and over.
Still waiting for your answer about what his “costume” was.
Is this the part where you try to tell me that its intolerant to be against having crackheads as mayors?
That its intolerant to criticize Ford for aiding his crackhead brother stay in office but intolerant for Singh to have a brother who protested something you don't agree with 10 years ago?
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
Is this the part where you try to tell me that its intolerant to be against having crackheads as mayors?
That its intolerant to criticize Ford for aiding his crackhead brother stay in office but intolerant for Singh to have a brother who protested something you don't agree with 10 years ago?
Tell me who is allowed in your opinion to have addiction issues?
And still can’t answer my question.
You’re a fraud who keeps avoiding the answer because it contradicts everything you claim to stand for.
Coward.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,900
17,937
113
Tell me who is allowed in your opinion to have addiction issues?
.
'Allowed'?

Anyone can have an addiction problem, but we don't let people drive drunk, we don't let people on pot drive and we shouldn't allow crackheads to run the city.
Are you telling me you are against drunk driving laws, you gonna say its unfair to addicts?
 
Toronto Escorts