Toronto Escorts

Porn Site Girls Do Porn Under Investigation For Sex Trafficking

luvyeah

🤡🌎
Oct 24, 2018
2,553
1,206
113
TL;DR

-women reply to """modeling agencies"""
-sign contract
-do not read contract
-feel dirty afterwards

Guess this is rape culture.

The complaint alleged that the foursome “used deception and false promises to lure the victims, who had responded to ads for modeling jobs that would supposedly pay $5,000.”

Eventually, according to the DOJ, “the women were told the job was really for adult films.”

The complaint went on to explain that “to persuade the women to participate, the defendants convinced them they could remain anonymous and that their videos would not be posted on the internet.”
Why would you trust someone you just met, once a video exits best to assume your whole family is going to see it.

During the filming, some “were sexually assaulted and in at least one case raped.” Some were “forced to perform certain sex acts they had declined to do, or they would not be paid or allowed to leave.”
I'm pretty sure most employers don't pay you when you refuse work too.

What could they have honestly thought they were getting paid 3.5-5k for?
 

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
11,023
4,298
113
Emily Willis now one of the industry's biggest stars got her start with Girls Do Porn. Just when they busted a gang sex trafficking ring here in Canada. Now the porn industry is being targeted in the States.

https://www.xbiz.com/news/247515/heres-what-you-need-to-know-about-the-girlsdoporn-case

The "industry" is not being "targeted". Just one sleazy outfit. And they weren't "targeted" because of being in the adult industry. It was only after some 22 women filed a civil suit for fraud and the FBI was alerted and sat in on the trial that they decided to open an investigation.




The' DOJ released a statement informing that “the owners and two employees of the popular adult websites GirlsDoPorn and GirlsDoToys were charged in federal court today with sex trafficking crimes in connection with a scheme to deceive and coerce young women to appear in sex videos.”
The DOJ reported that the investigation followed a complaint against GirlsDoPorn owners Michael James Pratt and Matthew Isaac Wolfe, adult film performer and producer Ruben Andre Garcia and administrative assistant Valorie Moser.
The complaint alleged that the foursome “used deception and false promises to lure the victims, who had responded to ads for modeling jobs that would supposedly pay $5,000.”
Eventually, according to the DOJ, “the women were told the job was really for adult films.”
The complaint went on to explain that “to persuade the women to participate, the defendants convinced them they could remain anonymous and that their videos would not be posted on the internet.”
In reality, however, “the entire purpose was to post the videos on the internet.”
 

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
11,023
4,298
113
TL;DR

-women reply to """modeling agencies"""
-sign contract
-do not read contract
-feel dirty afterwards

Guess this is rape culture.



Why would you trust someone you just met, once a video exits best to assume your whole family is going to see it.



I'm pretty sure most employers don't pay you when you refuse work too.

What could they have honestly thought they were getting paid 3.5-5k for?

You are a Simpleton who brings your prejudice into a simply wrong situation. One that the real porn industry even despises.

"GirlsDontDoPornThe mainstream press — even the liberal middle-class news source of choice, the New York Times — has referred to GirlsDoPorn as “an amateur porn company” and as part of “the porn industry.” Whether or not they intend it, this feeds into the ongoing War on Porn narrative trying to paint deceptive practices as symptomatic of an industry-wide way of doing business.
Any serious analyst of the adult business will readily see this as a misguided, inaccurate depiction. The GirlsDoPorn fallout is not a cautionary tale for an entire industry, but the expected comeuppance for some rogue operators that have had, from the beginning, very questionable practices.
In a nutshell:

  • GirlsDoPorn is not “amateur porn.” True amateur porn is non-commercial depictions of personal sexual activity. Reddit is full of it; you can search for it now. Amateur porn is made by non-professional performers getting it on and being exhibitionistic for free.
  • GirlsDoPorn, by design, targeted civilians who never wished to be part of "the porn industry" and then, as one of their videographers just admitted under oath, lied to them. Legitimate porn producers do not misrepresent to their talent how their scenes will be distributed or promoted. The vast, overwhelmingly vast, majority of porn brands and companies work with professional talent, typically represented by a licensed agency who serves as a buffer between the many hopefuls and the actual talent who make it onto a professional set. Anyone in the adult business will describe this time-tested process as the industry standard, and not what GDP allegedly did.
  • GirlsDoPorn is, or was at one time, a murky operation that has used the industry’s network of distribution to peddle content that was sold as “pro-amateur” (aka pro-am), but which several of the women scouted have claimed was deceitfully presented to them verbally. The contracts they signed, according to the company, indicate otherwise. The San Diego civil trial, still proceeding in spite of the new criminal charges, is actually about this contractual dispute.
The New York Times, the Daily Beast, NBC and other news sources might consider reporting that the allegations against GirlsDoPorn's business practices are demonstrably abnormal for the adult industry at large. It is the duty of influential news organizations to not perpetuate the deceptive narratives peddled by lobbies which attempt to discredit all commercial expression of sexuality.
Further stigmatizing sex workers and industry leaders who continue striving to establish production standards and protocols by bundling them with atypical rogue producers gives dangerous rhetorical ammunition to the powerful forces lined up against consensual, commercial sexual expression."
 

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
11,023
4,298
113
TL;DR

-women reply to """modeling agencies"""
-sign contract
-do not read contract
-feel dirty afterwards

Guess this is rape culture.



Why would you trust someone you just met, once a video exits best to assume your whole family is going to see it.



I'm pretty sure most employers don't pay you when you refuse work too.

What could they have honestly thought they were getting paid 3.5-5k for?

More to counter your victim blaming misogyny ...

"As Samantha Cole wrote yesterday on Vice, “what GirlsDoPorn is not, however, is representative of how the porn industry works, according to a wide variety of people I’ve spoken to over the course of years of reporting about sex work. But anti-porn groups, sex worker-exclusionary feminists, and misogynists would like the rest of the world to believe otherwise. Many people who read about this case say that the women involved should have known better, or that they should feel shame for filming to begin with.”"
 

luvyeah

🤡🌎
Oct 24, 2018
2,553
1,206
113
You are a Simpleton who brings your prejudice into a simply wrong situation. One that the real porn industry even despises.

"GirlsDontDoPornThe mainstream press — even the liberal middle-class news source of choice, the New York Times — has referred to GirlsDoPorn as “an amateur porn company” and as part of “the porn industry.” Whether or not they intend it, this feeds into the ongoing War on Porn narrative trying to paint deceptive practices as symptomatic of an industry-wide way of doing business.
Any serious analyst of the adult business will readily see this as a misguided, inaccurate depiction. The GirlsDoPorn fallout is not a cautionary tale for an entire industry, but the expected comeuppance for some rogue operators that have had, from the beginning, very questionable practices.
In a nutshell:

  • GirlsDoPorn is not “amateur porn.” True amateur porn is non-commercial depictions of personal sexual activity. Reddit is full of it; you can search for it now. Amateur porn is made by non-professional performers getting it on and being exhibitionistic for free.
  • GirlsDoPorn, by design, targeted civilians who never wished to be part of "the porn industry" and then, as one of their videographers just admitted under oath, lied to them. Legitimate porn producers do not misrepresent to their talent how their scenes will be distributed or promoted. The vast, overwhelmingly vast, majority of porn brands and companies work with professional talent, typically represented by a licensed agency who serves as a buffer between the many hopefuls and the actual talent who make it onto a professional set. Anyone in the adult business will describe this time-tested process as the industry standard, and not what GDP allegedly did.
  • GirlsDoPorn is, or was at one time, a murky operation that has used the industry’s network of distribution to peddle content that was sold as “pro-amateur” (aka pro-am), but which several of the women scouted have claimed was deceitfully presented to them verbally. The contracts they signed, according to the company, indicate otherwise. The San Diego civil trial, still proceeding in spite of the new criminal charges, is actually about this contractual dispute.
The New York Times, the Daily Beast, NBC and other news sources might consider reporting that the allegations against GirlsDoPorn's business practices are demonstrably abnormal for the adult industry at large. It is the duty of influential news organizations to not perpetuate the deceptive narratives peddled by lobbies which attempt to discredit all commercial expression of sexuality.
Further stigmatizing sex workers and industry leaders who continue striving to establish production standards and protocols by bundling them with atypical rogue producers gives dangerous rhetorical ammunition to the powerful forces lined up against consensual, commercial sexual expression."
You're an emotional zombie, that is all there is to it. It's only the hard truth, actions have consequences.
They had the free will to put themselves in that situation.
They freely contacted the ad.
They freely chose to meet this person without any research or background check to see if it was a reliable company.
They wanted quick and easy money and they learned a hard and valuable lesson not to trust strangers.

While I don't condone what happened.
You can't forgo the fact that they didn't think this through well, if at all.
 

luvyeah

🤡🌎
Oct 24, 2018
2,553
1,206
113
More to counter your victim blaming misogyny ...

"As Samantha Cole wrote yesterday on Vice, “what GirlsDoPorn is not, however, is representative of how the porn industry works, according to a wide variety of people I’ve spoken to over the course of years of reporting about sex work. But anti-porn groups, sex worker-exclusionary feminists, and misogynists would like the rest of the world to believe otherwise. Many people who read about this case say that the women involved should have known better, or that they should feel shame for filming to begin with.”"
From the vice article:

None of us thought we were going to be exploited and none of us thought of this as a career.
As I suspected not much thinking involved.

An apparent ama:

https://old.reddit.com/r/tabled/comments/41ye6q/table_iama_girl_from_girlsdoporncom_ama/
 

Grimnul

Well-known member
May 15, 2018
1,482
27
48
From what I’ve read in the past, those guys were pretty scummy. From what I understand, they weren’t saying it was for modelling or whatever, but they would tell the girls the videos were for private collections and wouldn’t be published, or that they’d be released only in certain countries and blocked in the U.S. Granted, a bit naive to believe that any content that’s put on the internet won’t be circulated, but still very shitty to deceive the girls like that.
 

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
5,904
1,172
113
From what I’ve read in the past, those guys were pretty scummy. From what I understand, they weren’t saying it was for modelling or whatever, but they would tell the girls the videos were for private collections and wouldn’t be published, or that they’d be released only in certain countries and blocked in the U.S. Granted, a bit naive to believe that any content that’s put on the internet won’t be circulated, but still very shitty to deceive the girls like that.
It sounds like it's simply regret. Fucking on camera while you're young and hot sounded cool. Then they realized that it would be on the internet indefinitely.
 

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
5,904
1,172
113
I was always impressed how GDP recruited and filmed some young women for the first and only time. Sure, there were a few girls who went on to other scenes for other porn companies. There just is some amazing talent on their site never seen anywhere again.

This young woman made an indelible mark in my head.



https://www.xvideos.com/video16018251/sexy_girl_with_a_big_ass_gets_fucked
 

icespot

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2005
1,692
84
48
Not sure about this one, sounds like women that made a bad choice and now it's every ones fault, but theirs for making the bad choice.

I come to this conclusion after reading what one of the women said, specially the part about being 2000 short. So if it had been paid 5000 instead of three and the videos only shown to certain clients then they would not have a problem???

I grew up in the 80s where people took responsibility for their bad choices.....

“If I had known that not only was it going on the Internet,” she said, “but that they were posting it on the Internet, that my name would be attached to it, that it would be in the United States, and that I wouldn’t be paid $5,000, but $2,000 less, and insulted because I was pale and bruised; if I had known that it was more than 30 minutes of filming, if I had known any of that, just any one of those; if I had known that other girls had been harassed and kicked out of school for it, if I had known that I would be kicked off the cheer team; if I had known any of that, I wouldn’t have done it.”
 

roadhog

Astute Observer
Aug 8, 2005
3,157
959
113
On the highway of life
Before Pornwikileaks was bought by BangBros and shut down over Labour Day weekend, there was a lengthy thread there discussing the lawsuit. Some of what I was able to read seemed to indicate the women had a strong case.
 

Grimnul

Well-known member
May 15, 2018
1,482
27
48
Found this.

http://mikesouth.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/217368_Does_v_GirlsDoPorn_rhett_pardon.pdf

Yeah, that seems scummy as hell. If that’s to be believed, the guys apparently use fake modeling sites to recruit girls, pull the bait and switch only after they’ve been flown to California, assure them the videos won’t be distributed, and often film in hotels without the hotel’s knowledge or consent. Very shady, and certainly seems beyond the scope of just “regret”. (Also, just saying guys, that kind of victim blaming is a bad look).
 

apoptygma

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2017
3,043
100
48
Found this.

http://mikesouth.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/217368_Does_v_GirlsDoPorn_rhett_pardon.pdf

Yeah, that seems scummy as hell. If that’s to be believed, the guys apparently use fake modeling sites to recruit girls, pull the bait and switch only after they’ve been flown to California, assure them the videos won’t be distributed, and often film in hotels without the hotel’s knowledge or consent. Very shady, and certainly seems beyond the scope of just “regret”. (Also, just saying guys, that kind of victim blaming is a bad look).
How is it any of the hotel's business?
 

Grimnul

Well-known member
May 15, 2018
1,482
27
48
How is it any of the hotel's business?
Generally when you’re filming something for commercial purposes, you’re required to get consent from the owner of the property you’re filming on.

Also, really? That’s your only take away from all that?
 

luvyeah

🤡🌎
Oct 24, 2018
2,553
1,206
113
I can imagine the amount of subscriptions to the site on the rise before it get's shut down. Some of the girls performed only 1 day after they turned 18.

http://girlsdoporn.com/
Why do subscriptions sites even exist anymore?
You can find all this shit on free sites, I'll never understand.
 
Toronto Escorts