Does Fox have any credibility in the manner that two of their anchors shared Trump's election platforms??Yes local news does not have much bias, that's why i said MSM news channels.
Does Fox have any credibility in the manner that two of their anchors shared Trump's election platforms??Yes local news does not have much bias, that's why i said MSM news channels.
NopeDoes Fox have any credibility in the manner that two of their anchors shared Trump's election platforms??
Their international news has a lot of content that other American channels cannot match up to. They have more reporters around the globe than networks like Fox. Fox is only watched for it's drama, series and other shows, but their news networks are virtually unknown outside of America. Not surprising!!I wonder if this is just because of wide global distribution and not actual popularity by choice. CNN was the first U.S. 24 hour cable news network. For many years, it was the only way to stay apprised of news back home when traveling abroad.
Like I said, I knew the concept would go over the heads of the trump devotees. Until the election, these polls are the most accurate barometers we have.I don't even think educated liberals understand what you are trying to say.
Probably Sky would be a better comparable to CNN.Their international news has a lot of content that other American channels cannot match up to. They have more reporters around the globe than networks like Fox. Fox is only watched for it's drama, series and other shows, but their news networks are virtually unknown outside of America. Not surprising!!
No, the polls are only as good as methodology and they can be very wrong. Before 2016 election I kept laughing at the presidential polls that kept oversampling the registered Democrats, only to be accused of pretty much everything unholy. Well, we know how that turned out. The point is that the polls can be very wrong by design or mistake. Far from a fact.Wrong again. The results are the results are the results. That is a fact. They may not be totally accurate but the results they present are the factual result of the poll.
And trump and his supporter go nuckin' futs if they don't like the results.
Fox is credible when they conduct an objective poll, it is a factual result. Their opinion mouthpieces are biased, TDS blowhards who clearly have no and deserve no credibility. I am sure the clear difference between those scenarios will go over your trump devotee head.
I knew you wouldn't have the intellect to understand. LOL. TDS indeed.No, the polls are only as good as methodology and they can be very wrong. Before 2016 election I kept laughing at the presidential polls that kept oversampling the registered Democrats, only to be accused of pretty much everything unholy. Well, we know how that turned out. The point is that the polls can be very wrong by design or mistake. Far from a fact.
I presume one is Hannity. Are opinion commentators considered news anchors? For appearances, Hannity should not get so in bed with the Trump campaign.Does Fox have any credibility in the manner that two of their anchors shared Trump's election platforms??
Still flogging this idea that polls are facts?So to summarize, it is a fact that Fox's poll said 51% and that is the number that made trump and his cult upset.
'He's not our boss': Fox News anchors trash Trump in meeting with advertisersI presume one is Hannity. Are opinion commentators considered news anchors? For appearances, Hannity should not get so in bed with the Trump campaign.
For what it's worth, MSNBC's Chris Hayes did a Green New Deal townhall type event with AOC. He was licking her ass clean.
Another trumptard who lacks basic reading skills. That is not what I said. I said that when an organization releases the results of an objective poll, then unless they are lying about their results, they are stating what the actual results they found were. They are stating a fact that the result of the poll was "X". Not that it is 100% accurate and the actual number is a fact.Still flogging this idea that polls are facts?
Does this sound like "licking ass" to you??I presume one is Hannity. Are opinion commentators considered news anchors? For appearances, Hannity should not get so in bed with the Trump campaign.
For what it's worth, MSNBC's Chris Hayes did a Green New Deal townhall type event with AOC. He was licking her ass clean.
I'm not sure what I am suppose to look for in an 18 minute clip of Hayes and AOC. Irregardless, I watched this when it first aired. Hayes was quite agreeable with AOC. He appeared to be fawning over her views.Does this sound like "licking ass" to you??
https://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/...sation-with-msnbc-s-chris-hayes-1468154947968
Hannity, Pirro, Ingraham and of course Carlson must be licking Trump's ass on a daily basis then.
But tell us who has done what Hannity and Pirro did by appearing on Trump's Rally and spoke in favour of Trump?? This was unprecedented!!
The words I underlined above is our disagreement in a nutshell. I said in this thread that polls were subjective as in "subjectively built meat grinders".That is not what I said. I said that when an organization releases the results of an objective poll, then unless they are lying about their results, they are stating what the actual results they found were.
Oh, boy! I only responded because of your idiotic assertion that polls are a fact.I knew you wouldn't have the intellect to understand. LOL. TDS indeed.
Despite whatever Fox's methodology was and whether it provided an accurate number or not, do you dispute that Fox provided us with the actual result of their poll? Unless you think they lied about what they published, then you acknowledge it is a FACT that Fox's poll said 51% favour to impeach and remove trump. Of any organization Fox is the last one who would lie about their result and make the number in favour of impeachment higher.
So to summarize, it is a fact that Fox's poll said 51% and that is the number that made trump and his cult upset. Anything even slightly negative about trump sends you guys off the rails. You cannot accept a whit of criticism, exactly what you accused non-trump supporters of in your earlier post.
What exactly was wrong with their methodology? What was Fox's motivation to make it subjective such that the results were more negative to trump than what you thought they should be? If anything, a poll conducted by Fox would be expected to give trump better results.The words I underlined above is our disagreement in a nutshell. I said in this thread that polls were subjective as in "subjectively built meat grinders".
You are hopeless.Oh, boy! I only responded because of your idiotic assertion that polls are a fact.
Yawn. Spin. Re read your original answer to my first post. You don't get to move the goalposts after stating that the poll was "objective" and "not even an opinion, it's a fact". Now, the publishing it makes it a fact? Roflmfao! I better go, I can feel my IQ falling.You are hopeless.
Question: Did the Fox poll say that 51% think trump should be impeached? Answer: Yes Hence, it is a fact that the result of the Fox poll says that 51% support impeachment.