Toronto Escorts

Shepard Smith makes shocking announcement that he is leaving Fox News

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,462
5,654
113
I wonder if this is just because of wide global distribution and not actual popularity by choice. CNN was the first U.S. 24 hour cable news network. For many years, it was the only way to stay apprised of news back home when traveling abroad.
Their international news has a lot of content that other American channels cannot match up to. They have more reporters around the globe than networks like Fox. Fox is only watched for it's drama, series and other shows, but their news networks are virtually unknown outside of America. Not surprising!!
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
46,945
8,119
113
Toronto
I don't even think educated liberals understand what you are trying to say.
Like I said, I knew the concept would go over the heads of the trump devotees. Until the election, these polls are the most accurate barometers we have.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
46,945
8,119
113
Toronto
Their international news has a lot of content that other American channels cannot match up to. They have more reporters around the globe than networks like Fox. Fox is only watched for it's drama, series and other shows, but their news networks are virtually unknown outside of America. Not surprising!!
Probably Sky would be a better comparable to CNN.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
Wrong again. The results are the results are the results. That is a fact. They may not be totally accurate but the results they present are the factual result of the poll.

And trump and his supporter go nuckin' futs if they don't like the results.

Fox is credible when they conduct an objective poll, it is a factual result. Their opinion mouthpieces are biased, TDS blowhards who clearly have no and deserve no credibility. I am sure the clear difference between those scenarios will go over your trump devotee head.
No, the polls are only as good as methodology and they can be very wrong. Before 2016 election I kept laughing at the presidential polls that kept oversampling the registered Democrats, only to be accused of pretty much everything unholy. Well, we know how that turned out. The point is that the polls can be very wrong by design or mistake. Far from a fact.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
46,945
8,119
113
Toronto
No, the polls are only as good as methodology and they can be very wrong. Before 2016 election I kept laughing at the presidential polls that kept oversampling the registered Democrats, only to be accused of pretty much everything unholy. Well, we know how that turned out. The point is that the polls can be very wrong by design or mistake. Far from a fact.
I knew you wouldn't have the intellect to understand. LOL. TDS indeed.

Despite whatever Fox's methodology was and whether it provided an accurate number or not, do you dispute that Fox provided us with the actual result of their poll? Unless you think they lied about what they published, then you acknowledge it is a FACT that Fox's poll said 51% favour to impeach and remove trump. Of any organization Fox is the last one who would lie about their result and make the number in favour of impeachment higher.

So to summarize, it is a fact that Fox's poll said 51% and that is the number that made trump and his cult upset. Anything even slightly negative about trump sends you guys off the rails. You cannot accept a whit of criticism, exactly what you accused non-trump supporters of in your earlier post.
 

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
5,927
1,198
113
Does Fox have any credibility in the manner that two of their anchors shared Trump's election platforms??
I presume one is Hannity. Are opinion commentators considered news anchors? For appearances, Hannity should not get so in bed with the Trump campaign.

For what it's worth, MSNBC's Chris Hayes did a Green New Deal townhall type event with AOC. He was licking her ass clean.
 

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
5,927
1,198
113
So to summarize, it is a fact that Fox's poll said 51% and that is the number that made trump and his cult upset.
Still flogging this idea that polls are facts?

They're just a key part of the 24/7 infotainment industry.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,631
17,845
113

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
46,945
8,119
113
Toronto
Still flogging this idea that polls are facts?
Another trumptard who lacks basic reading skills. That is not what I said. I said that when an organization releases the results of an objective poll, then unless they are lying about their results, they are stating what the actual results they found were. They are stating a fact that the result of the poll was "X". Not that it is 100% accurate and the actual number is a fact.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,462
5,654
113
I presume one is Hannity. Are opinion commentators considered news anchors? For appearances, Hannity should not get so in bed with the Trump campaign.

For what it's worth, MSNBC's Chris Hayes did a Green New Deal townhall type event with AOC. He was licking her ass clean.
Does this sound like "licking ass" to you??

https://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/...sation-with-msnbc-s-chris-hayes-1468154947968

Hannity, Pirro, Ingraham and of course Carlson must be licking Trump's ass on a daily basis then.

But tell us who has done what Hannity and Pirro did by appearing on Trump's Rally and spoke in favour of Trump?? This was unprecedented!!

https://www.latimes.com/business/hollywood/la-fi-ct-hannity-trump-20181106-story.html

Difference between night and day. Okay??
 

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
5,927
1,198
113
Does this sound like "licking ass" to you??

https://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/...sation-with-msnbc-s-chris-hayes-1468154947968

Hannity, Pirro, Ingraham and of course Carlson must be licking Trump's ass on a daily basis then.

But tell us who has done what Hannity and Pirro did by appearing on Trump's Rally and spoke in favour of Trump?? This was unprecedented!!
I'm not sure what I am suppose to look for in an 18 minute clip of Hayes and AOC. Irregardless, I watched this when it first aired. Hayes was quite agreeable with AOC. He appeared to be fawning over her views.

On the point of Hannity and Pirro, I think several of us have said getting so close to Trump is inappropriate.
 

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
5,927
1,198
113
That is not what I said. I said that when an organization releases the results of an objective poll, then unless they are lying about their results, they are stating what the actual results they found were.
The words I underlined above is our disagreement in a nutshell. I said in this thread that polls were subjective as in "subjectively built meat grinders".

Let's face it. If 30% or 70% of the country wanted Trump removed, we wouldn't be having this discussion.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
I knew you wouldn't have the intellect to understand. LOL. TDS indeed.

Despite whatever Fox's methodology was and whether it provided an accurate number or not, do you dispute that Fox provided us with the actual result of their poll? Unless you think they lied about what they published, then you acknowledge it is a FACT that Fox's poll said 51% favour to impeach and remove trump. Of any organization Fox is the last one who would lie about their result and make the number in favour of impeachment higher.

So to summarize, it is a fact that Fox's poll said 51% and that is the number that made trump and his cult upset. Anything even slightly negative about trump sends you guys off the rails. You cannot accept a whit of criticism, exactly what you accused non-trump supporters of in your earlier post.
Oh, boy! I only responded because of your idiotic assertion that polls are a fact.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
46,945
8,119
113
Toronto
The words I underlined above is our disagreement in a nutshell. I said in this thread that polls were subjective as in "subjectively built meat grinders".
What exactly was wrong with their methodology? What was Fox's motivation to make it subjective such that the results were more negative to trump than what you thought they should be? If anything, a poll conducted by Fox would be expected to give trump better results.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
46,945
8,119
113
Toronto
Oh, boy! I only responded because of your idiotic assertion that polls are a fact.
You are hopeless.

Question: Did the Fox poll say that 51% think trump should be impeached? Answer: Yes Hence, it is a fact that the result of the Fox poll says that 51% support impeachment.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
You are hopeless.

Question: Did the Fox poll say that 51% think trump should be impeached? Answer: Yes Hence, it is a fact that the result of the Fox poll says that 51% support impeachment.
Yawn. Spin. Re read your original answer to my first post. You don't get to move the goalposts after stating that the poll was "objective" and "not even an opinion, it's a fact". Now, the publishing it makes it a fact? Roflmfao! I better go, I can feel my IQ falling.
 
Toronto Escorts