Toronto Escorts

Ford’s decision to axe child benefit will affect 1,800 kids in Hamilton

Charlemagne

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2017
15,451
2,484
113
Doug Ford’s ‘absolutely cruel’ decision to axe child benefit will affect 1,800 kids in Hamilton

NEWS Sep 16, 2019
by Katrina Clarke
The Hamilton Spectator

A Hamilton anti-poverty advocate calls the Ford government's elimination of a child benefit "absolutely cruel" amid a city report showing 1,800 children receive it.

The Transition Child Benefit currently provides refugee-claimant families and low-income families who are unable to access Ontario or Canada child benefits with a maximum of $230 per child per month. The Ford government announced in April it will eliminate the benefit as of November 1, leaving vulnerable families worried about their future, advocates fuming and municipalities scrambling to make up the loss.

A recent city of Hamilton report states 1,800 children in Hamilton receive the benefit, paid out by the province. About 40 per cent of cases involve refugee claimants and 87 per cent of cases involve children under the age of three.

"It's absolutely cruel because they are punishing the most vulnerable children in society," said Tom Cooper, director of the Hamilton Roundtable for Poverty Reduction, calling the province's decision "nonsensical" and "beyond the pale."

If the program is cut and nothing replaces it, families will face greater hunger, homelessness and "extreme hardship," he said.

In Toronto, the city is considering a $8.4 million "temporary family housing benefit" to help up to 4,000 families adjust after the cuts are implemented this fall.

"What we are doing is prudently providing for temporary continuation of that funding while we try to get the other governments — plural — to accept responsibility where it properly belongs," said Toronto Mayor John Tory, referring to both the provincial and federal governments.

In Hamilton, a city councillor is also slamming the province for "downloading" the cost onto municipalities.

"The trend is always to shock and awe and then have city come to the plate to make up the difference," said Coun. Sam Merulla, chair of the city's Emergency and Community Services Committee. "It seems that this government is more focused on making those decision to download on issues that affect the most marginalized."

Merulla said even though the city can't afford to help, it is "cornered" and will not leave constituents helpless.

"Can we eliminate the entire impact? I'm not sure," he said. "But can we mitigate it? I'm almost certain we can."

A total of $1.9 million in benefits was paid to families receiving financial assistance in Hamilton last year.

Merulla said the committee will ask city staff to look into options and present a report.

Meanwhile, the Income Security Advocacy Centre (ISAC) legal clinic, which advocates on behalf of people on social assistance, has launched a Charter challenge of the Ford government's decision to make the cut.

"The cut to social assistance for children will mean no money for their necessities, such as food, clothing or diapers and will have a devastating impact on the health and well-being of children," said ISAC lawyer Jackie Esmonde in the notice of claim.

Grace Baldwin, a program manager with the Good Shepherd Centre in Hamilton, said she's already receiving calls from clients worried about how they'll pay their rent.

"People move into apartments factoring this money into their budgets," Baldwin said, noting a family with four children could receive up to $920 a month with the benefit.

The cut will "absolutely" mean homeless for some, longer shelter stays for others, she said.

https://www.thespec.com/news-story/9597883-doug-ford-s-absolutely-cruel-decision-to-axe-child-benefit-will-affect-1-800-kids-in-hamilton/
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
Doug Ford’s ‘absolutely cruel’ decision to axe child benefit will affect 1,800 kids in Hamilton

NEWS Sep 16, 2019
by Katrina Clarke
The Hamilton Spectator

A Hamilton anti-poverty advocate calls the Ford government's elimination of a child benefit "absolutely cruel" amid a city report showing 1,800 children receive it.

The Transition Child Benefit currently provides refugee-claimant families and low-income families who are unable to access Ontario or Canada child benefits with a maximum of $230 per child per month. The Ford government announced in April it will eliminate the benefit as of November 1, leaving vulnerable families worried about their future, advocates fuming and municipalities scrambling to make up the loss.

A recent city of Hamilton report states 1,800 children in Hamilton receive the benefit, paid out by the province. About 40 per cent of cases involve refugee claimants and 87 per cent of cases involve children under the age of three.

"It's absolutely cruel because they are punishing the most vulnerable children in society," said Tom Cooper, director of the Hamilton Roundtable for Poverty Reduction, calling the province's decision "nonsensical" and "beyond the pale."

If the program is cut and nothing replaces it, families will face greater hunger, homelessness and "extreme hardship," he said.

In Toronto, the city is considering a $8.4 million "temporary family housing benefit" to help up to 4,000 families adjust after the cuts are implemented this fall.

"What we are doing is prudently providing for temporary continuation of that funding while we try to get the other governments — plural — to accept responsibility where it properly belongs," said Toronto Mayor John Tory, referring to both the provincial and federal governments.

In Hamilton, a city councillor is also slamming the province for "downloading" the cost onto municipalities.

"The trend is always to shock and awe and then have city come to the plate to make up the difference," said Coun. Sam Merulla, chair of the city's Emergency and Community Services Committee. "It seems that this government is more focused on making those decision to download on issues that affect the most marginalized."

Merulla said even though the city can't afford to help, it is "cornered" and will not leave constituents helpless.

"Can we eliminate the entire impact? I'm not sure," he said. "But can we mitigate it? I'm almost certain we can."

A total of $1.9 million in benefits was paid to families receiving financial assistance in Hamilton last year.

Merulla said the committee will ask city staff to look into options and present a report.

Meanwhile, the Income Security Advocacy Centre (ISAC) legal clinic, which advocates on behalf of people on social assistance, has launched a Charter challenge of the Ford government's decision to make the cut.

"The cut to social assistance for children will mean no money for their necessities, such as food, clothing or diapers and will have a devastating impact on the health and well-being of children," said ISAC lawyer Jackie Esmonde in the notice of claim.

Grace Baldwin, a program manager with the Good Shepherd Centre in Hamilton, said she's already receiving calls from clients worried about how they'll pay their rent.

"People move into apartments factoring this money into their budgets," Baldwin said, noting a family with four children could receive up to $920 a month with the benefit.

The cut will "absolutely" mean homeless for some, longer shelter stays for others, she said.

https://www.thespec.com/news-story/9597883-doug-ford-s-absolutely-cruel-decision-to-axe-child-benefit-will-affect-1-800-kids-in-hamilton/
Accepting refugees into Canada without a plan to sustain them is cruel...and stupid.
Why don't they ask the feds to provide support?
Your rage is misdirected.
 

Charlemagne

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2017
15,451
2,484
113
Accepting refugees into Canada without a plan to sustain them is cruel...and stupid.
Why don't they ask the feds to provide support?
Your rage is misdirected.
It's not just refugees that benefit, this is clearly stated in the article. It's funny that's all you need to see to justify Dofo's war on the poor.
 

Insidious Von

My head is my home
Sep 12, 2007
38,285
6,538
113
Children should be a top priority, Anyone born after 1995 is going to inherit a severely fucked up world.

Still I'd rather have RoFo than a Social Conservative like Shiva Scheer.
 

Insidious Von

My head is my home
Sep 12, 2007
38,285
6,538
113
Accepting refugees into Canada without a plan to sustain them is cruel...and stupid.
Why don't they ask the feds to provide support?
Your rage is misdirected.
Immigrants are usually motivated to become productive in their adoptive country. Canada benefited from the influx of Vietnamese and Cambodian boat people and the Thatcher economic refugees (mostly Scots and Geordies). Not sure if any of the governments of the time had a refugee plan?

As for a pension, you should be building it up over time on your own. You can't expect the Federal Government to hold your hand as you age.
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
It's not just refugees that benefit, this is clearly stated in the article. It's funny that's all you need to see to justify Dofo's war on the poor.
"About 40 per cent of cases involve refugee claimants "
...now wouldn't that 40% be available for the "not just refugees" if there wasn't a refugee crisis?
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
Immigrants are usually motivated to become productive in their adoptive country. Canada benefited from the influx of Vietnamese and Cambodian boat people and the Thatcher economic refugees (mostly Scots and Geordies). Not sure if any of the governments of the time had a refugee plan?

As for a pension, you should be building it up over time on your own. You can't expect the Federal Government to hold your hand as you age.
Private sponsorship played more of a part in that in those situations. This has dwindled over the years unfortunately. We didn't have a housing crisis back then either.
I wonder how many refugees China and India take in every year? Nuclear powers, economic giants and leaders in pollution generation. Let me see here....zero!
Unless of course they consider our dollars and jobs as refugees?
 

dickydoem

Area 51 Escapee
Apr 15, 2003
1,179
64
48
Stuck in Lodi again
Every cut that Ford makes is always portrayed as hurting the children. Maybe if Wynne's Liberals hadn't spent this province in to such a precarious financial situation these cuts wouldn't be necessary. She might have even won the election or did you forget that the people of Ontario made a choice and it wasn't want you wanted. What would you cut? Or would you just keep spending until these same children that you are so concerned about would inherit a bankrupt province where there would be no money for any services?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,962
17,956
113
Every cut that Ford makes is always portrayed as hurting the children.
Yup.
And you know why?

'cuz DoFo chose give corporations a massive tax break, which means that Ford's deficit is $3 billion more than Wynne's would have been, except that he's cut health care, education and social services people care about.
Not to mention his attacks on Toronto.
 

glamphotographer

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2011
15,963
15,691
113
Canada
Still I'd rather have RoFo than a Social Conservative like Shiva Scheer.
Come to think of it, me too. I don't like Dofo and I'd rather have Mulroney over Shiva Scheer. Scheer comes from a strict religious background, I guy that that will revisit Bill C-36.
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
Yup.
And you know why?

'cuz DoFo chose give corporations a massive tax break, which means that Ford's deficit is $3 billion more than Wynne's would have been, except that he's cut health care, education and social services people care about.
Not to mention his attacks on Toronto.
What would you cut?
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
Every cut that Ford makes is always portrayed as hurting the children. Maybe if Wynne's Liberals hadn't spent this province in to such a precarious financial situation these cuts wouldn't be necessary. She might have even won the election or did you forget that the people of Ontario made a choice and it wasn't want you wanted. What would you cut? Or would you just keep spending until these same children that you are so concerned about would inherit a bankrupt province where there would be no money for any services?
You points are akin to asking a teenager who has run rampant for years on their parents' credit card and has been asked to finally pay it back and the only way they can is to stop buying stuff they like ie they're not happy. You can see why the left is not happy.
They've undergone 15 years of Liberal governments bribing them with their own money and conditioned to believe that money is in never-ending supply.
Poor buggers.
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
Tax breaks for the rich and corporations.
...and then they leave. Where will your tax revenue come from then? All the unemployed people?

No corporations, no jobs. No jobs, no tax revenue. No tax revenue, no social services.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts