Asian Sexy Babe
Toronto Escorts

Trump and Barr get an embarrassing slapdown from Grand Jury re McCabe indictment

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
6,829
2,838
113
Trump and Barr get an embarrassing slapdown as grand jury reportedly will not indict Andrew McCabe


On any Sharpie-scrawled enemy list adorning Donald Trump’s desk, Andrew McCabe’s name is almost certainly at the top. The former deputy director of the FBI has been the target of no fewer than 49 Trump tweets, as well as the subject of many helicopter-side rants. After all that, Trump paused on Thursday to savor what appeared to be a bad day for his “enemy” with a tweet repeating the claim that charges had been filed against McCabe.

But a letter from McCabe’s attorneys to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Washington, D.C., that came out later that same day suggests that this particular attempt at using the legal system to persecute a perceived political opponent ran into a hugely embarrassing obstacle: When the DOJ took the case in front of a grand jury, it could not secure an indictment.

Getting a grand Jury to provide an indictment is famously easy. As in, “would indict a ham sandwich” easy. If the letter is accurate in saying that a grand jury returned “no true bill” when confronted with the evidence against McCabe, that’s not just an unusual result; that’s a crushing embarrassment for Barr’s Justice Department and its first attempt at turning “Lock (insert name here) up” from a rally chant to reality.

Back in May, The Washington Post looked at the case that Trump’s team was mounting against McCabe. The charge was that McCabe lied to investigators to mislead them about the release of information related to the probe into Hillary Clinton’s emails. McCabe has repeatedly insisted that he didn’t mislead anyone, but the inspector general—the same IG who recently issued a report shaking a finger at James Comey—concluded that McCabe had broken department rules sufficiently to justify his expulsion from the FBI just hours ahead of the time where he could have retired with a pension.

At that time, McCabe’s attorney made a particularly telling statement about any attempt to indict McCabe: “[We are] confident that, unless there is inappropriate pressure from high levels of the Administration, the U.S. Attorney’s Office would conclude that it should decline to prosecute.” Prescient. Very prescient.

https://twitter.com/mayginmcewen/status/1172987649335783424?s=21


Hahahahahahahahaha
 

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
5,927
1,198
113
Let's wait and see. This is really media conjecture at this point.
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,495
11
38
Let's wait and see. This is really media conjecture at this point.
What isn't conjecture is that the US Attorney hasn't yet convinced half the members of the grand jury (that's all they need) to indict McCabe.

If it really is the open and shut sure thing His Orangetude so often tweeted it was, we'd surely have heard by now.
 

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
5,927
1,198
113
What isn't conjecture is that the US Attorney hasn't yet convinced half the members of the grand jury (that's all they need) to indict McCabe.

If it really is the open and shut sure thing His Orangetude so often tweeted it was, we'd surely have heard by now.
Maybe so, but how does anyone know precisely what a grand jury is thinking? Hmmm.
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,495
11
38
Maybe so, but how does anyone know precisely what a grand jury is thinking? Hmmm.
No one does. And many people have problems containing their curiosity and impatience. The article and millions of hopeful, or dire speculations like it through history are ample evidence of that.

Watch the same process if they indict, and the same sorts of people can't wait until there's a verdict.

The media that wants their eyeballs know who to feed and with what.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts