Toronto Escorts

DNC screwing Tulsi out of the debates

omegaphallic

Well-known member
Mar 26, 2010
3,003
42
48
https://youtu.be/_H6Puy43Ia0

From Secular talk. I've also heard from people who say they were going to say Tulsi to the pollsters, but they did not offer her as a choice. The DNC is cheating again and they can not and must not be allowed to get away with it. It's not just America at stake.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,815
3,470
113
I expected no less. Especially after the spanking she gave Harris. They are really scared of her. And the policies she represents.

But I guarantee the DNC won't back down. All that can be done is to put Sanders in. Then he can change the Leadership of the party.

With Tulsi either as his VP or Secretary of State.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,815
3,470
113
Let us get the real truth, and not some online Conspiracy Theorists. These were the rules that were set from Day 1. So read:

Here are the candidates who qualified for the third Democratic debate — and those who might miss out:

https://www.vox.com/2019/8/8/20758519/democratic-debate-qualification-polls-candidates-yang-gabbard
They are being quite selective about the polling. She has more than matched the donation threshold with proves grassroots support.

They are scared of her.
 

omegaphallic

Well-known member
Mar 26, 2010
3,003
42
48
https://youtu.be/hdLOfqCnLjI

Tulsi Gabbard has made it in 23 polls, 23! And as far as the DNC counts 1. There was a bunch of qualifying spolls before the debates, 3 since the last debate, one of the qualifying polls with a margin of error two and a half larger then the entrance require of 2%.

The DNC is doing everything it can to make sure Tulsi Gabbard doesn't make it to the next debate, they are terrified of her, more scared of her then even Bernie Sanders this time.

Watch the video as Kim Iveson shreds the DNC for its vickery on this. And it's not a conspiracy theory that the DNC cheats, it was proven in the past.
 

omegaphallic

Well-known member
Mar 26, 2010
3,003
42
48
They are being quite selective about the polling. She has more than matched the donation threshold with proves grassroots support.

They are scared of her.
Not just scared, absolutely terrified of her which is why they sensed their twitter thugs and MSM flunkies to spread rumours she an ally of Assad, the Putin, Modi, David Duke, ect..., if she was really at 1% why bother? Because she isn't and she is growing fast.
 

omegaphallic

Well-known member
Mar 26, 2010
3,003
42
48
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/a...d_by_dncs_dubious_debate_criteria_141055.html

This is insane, Tulsi should take this bullshit to court. There has not been a New Hampire qualifying poll since the last debate, which is an interesting given it's one of the states where Tulsi Gabbard is doing best (3.3% in one none qualifying, but perfectly fine poll).

The DNC could do a better job of reelecting Trump if he payed them too.
 

omegaphallic

Well-known member
Mar 26, 2010
3,003
42
48
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/a...d_by_dncs_dubious_debate_criteria_141055.html

This is insane, Tulsi should take this bullshit to court. There has not been a New Hampire qualifying poll since the last debate, which is an interesting given it's one of the states where Tulsi Gabbard is doing best (3.3% in one none qualifying, but perfectly fine poll).

The DNC could do a better job of reelecting Trump if he payed them too.
 

mellowjello

Well-known member
Jan 11, 2017
2,444
912
113
Let us get the real truth, and not some online Conspiracy Theorists. These were the rules that were set from Day 1. So read:

Here are the candidates who qualified for the third Democratic debate — and those who might miss out:

https://www.vox.com/2019/8/8/20758519/democratic-debate-qualification-polls-candidates-yang-gabbard
I have to agree with Butler and omega on this.
The discouraging aspect of this is that the illusion is gone, people know the system is rigged, people and media bemoan the
fact that the system is rigged, and yet nothing will ever change until everything goes in the shitter.
Political debate has become pure sport, anyone who genuinely addresses the real issues gets marginalized as a kook.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,815
3,470
113
She has recieved enough on a second poll. But with only 7 days left and polls not being fine or released from the few so called approved polls it's not looking good.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,462
5,654
113
I have to agree with Butler and omega on this.
The discouraging aspect of this is that the illusion is gone, people know the system is rigged, people and media bemoan the
fact that the system is rigged, and yet nothing will ever change until everything goes in the shitter.
Political debate has become pure sport, anyone who genuinely addresses the real issues gets marginalized as a kook.
Butler1000 said:
They are being quite selective about the polling. She has more than matched the donation threshold with proves grassroots support.

They are scared of her.
The rules were set in advance. There are numerous criticisms of them and there will always be, as it is too complicated and can be interpreted in several different ways. But Gabbard is not out of it as yet and could make the mark based on not only the donations but the polls as well. Remember that her own campaign criticised CNN as being biased. But their polls indicated that she qualified as per that poll:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...rd-campaign-calls-cnn-very-biased/1884548001/

Billionaire Tom Steyer is the next most likely candidate to qualify for the fall debate, needing just one additional poll after clearing the donor mark last week. Steyer was at 1 percent in the new CNN poll.

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii also picked up a qualifying poll on Tuesday, scoring 2 percent in CNN's national survey. This is her second qualifying poll, and she has already hit the donor mark.

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/08/20/biden-poll-lead-over-democrats-1469100
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,558
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
If you are not polling at 2% you are a distraction.
 

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
5,927
1,198
113
The rules were set in advance. There are numerous criticisms of them and there will always be, as it is too complicated and can be interpreted in several different ways.
This all kind of reminds me of the 65th, 66th and 67th American college basketball teams complaining they didn't make the March NCAA basketball tournament.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,815
3,470
113
If you are not polling at 2% you are a distraction.
She exposed Ryan, then Harris.

They are I think fearful of her ability to take down people. Biden would have been next.
 

mellowjello

Well-known member
Jan 11, 2017
2,444
912
113
The Establishment Dems vs Progressive Dems battle has more significant consequences than Dems vs Republican battle
in the bigger picture. The DOC is beholden to the same people that would rather see Trump than a Progressive Dem in the WH.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,815
3,470
113
The Establishment Dems vs Progressive Dems battle has more significant consequences than Dems vs Republican battle
in the bigger picture. The DOC is beholden to the same people that would rather see Trump than a Progressive Dem in the WH.
Yep. The rich people supporting Biden, Harris and Buttigieg don't want a progressive in either. They will settle for Trump and the tax cuts.
 

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
5,927
1,198
113
Yep. The rich people supporting Biden, Harris and Buttigieg don't want a progressive in either. They will settle for Trump and the tax cuts.
Perhaps you will get your wish of a Progressive heading the Democrat ticket. Don't go crying about how stupid voters are if that candidate crashes and burns. I don't want to hear it.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,815
3,470
113
Perhaps you will get your wish of a Progressive heading the Democrat ticket. Don't go crying about how stupid voters are if that candidate crashes and burns. I don't want to hear it.
I won't actually. I don't play that game. I accept the results of elections.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,462
5,654
113
At the end of the day, anyone who can take out this idiot from the Whitehouse is all that matters. I think Gabbard is the sexiest candidate, and I would like to see her in the next few debates, although she does not stand an iota of a chance to win the nomination!!
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts