Toronto Escorts

‘Transgender’ athletes have ‘intolerable’ advantage over real women, new study....

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,495
11
38
...afirms

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/t...il&utm_term=0_12387f0e3e-7efedcebfb-400674377

I didn't even have to go to school and get a degree to figire this one out. It's called a pair of balls. It's where a lot of testosterone gets built up. Kind of why sites like this exist. I hat to break it to you but guys have balls and girls don't. Guys in dresses even have balls.
However, I take pleasure in emphasizing to you that your source quote its source concluding: While the authors’ scientific conclusions fly in the face of LGBT orthodoxy, their social recommendations will likely be more palatable to trans activists. They suggest that “the existing male/female categories in sport should be abandoned in favour of a more nuanced approach satisfying both inclusion and fairness.”

In other words — mine — performance differences in sports may be gender-related, but they aren't gender-exclusive. There's no reason performance-similar athletes shouldn't compete with each other, irrespective of their genders, whether they're biological determined or socially assumed decisions.

Thanks for further evidence from serious medical researchers.
 

TeeJay

Well-known member
Jun 20, 2011
8,052
731
113
west gta
These guys make me laugh
Can't have it both ways

Either there is a distinct advantage between males and females OR we are all equal
It can't be both

For that matter why not throw the race card down?
I will argue an African athlete has a distinct advantage against an Asian athlete
Let's segregate the Olympics
 
  • Like
Reactions: uchual

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,495
11
38
These guys make me laugh
Can't have it both ways

Either there is a distinct advantage between males and females OR we are all equal
It can't be both

For that matter why not throw the race card down?
I will argue an African athlete has a distinct advantage against an Asian athlete
Let's segregate the Olympics
Nonsense. We have all sorts of ways in all sorts of fields, especially sports, to allow differently talented/skilled/abled people to compete fairly. That's why welterweights don't box with heavyweights. The most common such sport is golf. One reason its system of handicapping was invented, was precisely to do what you say is impossible. To make competition between men and women possible. But men like it too.

In fact that is exactly the purpose of all those elimination heats and preliminaries that TV never shows, to ensure that the finalists are evenly and fairly matched so the competitions for champion are exciting. As long as they are, who cares what 'race' or gender's involved? They're as irrelevant as language, hairstyle or favourite movie.

If you care, why?
 

Darts

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2017
23,061
11,160
113
I will argue an African athlete has a distinct advantage against an Asian athlete
We should listen to Old Jones. Let's take the 100 metre dash. To be fair, the starting line for the Asian athletes should be at the 20 metre line.

P.S. Just to be clear, I am being sarcastic. Giving some athletes a 20 metre head start is as bad as adding an extra 50 or more SAT points as they do in the U.S. for members of a particular ethnic group.
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,703
21
38
I think this is terrific. Let the feminists and transgenders duke it out. They're both extremely confused groups of people.

 

JuanGoodman

Goldmember
Jun 29, 2019
3,289
2,048
113
Nonsense. We have all sorts of ways in all sorts of fields, especially sports, to allow differently talented/skilled/abled people to compete fairly. That's why welterweights don't box with heavyweights. The most common such sport is golf. One reason its system of handicapping was invented, was precisely to do what you say is impossible. To make competition between men and women possible. But men like it too.

In fact that is exactly the purpose of all those elimination heats and preliminaries that TV never shows, to ensure that the finalists are evenly and fairly matched so the competitions for champion are exciting. As long as they are, who cares what 'race' or gender's involved? They're as irrelevant as language, hairstyle or favourite movie.

If you care, why?
With all due respect Oldtimer :biggrin: you are wrong on all counts. The boxing example you have given is simply there because size matters and a bigger guy has a huge advantage over a smaller guy in any contact sport, not only boxing. Of course they have to be at similar skill level as well. The weight class is there for that reason alone and not for allowing women to box against men. The golf handicap is only allowed at the amateur level and does not exist at the professional level. And the elimination heats are there to allow many competitors to enter the competition and come up with the final group to compete against each other in one go. It would be impossible to have 100 competitors do a 100 meter dash all at once. Sorry mate, that's how I see it.

I really do not understand what is the reason for this movement to prove something that is obviously not true, to be true. Women and men are different when it comes to the way our body is made. We are not physical equal. Man are physically stronger and have more endurance than women. We were born that way. And no amount of political maneuvering and correctness is going to change that. It might only lead to a silly outcome that Darts posted.

And to complicate matters more, enter the Transgender dragon. To me "transgender" is a mental disorder. If a person identified themselves as an amputee and requested that his arm be removed, he most likely would be treated in a mental facility. But if a man requests that his genitals be removed that's perfectly alright. Makes completely no sense at all.

And now, because most professional athletes are making huge amounts of money, there will be dishonest man who can't compete against other man at the highest level, who might see this push for all out equality as a opportunity to milk the system. And they even get to keep their balls.
 

TeeJay

Well-known member
Jun 20, 2011
8,052
731
113
west gta
Nonsense. We have all sorts of ways in all sorts of fields, especially sports, to allow differently talented/skilled/abled people to compete fairly. That's why welterweights don't box with heavyweights. The most common such sport is golf. One reason its system of handicapping was invented, was precisely to do what you say is impossible. To make competition between men and women possible. But men like it too.

In fact that is exactly the purpose of all those elimination heats and preliminaries that TV never shows, to ensure that the finalists are evenly and fairly matched so the competitions for champion are exciting. As long as they are, who cares what 'race' or gender's involved? They're as irrelevant as language, hairstyle or favourite movie.

If you care, why?
The argument above is that a transgender athlete has a distinct biological advantage over a female (which is true)
But by that same metric there are tons of other advantages we allow to happen on a daily basis in sports / competitions / life

The prelims basically eliminate everyone else
There is a reason why when you tune into say the Olympics sport A has 10 black guys lining up, B has 10 asians, & C has 10 whites
Genetics
 

TeeJay

Well-known member
Jun 20, 2011
8,052
731
113
west gta
We should listen to Old Jones. Let's take the 100 metre dash. To be fair, the starting line for the Asian athletes should be at the 20 metre line.

P.S. Just to be clear, I am being sarcastic. Giving some athletes a 20 metre head start is as bad as adding an extra 50 or more SAT points as they do in the U.S. for members of a particular ethnic group.
Oh I agree, BUT I am taking the stance that we are NOT all equal
We get BS stats showing how humans are all so similar or how a guy from Germany has more in common with Kenya than the Netherlands etc
Its nonsense masquerading as science

But once we accept the fact we are not all equal then what?
Give a less intelligent person a better job? Give a weaker person a handicap? Pretend people do not have genitals or hormones?

To me "transgender" is a mental disorder. If a person identified themselves as an amputee and requested that his arm be removed, he most likely would be treated in a mental facility. But if a man requests that his genitals be removed that's perfectly alright. Makes completely no sense at all.
People get their feathers all ruffled when someone suggests this but I think it is true
It's no different than saying someone has a mental handicap (eg retarded)
Doesn't mean they should be discriminated against but seriously what is the point of the psych industry if not to help people with mental issues
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,495
11
38
The argument above is that a transgender athlete has a distinct biological advantage over a female (which is true)
But by that same metric there are tons of other advantages we allow to happen on a daily basis in sports / competitions / life

The prelims basically eliminate everyone else
There is a reason why when you tune into say the Olympics sport A has 10 black guys lining up, B has 10 asians, & C has 10 whites
Genetics
I'm not sure whose argument above you refer to. I'm only disputing your assertions that men and women must compete separately due to their different characteristics, and there is no practical way they can compete together. In fact we have all sorts of competitions where athletes who greatly differ in physique still manage to compete against each other. And we also have competitions that successfully balance differences. I've mentioned both, and Juan's detail in his post above reinforces the point rather than disproving it. You're actually arguing against yourself with your 'race-genetics' stuff.

If genetically determined characteristics truly mattered, we couldn't have all those 'genetically-differing races' competing with each other. But we do, because the differences between 'races' are no more significant than the differences within them, and the same is true of gender. There are lots of Olympic-level men who run the 100 metres in the Olympics slower than lots of the women. And a note to Darts, the fastest Asian is only a few strides — six-hundredths of a second — behind the fastest African, not 20. The women's record is faster than either, by way more than 20 strides.
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,495
11
38
Oh I agree, BUT I am taking the stance that we are NOT all equal
We get BS stats showing how humans are all so similar or how a guy from Germany has more in common with Kenya than the Netherlands etc
Its nonsense masquerading as science

But once we accept the fact we are not all equal then what?
Give a less intelligent person a better job? Give a weaker person a handicap? Pretend people do not have genitals or hormones?



People get their feathers all ruffled when someone suggests this but I think it is true
It's no different than saying someone has a mental handicap (eg retarded)
Doesn't mean they should be discriminated against but seriously what is the point of the psych industry if not to help people with mental issues
If we were all equal, there would be no competitions at all.

Once we accept that we are all different and not all equal, then we realize there's little point or interest and no true competition in unbalanced matches. Which is why we don't put heavies in the ring with flyweights or run finals without eliminations. We manage to do all of that for good and proper reasons that have zero to do with gender.

You still haven't offered one reason why we can't just do more of the same without the pointless business of dividing athletes by what's between their legs. Does it really make a difference whether that bobsled or sailboat crew is all women, all men or even a mix? IF it does, then what difference? If a woman makes the qualifying time, why shouldn't she run against men?

In fact people manage to hold all sorts of gender-free competitions all the time, in all sorts of sports, so your 'objections', whatever they may be, have already been dealt with by someone, somewhere.

As f'rinstance in Boston, where men's and women'r Marathon record-times are just 16 minutes apart and everyone runs together (along with the wheelchair competitors who finish faster than both). What exactly are you arguing for? To 'protect' or preserve what?
 

The Oracle

Pronouns: Who/Cares
Mar 8, 2004
23,034
46,153
113
On the slopes of Mount Parnassus, Greece

TeeJay

Well-known member
Jun 20, 2011
8,052
731
113
west gta
@oldjones
They need to decide once and for all which way they want it

Either no restrictions whatsoever (claim that all genders / races / psych profiles) have a chance
Or segregate everything


I have always said (and agree with) facts such as women and men are physically different
But as mentioned above this exact same argument can be applied along racial lines
Get rid of the left wing rhetoric and segregate people
Disband the insanity that masquerades as the HRTO


Although you have mentioned paraolympic type athletes obviously (imo) a mechanical assist (your example of wheelchair "running") I can't imagine anyone trying to claim they would be equal since now you are going beyond genetics
 

JuanGoodman

Goldmember
Jun 29, 2019
3,289
2,048
113
@oldjones

I'm still confused at what you are saying, please make it simple for me.

Are you saying that, for example:

1. Mike Tyson should be able (if he was still competing) to fight a woman, for the title of the heavyweight champion of the world?

2. Mike Tyson should be able ( if he was still competing) to fight a woman, for the title of the heavyweight champion of the world, but we should tweak the rules a little bit, to make it more gender inclusive. For instance, he can't hit her?
 
Last edited:

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,495
11
38
@oldjones

I'm still confused at what you are saying, please make it simple for me.

Are you saying that, for example:

1. Mike Tyson should be able (if he was still competing) to fight a woman, for the title of the heavyweight champion of the world?

2. Mike Tyson should be able ( if he was still competing) to fight a woman, for the title of the heavyweight champion of the world, but we should tweak the rules a little bit, to make it more gender inclusive. For instance, he can't hit her?
1. Why not, as long as they were reasonably evenly matched? You described that business yourself. 2. Why would we? Do you have a point here?
 

Jasmine Raine

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2014
4,049
48
48
It is clear that a trans woman would have a better advantage over a cis-woman. And I think the other way around too and therefore I don't think they should compete along side others in their preferred gender categories.

Only because trans people needs to use hormones to maintain their change. It makes up a different biological chemistry in the body. We already ban the use of steroids. Which is similar to the hormone testosterone. It seems like a no brainer it me.

We have able-bodied Olympics and Paralympics. Have translympics as well. We have gender based sports so have trans-based sports. It may take some time for their to be enough trans people to make a baseball team but that is not the problem of cis-gendered people.
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,495
11
38
@oldjones
They need to decide once and for all which way they want it

Either no restrictions whatsoever (claim that all genders / races / psych profiles) have a chance
Or segregate everything


I have always said (and agree with) facts such as women and men are physically different
But as mentioned above this exact same argument can be applied along racial lines
Get rid of the left wing rhetoric and segregate people
Disband the insanity that masquerades as the HRTO


Although you have mentioned paraolympic type athletes obviously (imo) a mechanical assist (your example of wheelchair "running") I can't imagine anyone trying to claim they would be equal since now you are going beyond genetics
None of that makes sense to me. Who says 'they' need to decide once and for all? And decide what exactly? No one but you is talking about a free-for-all without categories and divisions. Besides we tinker with those continually, what's tad more adjusting?

Of course men and women are physically different, some of us have pussies and tits, some of us have dicks and balls. But athletics don't involve or require either. Only history and prejudices make them relevant at all.

Please point out any left-wing rhetoric you'd like us to stop using. For myself, I'd appreciate you not repeatedly dragging that political dead-horse in here. All I'm talking about and advocating is that any and all athletes who are reasonably equally matched should be allowed to compete with each other. As an athletic descriptor, gender is as irrelevant as 'race'. No politics in that, right or left.

Why should anyone's gender be a matter of concern to anyone but them and who they have sex with? It's how fast they are or how high they can jump.
 

TeeJay

Well-known member
Jun 20, 2011
8,052
731
113
west gta
@OJ
For Olympics? That would mean "they" are the IOC or other major organizations who run the sports
Since they are keepers of the keys I assumed that would be obvious

What you refer to as "tinkering" is a joke really
One year people get eliminated for things like cough syrups which share properties with steroids while HGH is legal
Now they are trying to FORCE certain athletes to TAKE drugs in order to SUPPRESS their NATURAL hormone levels


As another example there was an issue with some female runner who was stripped of eligibility because their testing deems she is a biological male (despite being born without male genitalia)
The divisions as they exist now simply do not work, but at the same time we (in principle) acknowledge there are some severe genetic advantages
Should we have another special Olympics for the 4 runners who are born female but have male chromo patterns? The attempts to categorize and segregate just aren't working

Link to news from last month:
https://www.cbc.ca/sports/olympics/trackandfield/caster-semenya-iaaf-1.5179748
 

JuanGoodman

Goldmember
Jun 29, 2019
3,289
2,048
113
1. Why not, as long as they were reasonably evenly matched? You described that business yourself. 2. Why would we? Do you have a point here?
That's just living in fantasy word not reality. No men was even reasonably evenly matched with Tyson at his prime. The only way a woman would be reasonably matched against him will be in next Hollywood "Rocky" starting a woman in the role of Rocky. It's fantasy. I chose Tyson as an extreme example to illustrate my point , but on average you would be doing a great disservice to all women and girls in particular if you had them compete against men. It would be a disaster. Most girls, on average wold not be able to compete and would simply not participate in sports anymore. There might be some who would be able to capable , but that would be an exception not a norm.

That's what we are trying to prove here. Of course no one is saying women are not equal to men or should not be in our society. But when it comes to physical strength, it is an undeniably fact that men are stronger and any form of tweaking the rules to circumvent that fact will lead to silliness and will cause harm not good.

I'm sure that if you ever run out of fuel while driving it will be you pushing the car not your wife or daughter.


None of that makes sense to me. Who says 'they' need to decide once and for all? And decide what exactly? No one but you is talking about a free-for-all without categories and divisions. Besides we tinker with those continually, what's tad more adjusting?

Of course men and women are physically different, some of us have pussies and tits, some of us have dicks and balls. But athletics don't involve or require either. Only history and prejudices make them relevant at all.

Please point out any left-wing rhetoric you'd like us to stop using. For myself, I'd appreciate you not repeatedly dragging that political dead-horse in here. All I'm talking about and advocating is that any and all athletes who are reasonably equally matched should be allowed to compete with each other. As an athletic descriptor, gender is as irrelevant as 'race'. No politics in that, right or left.

Why should anyone's gender be a matter of concern to anyone but them and who they have sex with? It's how fast they are or how high they can jump.
"Please point out any left-wing rhetoric you'd like us to stop using." I just pointed it out, in bold letters. It's invented by the left and now considered as holy truth sang from the hymn sheet of liberal religion. Some people will not agree with that statement and will be called racists and bigots. Athletes do need balls, they need testosterone for strength and endurance!!! It's reality, wishing that gravity doesn't exist, and that we should be able to jump tall buildings , if we only had super powers is fantasy.

Having balls is an advantage in sports. There is no other way around it!
 
Toronto Escorts