Toronto Escorts

SPs posting numbers on the internet

The "Bone" Ranger

tits lover
Aug 5, 2006
4,229
29
48
I have been noticing more and more SPs posting customer numbers on the internet.

We should probably have a running list of SPs (in a thread) that resort to this type of behaviour as it is totally unacceptable? I know that I would avoid any SP that has the potential to do so.

Thoughts?
 

Hungry101

Active member
Jun 23, 2008
309
40
28
My understanding is that there already are sections of TERB/MERB/PERB that only advertisers have access to. This is where agencies and indies can report problem clients. This ought to be enough I think.

Yes, this could be helpful. I want to avoid any escort that breaks the code by outing a client.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
17,885
12,294
113
It's a free for all on Twitter and anyone who dares go against the ladies is blocked. This is why one should never give their real info or picture but men think with their dicks as opposed to common sense.

I agree a list of the offending providers should be compiled so we can avoid them like the plague.
 

Jasmine Raine

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2014
4,049
48
48
My understanding is that there already are sections of TERB/MERB/PERB that only advertisers have access to. This is where agencies and indies can report problem clients. This ought to be enough I think.

Yes, this could be helpful. I want to avoid any escort that breaks the code by outing a client.
They are not searchable and only available to paid advertisers. There are way more SPs on Twitter then TERB. More then half the women in Toronto who work don't even know about TERB. Sorry but TERB is not enough.


Some of the postings on Twitter, I don't agree with. Some I do. You rape a girl, assault a girl, you forfeit your right to discretion. I have seen actual video of assaults, and robberies going down as it happens. That kind of stuff posted on Twitter, I have no problem with.

A guy pulling a no show then having his face, number, work info plastered all over twitter I don't agree with.

But just like you guys screen, so should women be able to. And as far as I'm.concerned, I equally give my personal info if not more then what I ask for. I will always promote screening. For both sides.

Do your homework on the other party and you have a better chance at a successful session.
 

The "Bone" Ranger

tits lover
Aug 5, 2006
4,229
29
48
Some of the postings on Twitter, I don't agree with. Some I do. You rape a girl, assault a girl, you forfeit your right to discretion. I have seen actual video of assaults, and robberies going down as it happens. That kind of stuff posted on Twitter, I have no problem with.

.
Those incidents should be reported to the police and I have no tolerance for that behaviour.
 

Jasmine Raine

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2014
4,049
48
48
Those incidents should be reported to the police and I have no tolerance for that behaviour.
And just like a guy comes here to report being robbed by an escort instead of going to the police and risking causing more personal harm to themselves, a lady in those circumstance reports the same to twitter.

But you guys say ANY report on Twitter is wrong. Being completely unfair and unequal to both sides.
 

The "Bone" Ranger

tits lover
Aug 5, 2006
4,229
29
48
And just like a guy comes here to report being robbed by an escort instead of going to the police and risking causing more personal harm to themselves, a lady in those circumstance reports the same to twitter.

But you guys say ANY report on Twitter is wrong. Being completely unfair and unequal to both sides.
You are not understanding, they are reporting guys' numbers over non-violent issues, you seem to condoning their behaviour based on your posts.
 

Jasmine Raine

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2014
4,049
48
48
You are not understanding, they are reporting guys' numbers over non-violent issues, you seem to condoning their behaviour based on your posts.
Why are you not reading?

Read the second paragraph in my first reply. What part of that is condoning non-violent outtings of info?

Read the third paragraph. I said outting a guy who pulled a no-show I think is wrong.
 

boomboom

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2003
5,449
3,749
113
Central Ont. between here & there
as most things between 2 people, there normally is 3 stories.... his, hers & combo of the 2 to make the true story.
JR is very correct on the SP on Twitter & never hearing of TERB. There are so many sites that a SP could advt on, its mind blowing. Some are more localized & cover parts of the Province better, while others are filled with drama. 1 SP I saw advt on 6 sites.....
Now as far as outing clients, constant txt messages or vulgar comments.... no. But for protection if they have been assaulted, raped or robbed with violence. different story. Many of the SP I know do have a network of other SP they know or trust & share privately as needed or other things. Many boards also have a private area for advt to use & share info or concerns over clients.
As in this day with social media, many people share way to much, sometimes because of frustration, emotions, happy moments, sad moments, etc.

just my thoughts
 
There's currently a post on Twitter about a banker, or someone posing as one using a Linkedin profile, that's passing off counterfeit bills. He claims to be from Baltimore, tried targeting another lady in DC, who would have seen him if not for that post as he passed her screening. Apparently he's using another name on a Sugar Daddy site saying he's from Arizona. You can see how limiting this to one site in one area doesn't solve the problem.

This is fraud, theft and rape as she consented with payment, which she didn't receive.

She and her assistant both tried contacting him using several different methods to resolve the issue, which he completely ignored. Only then did they turn to SM.

The double standard by some members on this and other boards is alive and well!
 

G.D. Gentleman

Spin Spin Sugar...
Jun 24, 2019
2,543
1,822
113
I have been noticing more and more SPs posting customer numbers on the internet.

We should probably have a running list of SPs (in a thread) that resort to this type of behaviour as it is totally unacceptable? I know that I would avoid any SP that has the potential to do so.

Thoughts?
-Use a second phone number/burner phone to be extra safe.
-Countless options in the GTA that never need to see your photo ahead of booking (screening process) - as seen in the thousands of reviews here on TERB - agency ladies and indies.

Most of all - be a gentleman. Don't be 'that guy' who harasses a lady, no shows without a reason (i.e. traffic delay, emergency, even a made up excuse if you must), treat the lady poorly, etc. 99% of the outings you see online started with the man acting poorly to some degree and the 1% that you see through as a revenge outing - you can only hope it's his burner number that is being listed.


Sir Ranger - I suspect your many years of experience demonstrate you understand how to behave so I suspect you have nothing to worry about. That said, this thread is appreciated to generate conversation about this new trend we are seeing - my thoughts in summary is hobby smart and behave properly at all times will leave you nothing to worry about.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
17,885
12,294
113
And just like a guy comes here to report being robbed by an escort instead of going to the police and risking causing more personal harm to themselves, a lady in those circumstance reports the same to twitter.

But you guys say ANY report on Twitter is wrong. Being completely unfair and unequal to both sides.
If we go to the police to complain under Bill C36 we can be charged for attempting to pay for sex. The provider cannot!

I blame the john for lacking common sense and providing details more than the provider. All it takes is one crazy. The most reliable person can have something trigger them to become unstable or be arrested and their data compromised.

Why have one's personal info shared in an activity that at the present time can ruin one's life?
 

Jasmine Raine

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2014
4,049
48
48
If we go to the police to complain under Bill C36 we can be charged for attempting to pay for sex. The provider cannot!

I blame the john for lacking common sense and providing details more than the provider. All it takes is one crazy. The most reliable person can have something trigger them to become unstable or be arrested and their data compromised.

Why have one's personal info shared in an activity that at the present time can ruin one's life?
There are still laws that SPs can get charged with as well.

And thanks for your vote of confidence. It's good to know that one day I can be triggered or arrested and whatever else that will make me comprise my clients. Appreciate it.
 
Last edited:
There are still laws that SPs can get charged with as well.
And thanks for your vote of confidence. It's good to know that one day I can be triggered or arrested and whatever else that will make me comprise my clients. Appreciate it.
Come on JR, don't you know that every male, especially those on the board(s) is sane and trustworthy and that all of us females regardless of profession are emotional halfwits that could go ballistic at any moment? You must not have gotten the memo via PM from the very vocal minority that monopolize the lounge here. Many of which by their own admission are retired or semi retired from hobbying but still feel the need to educate the masses on a daily basis. This is why many of us choose not to advertise here anymore or advertise here but stay as far away from the lounge area as possible.
 
Last edited:

The "Bone" Ranger

tits lover
Aug 5, 2006
4,229
29
48
I saw an SP (I won't name her) on Twitter this morning who posted a shot of her cell phone showing a message from a guy who asked her if she'd give him 20 minutes for $50. I understand that she was offended by that message and I understand why she was offended there was no threat of any kind and the shot included the guy's phone number. That's totally unacceptable behaviour on the part of the SP in my opinion.
And I bet she was never criticized by anybody for demonstrating such behaviour?
 

Lovely_Lovelynn

Toronto GFE & PSE Companion
Jul 7, 2018
390
71
28
Toronto
onlyfans.com
No shows happen. It's part of the business. Just like when I was a hairstylist, people would sometimes book and not show up for various reasons. I believe the best thing to do, is request a e transfer deposit if the person tries to book again, or just block the #

When a client books with you, whether he shows up or not, part of the service he's paying for is discretion.

I've had many high profile clients, (famous actors, athletes, rappers/musicians and businessmen alike) and have signed non-disclosures to ensure their peace of mind and privacy.

The ONLY time I agree it is appropriate to forewarn, NOT expose, any information is when the client has forced services, actually robbed, or assaulted.

Discretion for clients I believe is possibly more important than SP's, because they have a lot more to lose materially if their wife finds out, or their career is tarnished publicly.

That's just my opinion though.
 

Grimnul

Well-known member
May 15, 2018
1,482
27
48
I don’t really get why anyone would have a problem with what Jessica said. Seems pretty reasonable to me. Violent clients should be outed, I assume they’re often reported to the police as well, though I can certainly understand why an SP might be hesitant to work with law enforce the in any way. Clients who no-show or are just time wasters, exposing them accomplishes very little and is basically just vindictive and should never be done.

The other big issue is that aside from the discretion aspect, girls who out guys like that are actually making things worse for everyone involved in the industry, client and provider. If lots of girls expose clients over relatively minor issues, clients become far more hesitant to be screened, and that can put SPs in potentially dangerous situations. I understand the impulse to want to expose someone who no-shows, that’s shitty behavior and is costing you money, but people need to look at the bigger picture. We’re all in this together, if clients and SPs begin acting antagonistically towards each other, it just makes things more difficult for everyone involved.

Guys, don’t be assholes, ladies, don’t be vindictive. We need each other to make this work.
 

peter4025

Active member
Mar 10, 2010
6,258
11
38
And just like a guy comes here to report being robbed by an escort instead of going to the police and risking causing more personal harm to themselves, a lady in those circumstance reports the same to twitter.

But you guys say ANY report on Twitter is wrong. Being completely unfair and unequal to both sides.
Is not the same, guys can get charged if they go to the cops.
 

whiteshaft

Been Around
Mar 15, 2014
1,783
251
83
Room 38DD
If we go to the police to complain under Bill C36 we can be charged for attempting to pay for sex. The provider cannot!

I blame the john for lacking common sense and providing details more than the provider. All it takes is one crazy. The most reliable person can have something trigger them to become unstable or be arrested and their data compromised.

Why have one's personal info shared in an activity that at the present time can ruin one's life?
Is it probable that an increasing number of hobbyists might quit the hobby due to the potential tragedy this will induce (particularly those who are in a relationship)? It would only hurt the industry.
 
Some interesting posts on Twitter:

A sex worker once observed that guys with high powered jobs tend to screen without drama. At first that surprised me, but then it didn't. Decision-makers are used to realistically evaluating risks - and understanding the other party's exigencies.

I have also found that successful men are inherently risk takers. The only way to get ahead in this world, in addition to having generational wealth, is by taking risks. Losers don't take risks and that's why they are losers.

Through that lens, screening is a no brainier. The risk that a provider will misuse your information is nil - doxxing clients isn't good for business. On the flip side, she needs to screen for non-negotiable physical safety. Moral is, screen like a boss.

How many of these ladies posting numbers willy nilly are serious business women/screeners or plan on being in this industry for any length of time? I'm guessing not many. Do your homework and you shouldn't have any problems.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts