SPs posting numbers on the internet
- Thread starter The "Bone" Ranger
- Start date
Awesome, and John's love to avoid whining Twitter ladysplainers! Now if you don't mind I have a bowl of Cocoa Puffs waiting for me.
I don’t agree with publicly outing clients on Twitter.
If he committed a crime then certainly the police should be called.
If he was a no show...or argumentative...or a problem in some other non-criminal way there are bad client lists that only escorts can access that sex workers can use to alert one another about bad clients.
In my view, the only purpose served in publicly outing a client is for the sex worker to exact her own vigilante justice by whipping up a mob on social media. I believe there is no place for that in the industry and any sex worker who does that should be avoided like the plague.
If he committed a crime then certainly the police should be called.
If he was a no show...or argumentative...or a problem in some other non-criminal way there are bad client lists that only escorts can access that sex workers can use to alert one another about bad clients.
In my view, the only purpose served in publicly outing a client is for the sex worker to exact her own vigilante justice by whipping up a mob on social media. I believe there is no place for that in the industry and any sex worker who does that should be avoided like the plague.
too bad they arent being called out here
but as was said in another thread..Twitter is becoming better than review boards for filtering out the ones to avoid
Did you know that a bowl of Lucky Charms is better than Cocoa Puffs if you use chocolate milk?
Is this Blah, blah, blah?
https://twitter.com/lilblondebabyy/status/1151072191200595968
Is this wrong to post on twitter?
Give us your opinion please.
She should take the same photos to the police and the animal if proven he committed the assault which I'm not doubting he did deserves to spend time in a cage.
This is not a "time waster", you're comparing apples and lemons.
Her post says she should have screened. You disagree with screening and say that a woman like her should not be seen because she screens.
So if she doesn't screen she gets assaulted. If she does screen she has haters like yourself saying she should not be seen. If she posts about it, she is posting a guys info she should not be trusted with personal info. It is a lose lose lose for her. How is that fair?
You know my point is valid. You and others always speak in absolutes with your statements. It is always "ALL" indies who screen should be avoid. This thread started as an absolute about women who post numbers and personal info on Twitter and took me, Sophia and a few other gentlemen to change the tone back to what it should be.
If you have a non-violent client, he should be reported to one of the many bad client lists
If it is a violent offence, the SP should hopefully report it to police but also posting about what happen with some of his details to warn other ladies is ok.
And
If you want to see an indie, do you research. Search reviews, her site, her ads, GIS, her twitter and see if you feel comfortable with her screening policy. If you are not, move on to another lady you are more comfortable with.
Not "Don't go see indies at all".
That is always the first statement from you guys. And then you start to say, "not you Jess". Or "I was not talking about escorts like you Sophia".
You should not be speaking in absolutes at all. Then you wouldn't have to backtrack and make concessions to your original statement all the time.
I included both. Don't deflect the valid points.
Besides, I didn't bring up screening first in this thread so take your bone and go pick it with someone else.
To be clear, I 1000% do not agree with posting non-violent client info. I 1000% do not believe a guy who does not feel comfortable screening is a loser. I don't think a guy who does want to pay higher rates is cheap. I'm not one of those girls.
I do believe guys 1000% have the right to choose what works for them.
My only issue is with the absolute statements often made lumping all SPs together. And I have issue with men who consistently bitch about an SPs policies or pricing and doesn't just move on.
Hope that is clear.
I do believe guys 1000% have the right to choose what works for them.
My only issue is with the absolute statements often made lumping all SPs together. And I have issue with men who consistently bitch about an SPs policies or pricing and doesn't just move on.
Hope that is clear.
They are not valid points so just move on, you know the point of this thread (and guys don't need to get screened to see a nice girl that provides good service but that is not the point of this thread).
Bitch to squeezer. He started talking about screening info in post 12 on page one. I'm replying. So again, take your bone and go pick it with him. He likes to jump in any thread and diss anything screening any chance he gets.so tell him to stop, not me.
This was the tweet before it: https://twitter.com/lilblondebabyy/status/1151072013756325888
It goes back to one of our earlier exchanges that you took offense to. You could know a guy's exact address and know him personally, if he is a psycho, all the screening in the world will not help.
I am not aware people here in general disagree
with screening. I think people are just against divulging
personal identity information to a SP they have never met
which no one in his right mind would do.
Please stop trying to change the topic. The thread is about outing clients on Twitter.
