Toronto Escorts

SPs posting numbers on the internet

The "Bone" Ranger

tits lover
Aug 5, 2006
4,229
29
48
I would add that any kind of negativity towards your clients affect your image. Think twice before throwing a tentrum on Twitter.
I have said this before as well but an SP's posts there are way more informative than her reviews here. I have personally seen a correlation between positive posts and great service levels. Isabelle you are an example! :)
 

Grimnul

Well-known member
May 15, 2018
1,482
27
48
I just bought 9 boxes of various U.S.-only cereals online. I may have a problem.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
17,886
12,295
113
You guys and your cereal phobias
Cant we all just get along

FYI...it took me years to get those trix and ill be damned if Im gonna give'em up cus of some court order
You need to slowly pull away. Tomorrow morning pour only half a cup of Trix into your bowl and 2 fingers of milk. Next day a quarter cup and 1 finger of milk.

Hold on, OH NO, God Dammit! I think last nights sugar baby walked away with my box of cocoa puffs! Nooooooo, what now?

I just bought 9 boxes of various U.S.-only cereals online. I may have a problem.
You're sick!
 

Grimnul

Well-known member
May 15, 2018
1,482
27
48
You need to slowly pull away. Tomorrow morning pour only half a cup of Trix into your bowl and 2 fingers of milk. Next day a quarter cup and 1 finger of milk.

Hold on, OH NO, God Dammit! I think last nights sugar baby walked away with my box of cocoa puffs! Nooooooo, what now?



You're sick!
People will assume I’m joking. I’m actually really not. I genuinely have 9 boxes of cereal that will be arriving at my door sometime next week.

Did you know there’s a limited-edition Cap’n Crunch cotton candy flavor? Cinnamon Toast Crunch Churros. Fruity Pebbles with Marshmallows. Sour Patch Kids cereal. I couldn’t not try those. Of course, I grabbed a box of Crunchberry (the all berry kind), and Trix while I was at it. Also got a box of the limited-edition Froot Loops with marshmallows.

I might die next week.
 

thumper18474

Well-known member
You need to slowly pull away. Tomorrow morning pour only half a cup of Trix into your bowl and 2 fingers of milk. Next day a quarter cup and 1 finger of milk.
!
Easier said than done
I was once a Lucky Charms guy
happy go lucky not a care in the world....used to pick out the green clovers and save them for last to enjoy
then it was just a few more .....then a few more.....and before I knew it I was opening boxes in the store and stealing the Green clovers,,,,I...I was hooked
then that fucker of a leprechaun posted on Twitter that I had a problem and since then I've been blacklisted from every store..but with a lot of help I kicked the habit and now enjoy all those colourful Trix
until those meddling kids files that injunction against me
I get them on the Black market now pay atleast double the going rate but ...hey I want what I want
 

Jasmine Raine

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2014
4,049
48
48
And here, I think, is an important point of disagreement. Yes, SPs have the right to screen and charge high rates. But so are the terbies have the right to tell other guys not to see SPs who screen too heavy or charge too high rates. So, my problem now is that Jessica has a problem with our right to say that clients should avoid certain type of SPs. I guess, next step would be for someone to have a problem with my statement above.
ALL men, yourself included, who don’t want to screen, are just trying to rape or rob an SP. They should be avoided at all cost.

For all the clueless men in the room, this is not truly how I feel, this is just how stupid it sounds to lump a whole group of people together. Which is what my issue is, not the right of a client to “discuss” SPs among yourselves. Big difference between the two
 

Rummy

Active member
Jun 5, 2014
89
26
28
You do what works for you! I’ll post on twitter as I wish, you have no say about anyone else’s worthiness but your own.
 
You are not understanding, they are reporting guys' numbers over non-violent issues, you seem to condoning their behaviour based on your posts.
Some girls seem to consider "non-payment" to be the equivalent of an assault or a rape, which is a bit much. In my business, if someone doesn't pay a bill, it's a civil, credit issue. I don't call 9-1-1 to report a delinquent account as if I were being robbed at gun-point.

I guess as clients, we need to choose... See women (usually indies) who insist on legit verification of our identities, or book through agencies or "lesser-known" women, who don't worry as much. I have a relatively high profile in the civi world and I'd no more give full ID to some random chick on the Internet than I'd freely give a DNA sample to the cops for no reason. I value my privacy. I've mentioned this before as well, that so many women seem to be constantly losing their phones etc., so even if their "intent" is to keep our information private, I'm not confident that that's always going to be the case.

My point is that having a burner number for booking is fine for the vast majority of agencies, MPs and even most Indy ladies. That I choose not to give up my real number is NOT an indicator that I am a violent predator. It's merely a sign that I am concerned about my privacy and my willingness to divulge my details to a "stranger".
 
It is not some girls who think this. It is judges too. There was literally just a case posted recently about this. Sorry to burst your bubble on that one bud.
I'd appreciate it if you could cite the source for your claim. I may be wrong, but I find it difficult to imagine that a judge would equate failing to pay a sex worker with raping or otherwise assaulting one. I will happily eat crow if you can show me a link to a reputable news source, but just because you say it's so doesn't convince me. (No offense!)

I sincerely mean no disrespect, but "I read it on the Internet" isn't proof of authenticity.
 

Jasmine Raine

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2014
4,049
48
48
I'd appreciate it if you could cite the source for your claim. I may be wrong, but I find it difficult to imagine that a judge would equate failing to pay a sex worker with raping or otherwise assaulting one. I will happily eat crow if you can show me a link to a reputable news source, but just because you say it's so doesn't convince me. (No offense!)

I sincerely mean no disrespect, but "I read it on the Internet" isn't proof of authenticity.
I went to look for the case and could not find it which why I deleted my post until I could. I would not expect anyone to just take my word for it. Again, why I deleted my comment until I could find the tweet linking the story.

The most recent case I found was a man convicted of rape for taking the condom off with an SP. Which I will say that many here don't think is rape either. But I digress.
 

rhuarc29

Well-known member
Apr 15, 2009
9,591
1,194
113
This is a tough one. I think that in the age of social media, we have to be very, very careful with what we post. I don't really agree with public shaming until a crime is proven, and that goes for outside the industry as well as in.

Human beings are ruled by perspective, which is further skewed by emotion. Anyone who has watched divorce proceedings between two friends should have some inkling of what I'm talking about. Two otherwise good people can turn into two monsters hell-bent on destroying one another.

While I would trust some SPs I know to make the appropriate call on what is worthy of public outing, I don't have that level of trust with most, including some SPs I'm very fond of. What is worthy of a public outing that could jeopardize a person's livelihood will depend on the SP. I think most would consider the heinous crime of rape to be worthy. But what about petty theft? What about a condom breaking that the SP felt was intentional? What if a client perhaps pushed boundaries? What about lack of hygiene? Or rudeness?

What if the client and SP got in an argument and the SP thought to use a public outing as leverage? Not all SPs are as professional as those on this board.

So I am very, very leery of making public shaming an acceptable thing.
 
I went to look for the case and could not find it which why I deleted my post until I could. I would not expect anyone to just take my word for it. Again, why I deleted my comment until I could find the tweet linking the story.

The most recent case I found was a man convicted of rape for taking the condom off with an SP. Which I will say that many here don't think is rape either. But I digress.
Fair enough... And regarding the yanking the condom off, I'm not sure what that is either, but certainly some sort of an assault as there was no consent. Interestingly, I have had two civilian women do that to me over many years. It was kinda weird. Maybe they wanted my baby... ;-)
 

Jasmine Raine

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2014
4,049
48
48
Fair enough... And regarding the yanking the condom off, I'm not sure what that is either, but certainly some sort of an assault as there was no consent. Interestingly, I have had two civilian women do that to me over many years. It was kinda weird. Maybe they wanted my baby... ;-)
Wow. I'm sorry to hear that. It is 1000% a sexual assault. Regardless of industry or civilian sex.

I do wish people would stop doing that. On both sides of the sexes. Or things like poking holes in condoms. It is a very sick selfish act that was too many feel is "no big deal".

But I should let this thread get back on topic before I get an earful from Bone Ranger. If/when I find the link to the first case of non-payment, I will PM it to you. If interested still.
 

autumn96

Member
Jun 13, 2017
481
16
18
The fact that this is a debate is why I use a second phone number most people in my 'normal' life would not be able to identify me by when booking with SPs.

Most SPs aren't going to cause problems but all you need is one who will and you've got lots of 'splainin to do at home or at work.
 

Grimnul

Well-known member
May 15, 2018
1,482
27
48
Pulling a condom off is 100% a form of sexual assault. It’s a pretty simple conclusion to arrive at if you think about it logically. Consent is contextual. Consent is given to one particular person under a particular set of circumstances, and may come with restrictions. In this case, consent was given for sex if a condom is used. If the condom is removed, that is non-consensual sex act, because it violates the parameters under which consent was given.

It is absolutely a big deal, and no one, male or female, should ever be doing it.
 

ElizabethLively

New member
Jul 10, 2019
17
0
0
All I have to say humans can do whatever they please and no one other than law enforcement has the right to tell them otherwise and if you have an issue with it then move right along.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
17,886
12,295
113
All I have to say humans can do whatever they please and no one other than law enforcement has the right to tell them otherwise and if you have an issue with it then move right along.
Exactly so if we want to rant about intrusive screening, ridiculous rates and construct a list of ladies that out people for non violent events we have the right to do so. We agree, isn't that awesome!
 
Toronto Escorts