Toronto Escorts

Trump tells Democratic women of colour to leave U.S. in 'racist and disgusting' tweet

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
25,136
3,572
113
Well.....well, what do we have here :biggrin1:

https://canadafreepress.com/article...ics-complaint-against-rep.-ilhan-omar-over-po

Judicial Watch announced today that it hand-delivered ethics complaint to Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Office of Congressional Ethics David Skaggs calling for a full investigation into potential crimes tied to allegations that Rep. Ilhan Omar may have married her biological brother.

“The evidence is overwhelming Rep. Omar may have violated the law and House rules. The House of Representatives must urgently investigate and resolve the serious allegations of wrongdoing by Rep. Omar,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “We encourage Americans to share their views on Rep. Omar’s apparent misconduct with their congressmen.”
 

PornAddict

Active member
Aug 30, 2009
3,620
0
36
60
Ethics Complaint Filed Against Rep. Ilhan Omar; Accused Of Immigration, Tax And Student Loan Fraud

Following an extensive three-year investigation into Rep. Ilhan Omar by investigative journalist David Steinberg, a House ethics complaint has been filed by Judicial Watch calling for a probe into potential crimes committed by Omar and her brother.




According to the complaint, "Substantial, compelling and, to date, unrefuted evidence has been uncovered that Rep. Ilhan Omar may have committed the following crimes in violation of both federal law and Minnesota state law: perjury, immigration fraud, marriage fraud, state and federal tax fraud, and federal student loan fraud."

https://youtu.be/UvbwxRAW8n


"The evidence is overwhelming Rep. Omar may have violated the law and House rules. The House of Representatives must urgently investigate and resolve the serious allegations of wrongdoing by Rep. Omar," said Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton. "We encourage Americans to share their views on Rep. Omar’s apparent misconduct with their congressmen."

Laid out in the complaint, as compiled in Steinberg's research:

Rep. Ilhan Abdullahi Omar, a citizen of the United States, married her biological brother, Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, a citizen of the United Kingdom, in 2009, presumably as part of an immigration fraud scheme. The couple legally divorced in 2017. In the course of that divorce, Ms. Omar submitted an “Application for an Order for Service by Alternate Means” to the State of Minnesota on August 2, 2017 and claimed, among other things, that she had had no contact with Ahmed Nur Said Elmi after June 2011. She also claimed that she did know where to find him. The evidence developed by Mr. Steinberg and his colleagues demonstrates with a high degree of certainty that Ms. Omar not only had contact with Mr. Elmi, but actually met up with him in London in 2015, which is supported by photographic evidence. Ms. Omar signed the “Application for an Order for Service by Alternate Means” under penalty of perjury. The very document that Ilham Omar signed on August 2, 2017 bears the following notation directly above her signature: “I declare under penalty of perjury that everything I have stated in this document is true and correct. Minn. Stat. § 358.116.”

Of particular importance are archived photographs taken during a widely reported trip by Ilhan Omar to London in 2015, posted to her own Instagram account under her nickname “hameey”, in which she poses with her husband/presumed brother, Ahmed Elmi. These photographs from 2015 are documentary evidence that in fact she met up with Mr. Elmi after June 2011 and before the date she signed the divorce document in August 2017, thereby calling into question the veracity of her claim that she had not seen Mr. Elmi since June 2011.

Rep. Omar’s potential crimes far exceed perjurious statements made in a Minnesota court filing.

Rep. Omar’s conduct may include immigration fraud. It appears that Rep. Omar married her brother in order to assist his emigration to the United Stated from the United Kingdom. The same immigration fraud scheme may have aided Mr. Elmi in obtaining federally-backed student loans for his attendance at North Dakota State University. Mr. Elmi and Rep. Omar simultaneously attended North Dakota State University and may have derived illicit benefits predicated on the immigration fraud scheme.

The State of Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board has already determined that Rep. Omar violated state campaign finance laws for improper use of campaign funds. She was forced to reimburse her campaign thousands of dollars. More significantly, the Board discovered that the federal tax returns submitted by Rep. Omar for 2014 and 2015 were filed as “joint” tax returns with a man who was not her husband, named Ahmed Hirsi, while she was actually married to Ahmed Elmi.

Under federal law, specifically, 26 U.S. Code & 7206.1, “Any person who willfully makes and subscribes any return, statement, or other document, which contains or is verified by a written declaration that it is made under the penalties of perjury, and which he does not believe to be true and correct as to every material matter … shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $100,000 ($500,000 in the case of a corporation), or imprisoned not more than 3 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution.” -Judicial Watch








STeinberg sums up the evidence (also via PowerLineBlog):

Verifiable UK and U.S. marriage records
Verifiable address records
Time-stamped, traceable, archived online communications (Convictions and settlements based upon social media evidence are commonplace, Anthony Weiner being a notable example)
Background check confirmations of SSNs and birthdates
Archived court documents signed under penalty of perjury
Photos which can be examined to rule out digital manipulation
The 2019 Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board investigation, which found Omar filed illegal joint tax returns with a man who was not her husband in at least 2014 and 2015
Three years’ of evidence published across many articles — none of which has been shown to be incorrect, or have even been challenged with contradictory evidence from Rep. Omar or any other source
Perjury evidence that stands on its own — regardless of whom she married:
Long after June 2011, she was clearly in contact with the only man in either the U.S. or the UK with the same name and birthdate as the man she married. She was clearly in contact with several people who were in contact with him.
Further, Preya Samsundar did contact him, published how she managed to contact him, and published his email admitting to being photographed with Omar in London in 2015. To be clear: Omar was legally married to an “Ahmed Nur Said Elmi” at the time she was photographed next to a man who admits his name is Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, and that he is in the photo.
Samsundar published all of this information on how to contact Ahmed Nur Said Elmi a few months before Omar swore to that nine-question court document.
Rep. Omar has refused all inquiries from her constituents, elected officials, and media outlets to provide any specific evidence contradicting even a single allegation suggested by three years of now-public information.
In fact, Omar has responded by making information less available:
In August 2016, after Scott Johnson and Preya Samsundar posted the allegations, Omar’s verified social media accounts were taken offline.
Ahmed Nur Said Elmi’s social media accounts were also taken offline.
When the accounts returned, a large amount of potentially incriminating evidence had verifiably been deleted.
I found and published at least ten additional “before and after” instances of evidence still being deleted in 2018.
Omar has released carefully worded, Clintonian statements that denigrate those seeking answers from her as racists. Yet she has repeatedly refused to answer questions or issue anything other than public relations statements.
I have a large amount of information that we have not published for reasons including the protection of sources.
Sources have expressed fear regarding published video and photo evidence confirming threats from Omar’s campaign team. These sources have shared other evidence of threats. I have contacted the federal authorities to share this and other unpublished information. Providing knowingly false information to the DOJ is a serious crime.
According to Steinberg, "I believe Scott Johnson, Preya Samsundar, and me, with our three years of articles, columns and posts, have provided more than enough evidence to give law enforcement authorities probable cause to open an investigation. Now would be the chance for law enforcement, and especially for Rep. Ilhan Omar’s House colleagues, to make a sincere stand against corruption and for the uniform application of the law."


https://youtu.be/8T4N5I4hxag
 

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
6,793
2,787
113
LOL...WTF is “Judicial Watch?” I can’t even be bothered to google it.

This reminds me of another crackpot story on Twitter: Some trump supporting dork went down to the local police station in the county where the Clintons reside and filed a “formal complaint” demanding that the police go out and arrest Hillary Clinton immediately! He got a friend to film him reading his complaint letter in the police station and then he posted it on social media like it was some giant moment in history...the cops were just staring at him trying not to laugh. LMAO...Brilliant!

These people are kooks...and the fact that you endorse them automatically makes you a kook too.


:rofl:
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,703
21
38
Not all skin folk are kin folk. This is how I know you don't understand what's at play, Kat. There are quite a few people who compromise their morals and dignity to see what they can get. Only the compromised can get played by that too bit conman. Trump has a long history of racism dating back to the 70s. You're saying he's changed, despite all the evidence to the contrary despite him throwing a bone here and there to shut some people up? ;-)
Trump doesn't not have a history of racism. Stop repeating lies.

He was celebrated by people of all colors for decades.... until he ran for president.
 

mellowjello

Well-known member
Jan 11, 2017
2,444
913
113
LOL...WTF is “Judicial Watch?” I can’t even be bothered to google it.

This reminds me of another crackpot story on Twitter: Some trump supporting dork went down to the local police station in the county where the Clintons reside and filed a “formal complaint” demanding that the police go out and arrest Hillary Clinton immediately! He got a friend to film him reading his complaint letter in the police station and then he posted it on social media like it was some giant moment in history...the cops were just staring at him trying not to laugh. LMAO...Brilliant!

These people are kooks...and the fact that you endorse them automatically makes you a kook too.


:rofl:
I googled them as soon as I read this.
Some ultra right wing conservative foundation / tabloid. Fox on steroids.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,331
5,556
113
150 UK MPs and peers accuse Trump of 'fascist tendencies' and tell Ilhan Omar: 'We are with you'

Almost 150 British MPs and peers have condemned Donald Trump's racist comments and expressed their support for the Democrat congresswomen who were the subject of his attack.

Politicians from Labour, the Conservatives, the SNP, the Liberal Democrats, Change UK and the Green Party condemned the US president's attack on Minnesota representative Ilhan Omar and other women of colour in the House of Representatives.

They said Mr Trump's “outright racist and dangerous” comments were "abhorrent" and claimed that his "fascist tendencies...have been silently accepted" for too long.

The unprecedented statement came after Mr Trump provoked outrage by claiming that several unnamed Democrat congresswomen of colour should "go back" to the countries he suggested they had come from.

The backlash grew after supporters of the Republican chanted "send her home" when he criticised Ms Omar at a rally on Wednesday.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...ilhan-omar-uk-mps-lords-twitter-a9011421.html

In other words Trump is a racist!!
 

Darts

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2017
23,061
11,160
113
Question: Where else on this planet can Miss Omar enjoy the life she is currently living in big bad America?
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,495
11
38
Question: Where else on this planet can Miss Omar enjoy the life she is currently living in big bad America?
Except for the 'being elected to Congress' part, life here and in most of the G7 — even the G20 — can be pretty much the same. Maybe even better.

But she's American, doing the best she can to improve that place. It's why she stepped up in spite of the predictable abuse, and got elected by a majority of people who voted. The man complaining about her cannot say as much.
 

doggystyle99

Well-known member
May 23, 2010
7,906
1,205
113
FALSE!!! The black vote was about 5% for Republicans from 2004 to 2012. Trump got 3% more in 2016 which is impressive given the fact the media tries to consistently portray him as a "racist".
His approval right now among blacks is even higher than 8%, and if many blacks turnout to vote in 2020 Trump will win in a landslide
INCORRECT
The Black American votes for Republicans in the general election in 2004 was 11% which is higher than what it was for Trump's first election at 8% in 2016.
The Black American votes for Republicans in the general election in 2008 was 4% which is lower than what it was for Trump but in 2008 almost all the Black American voters voted for Obama
And in 2012 the Black American votes for republicans was 6%

On average between 2004-2012 votes for Republicans in the General elections amongst Black American voters was 7% only 1% lower than what it was for Trump. You conviniently only went back to 2004 because in 2000 it was 9% and in 1996 it was 12%.

Whether you like to believe in the facts or not his support amongst Black American voters has gone down and is dwindling, and whether you like to believe in the facts or not 8% is not great support when there was already support amongst Republicans which was higher than his measly 8% which is dwindling.
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
25,136
3,572
113
On average between 2004-2012 votes for Republicans in the General elections amongst Black American voters was 7% only 1% lower than what it was for Trump
There you go, so Trump still got 1% more.

Thanks doggy :thumb:
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,703
21
38
The anti-Trumpsters want to die on the hill they set out several years ago. They jumped the gun by mischaracterizing the man early in his campaign, and ever since then they've tried to save face by doubling down on lies. Very sad.
 

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
6,793
2,787
113
Well.....well....pot, kettle, black?? :nod:
She is responding sarcastically to a politician who was talking about deporting Muslims.

Kinda obvious....If you wanna avoiding embarrassing moments like this in the future I would suggest resisting urges to re-post from canadaman.
 

Insidious Von

My head is my home
Sep 12, 2007
38,085
6,422
113
The worst that can happen to a nation is to eat itself from within, that's what happened to Yugoslavia almost immediately after Tito's passing. By continuously playing the division card, Trump is weakening America from within - Putin is very happy.

As a side note the upcoming Canadian election will be Shiva Scheer's to lose. He's going to get plenty of help from Russia and China. Scheer will gleefully accept it, he did not take the McCain route when one of his supporters called Trudeau a pedophile.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9goS1nHM_-E
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
25,136
3,572
113
She is responding sarcastically to a politician who was talking about deporting Muslims.

Kinda obvious....
Not obvious at all. You have no idea what emotion she put into that tweet
 
Toronto Escorts