A third of women only date men for the free food

Apparently she had a Japanese sushi restaurant in mind.

Hence the expression "meal ticket". I've got a story. Years ago, I got a date from the singles section of the newspaper. Japanese woman. I showed up 30 seconds late and saw this bandy legged little Japanese woman with a perm toddling away from our agreed rendezvous street corner at top speed. I caught up to her and asked "Yoko?" or whatever her friggin name was. She said "yes". I said " I am Brad". She said "you are late" I said "only a few seconds" she said "I don't wait".
Anyway we got a meal somewhere and I got to know her a little better. (irritating cunt). I axed her how the dating game was going for her. She replied, it was ok. If the guy was a loser, she still got a free meal out of it. She then mentioned she wanted to move down town because there was more action. I asked, where was she now? she replied, she had a 4 bedroom house in the burbs.She was going to rent it out. I asked how long she had been in Canada, cause that seemed like pretty fancy foot work to be a property owner.She said, a couple of years. I said. so how did you manage to own a house so quick? she said, she was married. now divorced. She said, " It was a bad marriage, but a good divorce"
End of story.

I use to work at a place where a popular woman worked. She was attractive, the type you would want to fuck but not marry. My buddy tried for her affections. He took her to a nice restaurant and she was impressed. She ordered expensive items and told him that it was the best food she ever had. Then in the middle of the dinner she tells the waitress to order some more food from the kitchen but to put it in a take out container. When they finished the meal the check came and she said nothing and he paid it. In the car she tells him that she has to get the food home and put it in the refrigerator before it spoils. When they got to her apartment building she gives him a peck on the cheek and thanks him and that was it for the night.

Wild Wiglin Willie said:

I use to work at a place where a popular woman worked. She was attractive, the type you would want to fuck but not marry. My buddy tried for her affections. He took her to a nice restaurant and she was impressed. She ordered expensive items and told him that it was the best food she ever had. Then in the middle of the dinner she tells the waitress to order some more food from the kitchen but to put it in a take out container. When they finished the meal the check came and she said nothing and he paid it. In the car she tells him that she has to get the food home and put it in the refrigerator before it spoils. When they got to her apartment building she gives him a peck on the cheek and thanks him and that was it for the night.

Click to expand...

buying affection from a woman does not work

Smallcock said:

Are you referring to me or the married men getting no action? I'm not married so quite happy using the hobby for fun rather than therapy or rejection at home. How about you?

Click to expand...

https://mitnicklawfirm.com/sexless-marriage-something-can-proven-used-divorce/

Sexless marriage can be grounds for divorce

A sexless marriage can be grounds for an at fault divorce under the charge of “constructive abandonment.” Despite the name, abandonment doesn’t have to be a physical departure from the marital home.

The law recognizes marriage as a partnership that comes with certain obligations. When marrying, spouses are committing to support each other financially and emotionally, participate in child-rearing and show each other love and affection. A willful failure to fulfill those obligations can be considered constructive abandonment; the spouse is considered to have emotionally withdrawn from the marriage.
Repeated rejection

Sexless marriage is both physically and emotionally taxing. Though the actual denial of sexual release is often physically frustrating, the refused intimacy can be equally damaging to the marriage. The pain of repeated rejections can have serious effects on the confidence and self-esteem of the rejected spouse.

Using sex as a weapon and withholding sex out of spite is a deeply unhealthy way of dealing with marital problems and contributes to the case for an at fault divorce.
Sexless marriage is difficult to prove

Given the private nature of most couples’ romantic life, it can be difficult to prove that a sexless marriage constitutes constructive abandonment. You must prove that the denial of sex or intimacy was willful on the part of your spouse. Dry spells are normal in any marriage, and outside influences like medication, stress, and lack of sleep can all impact sexual desire.

If a lack of sex and intimacy is causing problems in your marriage, talk to your spouse and encourage seeking advice from a sex therapist, counselor or physician. Mismatched libidos are a common marital problem that many couples are able to work through successfully. One of these methods may be able to resolve your marital problems without the need for legal services.

Your spouse must be aware that the lack of sex is an issue for you and still choose to withhold sex for it to be considered willful.

The court has a significant amount of leeway in deciding what constitutes constructive abandonment; arguing for it on the basis of lack of sex alone can be a difficult path. In a marriage where one spouse is willfully withholding sex, the problems in the relationship seldom stop at the bedroom door.
Consider filing on other grounds

Consider the other marital obligations mentioned above: financial support, emotional support, participation in child-rearing. Willful neglect of one of these obligations is often more public and may be easier to prove than that of willfully withholding sex. Evidence that your spouse has willfully withdrawn emotional support from your family or has shown indifference toward your children will bolster your argument for constructive abandonment.

A sexless marriage is a painful situation to be in. Studies say that a happy sex life is the second most important factor in a happy marriage behind fidelity. Though there is no “normal” amount of sex for any given couple, it is important that both partners are satisfied with their sexual relationship. One spouse denying intimacy to the other is incredibly damaging to a marriage.

If you have found yourself in a relationship like this, try to resolve the issue through therapy or counseling first. Should you end up deciding that divorce is the best option for you, showing that you have made good faith efforts to repair the marriage will help support your case for an at-fault divorce if necessary. An experienced family lawyer will be able to counsel you on what the appropriate steps are to free yourself from this sexless marriage.

How many people do you know that have married for convenience? How many marry because of pressure from society or family?
Some marry for status, money, position. How many marry and have fallen out of love? Some marriages are sexless but it is not ended due to age, financial reasons or for the children.

Grimnul said:

This is the biggest load of bullshit I’ve ever seen you post, and you’ve posted some whoppers. Pretty much everyone would consider being dishonest and using people for food/sex to be shitty behavior. I have never met a healthy, functional person who unironically used the term “redpill”, they’re always angry, pathetic little men who don’t get what they want, so they blame women for their lack of success. You know what you were doing. You were stirring shit as usual, and spewing more of the usual misogynistic garbage, and now you’re deflecting. I’ll say it again: women are not the only ones guilty of this sort of behavior. If you’re going to lay blame, lay it on everyone who deserves it. Otherwise, it’s just biased nonsense.

Also, I’m nowhere near a baby boomer. I’m a millennial, if anything.

Click to expand...

At least he didn't post another dad thread. Seems him, Dart, and CanadaMan are competing for the most frivolous threads started

The term "incel" has fascinated me since some gender studies major with a hate on for cock, started circulating it to her friends on social media. It, of course, means "involuntarily celibate". They attribute this to any male who they think must be angry and out of sorts because they are not having sex...or can't gain access to it. How would they know this as fact? How would they know these men aren't having sex? Because they are not having sex with THEM...…....Even in the very bowels of societal debasing and human insults, to these particular females(not all), it is still about them.Fascinating

This is called the game of life, just part of the game what has been mentioned in these previous threads However many woman are proud and independent and fend and feed themselves and others.

Grimnul said:

And a huge percentage of guys have dated a girl just for sex. I know I did in my younger and stupider years. There are two sides to everything. I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again: it’s not a women are shitty thing, it’s a people are shitty thing.

Click to expand...

Oh my!! A fellow reasonable person!! I hear it all the time from both sides...it’s either men are shitty or women are shitty. No, people are shitty. Duh!!! But people do love to blow smoke up their own asses and vilifying other genders is just another way to do that.

Big ol’ gender circle jerks...fuelling the feeling of superiority since the divergence of Homo sapiens:biggrin-new:

I think thats fine personally. Dating is a game right? We all have different motives so it doesnt surprise me if a lady is dating to get free meals. Guy offers free meal to lady to get her to come out. In that 2-3 hrs. He has her attention to see if he can break down her barriers and make something of it.

Parker@TDL said:

Oh my!! A fellow reasonable person!! I hear it all the time from both sides...it’s either men are shitty or women are shitty. No, people are shitty. Duh!!! But people do love to blow smoke up their own asses and vilifying other genders is just another way to do that.

Big ol’ gender circle jerks...fuelling the feeling of superiority since the divergence of Homo sapiens:biggrin-new:

Click to expand...

This

As long as this is communicated, what's the problem? There should be some give and take, though, not just take. If the man is paying for the dinner, the woman needs to offer something. Yes, this can sometimes mean sex, but it usually just means a good faith effort to establish a longer-term relationship. If she's just doing it for the free meal, with no intention of reciprocating in some way, that's deplorable. There's an implicit agreement in going on a date that both parties will act in good faith.

This is by no means a one-way street, either. Men should not imply they are looking for long-term relationships when they're only after a booty call.

In the past I have had dinner with ladies with no expectations of sex, a few of these ladies attempted to do due diligence like a financial loan officer which took away from the dining experience. Previously when I was more in the marketplace, I found it more convenient to fu.ck woman and then wine and dine them.

Wild Wiglin Willie said:

I use to work at a place where a popular woman worked. She was attractive, the type you would want to fuck but not marry. My buddy tried for her affections. He took her to a nice restaurant and she was impressed. She ordered expensive items and told him that it was the best food she ever had. Then in the middle of the dinner she tells the waitress to order some more food from the kitchen but to put it in a take out container. When they finished the meal the check came and she said nothing and he paid it. In the car she tells him that she has to get the food home and put it in the refrigerator before it spoils. When they got to her apartment building she gives him a peck on the cheek and thanks him and that was it for the night.

Click to expand...

I had this happen to me before. I excused myself after one young lady ordered food to go at the table, and I left the restaurant and left her with the entire bill. She called me a few times and left angry messages. I texted her and apologized; said it was an emergency, but I was appalled by her messages and told her never to call me again. I think there was a chance we would have had sex at the end of that date too, but I decided out of principle I wasn't going to wait and find out. I spent my dinner funds at Café Atlantis that night. I told the story to a well known dancer and showed her the texts going back and forth. We laughed, we fu@'d and had a great evening.

Scarey said:

The term "incel" has fascinated me since some gender studies major with a hate on for cock, started circulating it to her friends on social media. It, of course, means "involuntarily celibate". They attribute this to any male who they think must be angry and out of sorts because they are not having sex...or can't gain access to it. How would they know this as fact? How would they know these men aren't having sex? Because they are not having sex with THEM...…....Even in the very bowels of societal debasing and human insults, to these particular females(not all), it is still about them.Fascinating

Click to expand...

ya incels are secretly having sex with supermodels

Scarey said:

Even in the very bowels of societal debasing and human insults, to these particular females(not all), it is still about them.Fascinating

Click to expand...

well said.

My good friend Cazzelino never went to Valhalla in its heyday, his pov may be different today.

Some men never get over the stupid of rejection, that protective thick skin never develops and they become incels. If I had $20 for every rejection I had to work through, I'd be a millionaire. Responsible single mothers put the needs of their children before themselves, they tend to be famished and grateful if the bloke springs for a doggy bag. When you buy dinner, your chances of getting a Dinah Mo Hum are actually 50/50, if you play it cool. Be hard up and she'll look for a better offer quickly.