Toronto Escorts

The end of political cartoons at The New York Times

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
6,793
2,787
113
The end of political cartoons at The New York Times

All my professional life, I have been driven by the conviction that the unique freedom of political cartooning entails a great sense of responsibility.

In 20-plus years of delivering a twice-weekly cartoon for the International Herald Tribune first, and then The New York Times, after receiving three OPC awards in that category, I thought the case for political cartoons had been made (in a newspaper that was notoriously reluctant to the form in past history.) But something happened. In April 2019, a Netanyahu caricature from syndication reprinted in the international editions triggered widespread outrage, a Times apology and the termination of syndicated cartoons. Weeks later, my employers tell me they're ending political cartoons altogether by July. I’m putting down my pen, with a sigh: that’s a lot of years of work undone by a single cartoon - not even mine - that should never have run in the best newspaper of the world.

I’m afraid this is not just about cartoons, but about journalism and opinion in general. We are in a world where moralistic mobs gather on social media and rise like a storm, falling upon newsrooms in an overwhelming blow. This requires immediate counter-measures by publishers, leaving no room for ponderation or meaningful discussions. Twitter is a place for furor, not debate. The most outraged voices tend to define the conversation, and the angry crowd follows in.

Over the last years, with the Cartooning for Peace Foundation we established with French cartoonist Plantu and the late Kofi Annan - a great defender of cartoons - or on the board of the Association of American Editorial Cartoonists, I have consistently warned about the dangers of those sudden (and often organized) backlashes that carry everything in their path. If cartoons are a prime target it’s because of their nature and exposure: they are an encapsulated opinion, a visual shortcut with an unmatched capacity to touch the mind. That’s their strength, and their vulnerability. They might also be a revealor of something deeper. More than often, the real target, behind the cartoon, is the media that published it.

“Political cartoons were born with democracy.
And they are challenged when freedom is.“

In 1995, at twenty-something, I moved to New York with a crazy dream: I would convince the New York Times to have political cartoons. An art director told me: “We never had political cartoons and we will never have any.“ But I was stubborn. For years, I did illustrations for NYT Opinion and the Book Review, then I persuaded the Paris-based International Herald Tribune (a NYT-Washington Post joint venture) to hire an in-house editorial cartoonist. By 2013, when the NYT had fully incorporated the IHT, there I was: featured on the NYT website, on its social media and in its international print editions. In 2018, we started translating cartoons on the NYT Chinese and Spanish websites. The U.S. paper edition remained the last frontier. Gone out the door, I had come back through the window. And proven that art director wrong: The New York Times did have political cartoons. For a while in history, they dared.

Along with The Economist, featuring the excellent Kal, The New York Times was one of the last venues for international political cartooning - for a U.S. newspaper aiming to have a meaningful impact worldwide, it made sense. Cartoons can jump over borders. Who will show the emperor Erdogan that he has no clothes, when Turkish cartoonists can’t do it ? – one of them, our friend Musa Kart, is now in jail. Cartoonists from Venezuela, Nicaragua and Russia were forced into exile. Over the last years, some of the very best cartoonists in the U.S., like Nick Anderson and Rob Rogers, lost their positions because their publishers found their work too critical of Trump. Maybe we should start worrying. And pushing back. Political cartoons were born with democracy. And they are challenged when freedom is.

“The power of images
has never been so big.“

Curiously, I remain positive. This is the era of images. In a world of short attention span, their power has never been so big. Out there is a whole world of possibilities, not only in editorial cartooning, still or animated, but also in new fields like on-stage illustrated presentations and long-form comics reportage - of which I have been a proponent for the last 25 years. (I’m happy, by the way, to have opened the door for the genre at the NYT with the “Inside Death Row“ series in 2016. The following year, another series about Syrian refugees by Jake Halpern and Michael Sloan got the NYT a Pulitzer prize.) It’s also a time where the media need to renew themselves and reach out to new audiences. And stop being afraid of the angry mob. In the insane world we live in, the art of the visual commentary is needed more than ever. And so is humor.
https://twitter.com/patchappatte/status/1138145415604449280?s=21
 

Darts

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2017
23,061
11,160
113
I know that cartoons are meant to masquerade as satire but some of them are vicious personal attacks. Good riddance.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
The NYT is a political cartoon.
 

Mr Deeds

Muff Diver Extraordinaire
Mar 10, 2013
5,981
3,017
113
Here
I know that cartoons are meant to masquerade as satire but some of them are vicious personal attacks. Good riddance.
0
You could say the same thing about op- eds , letters to the editor, and columnists, should we stop those too?
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,495
11
38
'Offensive' cartoon appears (in the International edition) almost six weeks back.

<Much Hoorah>

Times apologizes immediately.

<Hoorah continues>

Times announces no more cartoons (in the International edition).

<Hoorah still continues>

Some people can't take, 'Sorry, you were hurt. We were wrong and won't do it again', for an answer.

Maybe when they grow up …
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,703
21
38
It has something to do with this:

 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,703
21
38

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,707
3,405
113
The original purpose was to be able to disseminate a political message in simple terms to near illiterate people.

Now pretty much everyone is literate who reads newspapers so really they have been regulated to inside jokes among political junkies.

What's interesting though is an argument can be made the "meme" has replaced them. So is this because Photoshop is more universal, or that we are becoming less literate for detailed analysis?
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,558
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
Now that’s funny
What the NYT is really telling the world is that they cannot be trusted not to run anti-Semitic humor. Says a lot, doesn't it? Scratch a lefty, reveal a Jew hater!
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,707
3,405
113
So you think they've been replaced by Trump's tweets?
Didn't you read where I said they have been replaced by memes.

That's a tiny Trump world you live in.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,707
3,405
113
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts