Like never forget Stalin and Pol Pot? Aren't those Commie friends of yours? Or do they not count?'Never Forget'.
Too bad you didn't learn that lesson.
Like never forget Stalin and Pol Pot? Aren't those Commie friends of yours? Or do they not count?'Never Forget'.
Too bad you didn't learn that lesson.
I guess you don't know enough history to get 'never forget'.Like never forget Stalin and Pol Pot? Aren't those Commie friends of yours? Or do they not count?
So JCPro is a Holocaust denier.And spreading untruths and half truths, even about the greatest historical murderers, serves exactly whom and to what end?
I never agreed to anything, please post what you think is this agreement.Obviously you cannot be trusted by anyone, as when there is an agreement not to respond to posts, all you do is break that agreement.
You need help as you are either sick, or ignorant to what you agreed to!!
Really?! That's what you got from this thread? My quest for historical truth makes me a Holocaust denier? Moi? My mother's, pretty much, whole family was murdered by the German einsatzgruppen in the Western Ukraine. Give your head a vigorous shake. I could call you a few names, but that would be a waste of adjectives since you wouldn't understand, anyway. Stay away from an adult conversation. You ain't got the grey matter to handle it.So JCPro is a Holocaust denier.
Another shocking revelation!
So keep defending the honour of the Third Reich.Arguing for historical accuracy doesn't mean you're promoting or defending any individual or event. To call the Nazi government incompetent is an easily verifiable lie. It's propaganda pushed by weak people who can't accept truth when that truth is morally undesirable. It may make you feel good, or high and mighty for a brief moment, but deep inside, you know that it's a lie and you can never get closure by lying to yourself. You'll always feel that unease in the back of your mind. I think deniers are motivated by genuine intentions (i.e. smash all that the Nazis represented into the dust and call them failures at everything they did so that they can never be seen as a source of inspiration) but roads to Hell have often been paved with good intentions.
Really?! That's what you got from this thread? My quest for historical truth makes me a Holocaust denier? Moi? My mother's, pretty much, whole family was murdered by the German einsatzgruppen in the Western Ukraine. Give your head a vigorous shake. I could call you a few names, but that would be a waste of adjectives since you wouldn't understand, anyway. Stay away from an adult conversation. You ain't got the grey matter to handle it.
It looks like halfwit, quacks like a halfwit....If it looks like a Holocaust denier...and it talks like a Holocaust denier...
There's lots more as the piece goes on: About being lazy and not doing the work, being obsessed with approval, thinking of himself first and foremost as a performer with a gift for empty catchphrases, and there is no denying the clear personality parallels between yesterday's autocrat and today's. But I got tired of even the simple edits I did to take out the proper names. It's quite amazing that so many here seem to think the original piece was about WWII.…
Why did the elites so consistently underestimate him? Possibly because they weren’t actually wrong in their assessment of his competency—they just failed to realise that this wasn’t enough to stand in the way of his ambition. As it would turn out, he was really bad at running a government. As his own press chief later wrote in his memoir, "In the few years of his rule he produced the biggest confusion in government that has ever existed in a civilized state."
His government was constantly in chaos, with officials having no idea what he wanted them to do, and nobody was entirely clear who was actually in charge of what. He procrastinated wildly when asked to make difficult decisions, and would often end up relying on gut feeling, leaving even close allies in the dark about his plans. His "unreliability had those who worked with him pulling out their hair," as a confidant later wrote in his memoir. This meant that rather than carrying out the duties of state, they spent most of their time in-fighting and back-stabbing each other in an attempt to either win his approval or avoid his attention altogether, depending on what mood he was in that day.
There’s a bit of an argument among historians about whether this was a deliberate ploy on his part to get his own way, or whether he was just really, really bad at being in charge of stuff. His Press Secretary came down on the side of it being a cunning tactic to sow division and chaos—and it’s undeniable that he was very effective at that. But when you look at his personal habits, it’s hard to shake the feeling that it was just a natural result of putting a workshy narcissist in charge of a country.
…
Again, yes nasty words are bad and they should be sent to the corner until they stop....
Only Franky could downplay virulent and violent anti-semitism while claiming to be opposed to racism (and claiming it is racist to criticize Hamas).I guess you don't know enough history to get 'never forget'.
As they say about those who don't know history.....
Yet when someone questions accuracy of statements about the Nazis after having said they think Jews control the world, it sure seems that that the quest for "accuracy" is about something other than accuracy.Arguing for historical accuracy doesn't mean you're promoting or defending any individual or event...
INDEED! Not to mention the fact that smallcock et al got themselves quite worked up over these “inaccuracies” about Hitler. It seems they took it very personally.Yet when someone questions accuracy of statements about the Nazis after having said they think Jews control the world, it sure seems that that the quest for "accuracy" is about something other than accuracy.
I don't care what it seems like to you. Argue the facts based on their merits. The Nazis were many things but incompetent and lazy they weren't. They were a strict, highly efficient, highly competent, and thoroughly dedicated regime.Yet when someone questions accuracy of statements about the Nazis after having said they think Jews control the world, it sure seems that that the quest for "accuracy" is about something other than accuracy.
LOL...What in the name of God are you ranting about now? If you wanna eat a dog then go for it...Don’t let me stand in your way.You extreme lefties are going to have a hard time with this one: The Nazis are responsible for what we call the Animal Rights movement today. When you get your panties in a bunch over Chinese eating dogs, remember that it was the Nazis who were the first to condemn brutality toward animals. Let all your vegan buddies know ASAP!
The Nazis are responsible for what we call the Animal Rights movement today.
Always ready to jump and defend Nazis from slander!The Nazis were many things but incompetent and lazy they weren't. They were a strict, highly efficient, highly competent, and thoroughly dedicated regime.
And Hitler Youth kids helped little old ladies across the street. You are actually saying we shouldn't be kind to animals and little old ladies because long-ago Nazis were? Clearly it's your cortex that's really small, not just your cock.You extreme lefties are going to have a hard time with this one: The Nazis are responsible for what we call the Animal Rights movement today. When you get your panties in a bunch over Chinese eating dogs, remember that it was the Nazis who were the first to condemn brutality toward animals. Let all your vegan buddies know ASAP!