He did.Then Mueller would have to be in on it as all he has to do is speak up right?
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/30/us/politics/mueller-barr.htmlMueller Objected to Barr’s Description of Russia Investigation’s Findings on Trump
He did.Then Mueller would have to be in on it as all he has to do is speak up right?
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/30/us/politics/mueller-barr.htmlMueller Objected to Barr’s Description of Russia Investigation’s Findings on Trump
Actually that's one House Rep. She already has the House.LOL. So far there is one and and I have some doubt there are 2 but i have no idea what that has to do with the point you are trying and failing to walk back.
I think that with the ongoing investigations there will come a time when even the republicans won't be able to support him.Trump, despite what you want, won't be impeached and removed from office before the 2020 election.
This isn't the time of Nixon. They had Clinton dead to Rights on Perjury. And he was left in Office.I think that with the ongoing investigations there will come a time when even the republicans won't be able to support him.
He is so corrupt, stupid, racist and dishonest that he'll alienate everyone soon enough.
True, Trump is less popular than Nixon and so much more corrupt as well.This isn't the time of Nixon. .
Clinton, Clinton, Clinton..... Well you love dragging the Clintons into a thread that has nothing to do with them. But you are critical of me, when I mention Trump in a thread that is relevant to the discussion!!This isn't the time of Nixon. They had Clinton dead to Rights on Perjury. And he was left in Office.
I'm doubtful they will impeach based on things prior to his taking office. Just because it sets a precedent they don't want.
Come on and agree with Sanders for once, okay??Bernie Sanders: "It May Well Be Time" To Begin Trump Impeachment Proceedings:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...e_to_begin_trump_impeachment_proceedings.html
As we are discussing impeachment I'd say comparing the circumstances is indeed relevant. The press sure does it.Clinton, Clinton, Clinton..... Well you love dragging the Clintons into a thread that has nothing to do with them. But you are critical of me, when I mention Trump in a thread that is relevant to the discussion!!
Anyway, do you for once fully agree with the person that you endorse for President in 2020??
Come on and agree with Sanders for once, okay??
Bernie says it may be time to impeach Trump.As we are discussing impeachment I'd say comparing the circumstances is indeed relevant. The press sure does it.
Lol. Such binary thinking. Bernie in this case can say what he likes because in the end it doesn't hurt him.Bernie says it may be time to impeach Trump.
Do you support Bernie or Trump?
53 cowardly Republicans.Lol. Such binary thinking. Bernie in this case can say what he likes because in the end it doesn't hurt him.
Any fallout from proceeding and failing is all on Pelosi and Schumer.
You do realize Trump wants this right? It's a great thing for him to campaign on. So really anyone who supports impeachment is in a backhanded way supporting Trump.
Because it will fail.
So you support Trump, not Bernie.Lol. Such binary thinking. Bernie in this case can say what he likes because in the end it doesn't hurt him.
Any fallout from proceeding and failing is all on Pelosi and Schumer.
You do realize Trump wants this right? It's a great thing for him to campaign on. So really anyone who supports impeachment is in a backhanded way supporting Trump.
Because it will fail.
I support due process. In other words if enough real evidence of wrong doing comes to light of bad acts committed by Trump to get the required votes in the Senate after a fair trial there then I'm good with it.So you support Trump, not Bernie.
Just checking in case it had finally changed, but nope, you're still just a Trumptard talking out the side of your mouth.
Then read the fucking report.I support due process. In other words if enough real evidence of wrong doing comes to light of bad acts committed by Trump to get the required votes in the Senate after a fair trial there then I'm good with it.
.
Then why don't the Dems do it?Then read the fucking report.
https://mailchi.mp/dp.la/mueller-report-now-available-ebks
There is enough evidence there to impeach based on obstruction alone, according over 800 federal prosecutors.
Answer. Pelosi.Then why don't the Dems do it?
Answer. Because perhaps there isn't enough to garner 67 votes in the Senate. And that's all that counts.
Okay, so when we talk about corruption, obstruction of justice etc. and the thread is relevant to Trump, why on earth does it ruffle your feathers??As we are discussing impeachment I'd say comparing the circumstances is indeed relevant. The press sure does it.
In other words a coverup of your idol Trump to you in fine. Should Justice not be served?Then why don't the Dems do it?
Answer. Because perhaps there isn't enough to garner 67 votes in the Senate. And that's all that counts.
Ruffle my feathers? Um no. I look at at all the circumstances and give an opinion on the likely outcome.Okay, so when we talk about corruption, obstruction of justice etc. and the thread is relevant to Trump, why on earth does it ruffle your feathers??
No what I'm saying is I don't believe their is enough evidence to Warrent impeachment. And GOP as well have to pay attention to their voters just as the Dems calling for it are doing so because their base is screaming for it.In other words a coverup of your idol Trump to you in fine. Should Justice not be served?
To me once the House of Representatives gets to the bottom of all the crimes related to this President and it is fully revealed to the Americans, then it will be the right time to impeach him. The Senate Republicans will be on the hook for a full coverup if they do not side with the Impeachment. We all know and you do as well, that Trump will do his very best not to release any of his tax returns, Deutsche Bank records, and other documents relating to his criminal activities. Why are the various individuals from the AG to trump's staff not showing up and ignoring the subpoenas when by law they should do so??
Yep. And what does it say about the state of the party when the rest of the senior members back this and her?Answer. Pelosi.