What's your review style preference?

I employ the golden rule...what would I want to know? I like the backstory...but that can add length....so i now isolate sections so any reader can quickly navigate the review and go straight to the details, or contact info, or a general description of the date.

Sometimes i have a bit of fun...once did a review (duo of now retired Sinthia and Michelle Monet) to the "night before Christmas".

I do let the lady or agency see the review first though, and give them the chance to dispute something in private first, because if you put something out on the board it is hard to withdraw it. E.g., one lady asked I not link to her former working name as she was outed under that name. I honoured that. Once a lady asked that I gush more about her bj. It was just an OK bj, so I did not honour that request. Of course I give myself final edit rights to endure the review will be useful to the yobs. But I want to be fair to her too.

Can't stand "Harlequin Romance" reviews, to be honest. I highly doubt anybody based out of Ottawa could blow me away that much that I would write a "Harlequin Romance" about it. It would have to be the perfect encounter and that's very difficult to achieve unless you do a lot of mythologizing.

I ought to do a review of somebody and tell you how it really went.

Please leave out the details. For a variety of reasons that have been discussed more than enough, detailed reviews are bad for everyone in this business. All I need to know is whether or not the lady is real and does she provide a good experience.