Toronto Escorts

Former Liberal minister Philpott says Canadians need to know ‘whole story’ of SNC

Huber

Banned
Mar 9, 2019
28
1
0
Former Liberal minister Philpott says Canadians need to know ‘whole story’ of SNC-Lavalin affair

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has brushed aside calls from former cabinet minister Jane Philpott to waive all cabinet and solicitor general privileges to allow Jody Wilson-Raybould to speak freely about the fallout from the SNC-Lavalin affair.

Ms. Philpott told Maclean’s magazine in an interview published on Thursday that Canadians need to know “the whole story” of what she called an “attempt to politically interfere with the justice system in its work on the criminal trial” of Montreal-based SNC-Lavalin.

Ms. Philpott resigned earlier this month as President of the Treasury Board, citing a lack of confidence in the way the Prime Minister handled the SNC-Lavalin matter.

The political controversy has resulted in the resignations of four high-profile members of the Trudeau government and maneuvers by the opposition to disrupt Parliament in protest of a decision by the Liberal-dominated justice committee to shut down its inquiry into the matter.

Conservative MPs forced marathon votes on spending estimates Wednesday night that are expected to take up most of Thursday and force the cancellation of the Commons Question Period.

In testimony before the Commons justice committee last month, Ms. Wilson-Raybould said she faced “consistent and sustained” pressure from Mr. Trudeau and top aides including the Clerk of the Privy Council, Michael Wernick, to grant a deferred prosecution agreement to the Montreal engineering and construction company.

The B.C. Liberal MP has said she wanted to return for a second round of testimony to explain what transpired between when she was moved out of the justice portfolio in early January and her resignation from cabinet on Feb. 11.

She has asked Prime Minister to give her another waiver from solicitor-client privilege and cabinet confidentiality to talk about conversations with Mr. Trudeau that led to her resignation from cabinet.

“If nothing wrong took place, then why don’t we waive privilege on the whole issue and let those who have something to say on it speak their minds and share their stories,” Ms. Philpott said. “My sense is that Canadians would like to know the whole truth.”

At an event in Mississauga, Mr. Trudeau told reporters he already granted an unprecedented waiver to Ms. Wilson-Raybould so she could provide testimony about the political pressure she said was exerted between September and December 2018 to help SNC-Lavalin out of its legal difficulties.

“The issue was pressure around SNC-Lavalin while she was attorney-general and she got to speak fully to do that,” Mr. Trudeau said in dismissing requests he allow her to speak about the period after she was shuffled out of Justice.

This week, the government has tried to shift the political focus from the SNC-Lavalin affair to the budget. The issue has dominated Parliament since The Globe and Mail reported on Feb. 7 that the Prime Minister’s Office pressured the former attorney general to negotiate an out-of-court settlement with SNC-Lavalin.

In the fallout from The Globe report, Mr. Trudeau has lost the two ministers as well as his principal secretary, Gerald Butts. On Monday, Mr. Wernick retired as Canada’s top bureaucratic saying he has lost the “trust and respect" of the opposition parties over his role in the SNC-Lavalin matter.

On Tuesday, Liberal MPs on the Justice committee shut down hearings on the SNC-Lavalin matter, preventing Ms. Wilson-Raybould from returning to testify.

Liberal MPs are also expected to use their majority on the House ethics committees on Thursday to block an attempt by Conservative and NDP members to mount an inquiry and have Ms. Wilson-Raybould testify.

In the Maclean’s interview, Ms. Philpott said she is also keen to have cabinet privileges waived so she could talk about a Dec. 6 meeting with the Prime Minister when they discussed his plans to shuffle Ms. Wilson-Raybould out of the post of justice minister and attorney-general.

“I spoke to the Prime Minister on January the 6th about SNC-Lavalin’s desire to have a DPA [deferred prosecution agreement],” she said. “I think Canadians might want to know why I would have raised that with the Prime Minister. … Why would I have felt that there was a reason why the former minister Wilson-Raybould should not be shuffled.”

Mr. Trudeau had a different interpretation of that meeting, saying it was about Ms. Philpott’s move from Indigenous Services to Treasury Board President and his plan to have Ms. Wilson-Raybould take over her portfolio.

“She asked me directly if this was in link to the SNC-Lavalin decision and I told her, ‘no it was not,’ ” he said. “She then mentioned it may be a challenge for Jody-Wilson Raybould to take on the role of Indigenous Services.”

Mr. Trudeau said he asked Ms. Philpott “for her help, and she gladly offered" to help convince Ms. Wilson-Raybould to take the position. A former B.C. regional chief of the Assembly of First Nations, Ms. Wilson-Raybould turned down the job because she did not want to oversee the Indian Act.

Ms. Wilson-Raybould was then shuffled to Veteran Affairs on Jan. 14, which she believed was related to her refusal to help SNC-Lavalin out of its legal difficulties.

Ms. Philpott said Ms. Wilson-Raybould was subjected to “bullying or harassment” from the Prime Minister’s Office to overrule federal prosecutors and negotiate an out-of-court settlement with SNC-Lavalin.

“The former AG didn’t want to override that, and she had her finger in the dike and said no repeatedly," Ms. Philpott said.

In the aftermath of Ms. Philpott’s interview, NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh renewed calls on Thursday for a judicial inquiry.

"Give us the independence of a judge that is not limited by a Liberal-dominated committee, where a judge has the independence to ask all witnesses all the questions necessary so Canadians can learn the truth,” he said. “If the Prime Minister was co-operative, the public inquiry would not take very long. It could happen right away and Canadians could know the truth before the election.”

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-former-liberal-minister-philpott-says-canadians-need-to-know-whole/
 

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,539
2,409
113
The PMO is the only one who doesn't want Canadians to hear “the whole story”. It's blatantly obvious!
 

Conil

Well-known member
Apr 12, 2013
3,429
555
113
Huber That gif of yours is memorizing

VIDEO: Once Again, Trudeau Speaks About Something He’s Muzzling Female MPs From Talking About

What an amazing ‘feminist’!
Jane Philpott and Jody Wilson-Raybould are both being muzzled by Trudeau and his PMO cronies.

Jody Wilson-Raybould made that clear when she said there was more she wanted to say, but couldn’t because Trudeau hasn’t fully lifted privilege.

And Jane Philpott made it clear when she said that “there’s much more to the story that needs to be told,” and called on Trudeau to fully waive privilege – something he refuses to do.

So, there are two principled female MPs who are being muzzled by Trudeau.
And yet, he keeps speaking freely about the matters in which he’s muzzled them.

This is something Trudeau has done throughout the entire scandal, and it’s a total disgrace: He gets his (totally dishonest) side of the story out, while muzzling female MPs from speaking the truth.
No wonder his fake feminist branding has totally collapsed.

What a disgusting hypocrite.

https://www.spencerfernando.com/201...g-hes-muzzling-female-mps-from-talking-about/
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,806
3,460
113
As the PM continues down this road every day is a new political meme and commercial in September.

Obviously he is now incapable of allowing the truth to be heard so it will be up to the voters to change who is in charge.

Then the truth can be heard.
 

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,539
2,409
113
As the PM continues down this road every day is a new political meme and commercial in September.

Obviously he is now incapable of allowing the truth to be heard so it will be up to the voters to change who is in charge.

Then the truth can be heard.
Trudeau's actually very capable of preventing the truth to be heard. That's exactly what he's done. Why else wouldn't he allow Philpott and JWR say what they have to say? Because he's knows what they'll say and it won't be pretty.

He just sounds so smarmy when he says he's allowed both to speak freely. While everyone knows the waiver does not cover the period after JWR was shuffled to Veterans Affairs and her subsequent resignation from cabinet.
 

Zaibetter

Banned
Mar 27, 2016
4,284
1
0
Letting her speak will much more devastating for the Groper that the status quo which is bad enough as it is...this is why he won't let her speak.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,473
17,805
113
As the PM continues down this road every day is a new political meme and commercial in September.

Obviously he is now incapable of allowing the truth to be heard so it will be up to the voters to change who is in charge.

Then the truth can be heard.
Lock her up!

This is sounding so much like the pointless attacks on Clinton.
Just so much more partisan noise over nothing.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,806
3,460
113
Lock her up!

This is sounding so much like the pointless attacks on Clinton.
Just so much more partisan noise over nothing.
I didn't say that. I said wait for the election and legitimately vote how you feel about this.

And we now have 2 cabinet ministers resigning and a third MP leave caucus. Lots of smoke.

Philpot was considered one of the stars of the party. I believe her. And the other two.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,452
5,641
113
I didn't say that. I said wait for the election and legitimately vote how you feel about this.

And we now have 2 cabinet ministers resigning and a third MP leave caucus. Lots of smoke.

Philpot was considered one of the stars of the party. I believe her. And the other two.
The President of SNC-Lavalin has confirmed that he did not have any communication with the Liberals. So why would there have been any pressure based on "corruption" that the Conservatives and NDP seem to portray??
Yes, the PM has every right to try and protect a big company like SNC-Lavalin from shedding jobs in Canada. Companies like SNC-Lavalin do get away with such acts of corruption and bribery and the DPA enables them to get off with a hefty fine. That is why Canada is the laughing stock of the world when 20 - 40 such cases occur in the USA on an annual basis. Those companies trade in Canada with no issues whatsoever. This is total BS that is blown out of proportion, and the Justice Committee is right to just curtail this back and forth he said / she said!!
 

dickydoem

Area 51 Escapee
Apr 15, 2003
1,179
64
48
Stuck in Lodi again
Letting her speak will much more devastating for the Groper that the status quo which is bad enough as it is...this is why he won't let her speak.
I've heard hints that what they could both reveal is what was responsible for the sudden departures of Butts and Wernick and is so damaging to Trudeau that he would be forced out by his own party if they wanted to avoid be decimated in the coming election.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,473
17,805
113
I didn't say that. I said wait for the election and legitimately vote how you feel about this.

And we now have 2 cabinet ministers resigning and a third MP leave caucus. Lots of smoke.

Philpot was considered one of the stars of the party. I believe her. And the other two.
You still keep calling for Clinton to be investigated.
Just tell me what the crime was here.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,806
3,460
113
You still keep calling for Clinton to be investigated.
Just tell me what the crime was here.
Who said it has to be criminal? This is about interference in a criminal matter for political reasons. About using the power of his office to garner votes.

That is something Canadians should know about to decide this October if they want a PM who will cowtow to Multinational corporations and subvert justice for political gain.

And also silence whistleblowers.

I'd say from the reactions I've seen most Canadians are against this type of behavior in our leaders.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,473
17,805
113
Who said it has to be criminal? This is about interference in a criminal matter for political reasons. About using the power of his office to garner votes.

That is something Canadians should know about to decide this October if they want a PM who will cowtow to Multinational corporations and subvert justice for political gain.

And also silence whistleblowers.

I'd say from the reactions I've seen most Canadians are against this type of behavior in our leaders.
Why?
The system worked as its supposed to.
The put in place a new system, DPA's, they talked about whether it should apply and the implications if it didn't
And the AG made her decision and the government stuck to it.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,806
3,460
113
Why?
The system worked as its supposed to.
The put in place a new system, DPA's, they talked about whether it should apply and the implications if it didn't
And the AG made her decision and the government stuck to it.
They snuck "this new system" in an omnibus bill after promising not to do so. And now it appears may have done so specifically for SNC Lavalin.

The question that is now out there is how much did Trudeau get to change the laws? Because when the AG didn't cooperate I guess SNC Lavalin tried to make sure Trudeau lived up to his end. And Trudeau couldn't even get that right.

Success of failure has nothing to do with intent.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,473
17,805
113
They snuck "this new system" in an omnibus bill after promising not to do so. And now it appears may have done so specifically for SNC Lavalin.
.
Now you're complaining about politics being done by politicians?
All to defend a Canadian company (albeit not a clean company)?
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,806
3,460
113
Now you're complaining about politics being done by politicians?
All to defend a Canadian company (albeit not a clean company)?
It isn't "politics" to change laws to shield donors from criminal charges.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,473
17,805
113
It isn't "politics" to change laws to shield donors from criminal charges.
Sure it is.
Politicians write the laws, you think this is the first time its happened?
And they wouldn't be 'shielded', they would have still be guilty and just paid a fine instead of being barred from contracts with the govt.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,806
3,460
113
Sure it is.
Politicians write the laws, you think this is the first time its happened?
And they wouldn't be 'shielded', they would have still be guilty and just paid a fine instead of being barred from contracts with the govt.
Wow. Condoning corruption. Just wow.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,447
1,331
113
They snuck "this new system" in an omnibus bill after promising not to do so. And now it appears may have done so specifically for SNC Lavalin.

The question that is now out there is how much did Trudeau get to change the laws? Because when the AG didn't cooperate I guess SNC Lavalin tried to make sure Trudeau lived up to his end. And Trudeau couldn't even get that right.

Success of failure has nothing to do with intent.
Rubbish, it was reviewed by the Justice committe and UNANIMOUSLY approved by ALL PARTIES.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,806
3,460
113
Rubbish, it was reviewed by the Justice committe and UNANIMOUSLY approved by ALL PARTIES.
They promised not to use Omnibus bills so there was transparency for voters. Timing is also suspect.

I think voters are having an issue with this. Judging from their reactions.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts