Inaccurate? Not likely at +25Anyone have any tips on fighting a speeding ticket? Got one for going 85 in a 60 zone (near the CNE). If I take it to court, what possible argument could I even have (the radar was inaccurate, cop pointed at the car beside.me)?
KBear, I had checked out your link & is worth a look. We have quite a few photo cameras here in Kitchener & it seems the spray is the best to use to stop the camera from getting a clear photo of your plate.Traffic ticket discussion board
https://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/exceeding-the-speed-limit-by-16-to-29-km-h/
Looks through the site, there is a list of steps to take.
the spray does not work. It has been tested by numerous car magazines, as well as on Mythbusters. And on top of that, if the regular patrol type cop happens to stop you and sees that the plate is "obscured" in any way, that's another ticket.KBear, I had checked out your link & is worth a look. We have quite a few photo cameras here in Kitchener & it seems the spray is the best to use to stop the camera from getting a clear photo of your plate.
My GPS gives a verbal warning if I'm approaching a red light camera!
Get yourself one of those retired cop paralegals to look after it, you'll pay the fine but you'll keep your points.
Not quite true. Any speed conviction more than 15km over the limit will result in points. The court has the ability to amend the fine, but the points are assessed by the Ministry of Transportation. For example, if you got caught doing 25km/h over, the court could take pity on your financial situation and amend the fine to say $50. Once the MTO is notified of the 25 over conviction, they assess the points. The courts cannot and does not deal with points.
Best bet is to see if they will take a guilty plea to 15km over, fine is lower and no points, saves the courts having a trial.
Thanks kugel2 for the heads up on the spray.the spray does not work. It has been tested by numerous car magazines, as well as on Mythbusters. And on top of that, if the regular patrol type cop happens to stop you and sees that the plate is "obscured" in any way, that's another ticket.
This ^^^Go for early resolution. If the ticket was not ready marked down chances are good that the crown will drop it to 10 ov er. 45 dollars no points.
Dangerous failing? We don't know the conditions surrounding the OP's ticket for 25 km/h over the limit. If he was weaving in out of traffic on a busy, rainy afternoon, then yes I would consider that dangerous. But if it was a clear sunny day with no traffic, then it's a completely different situation. He still deserves to get a ticket but the speed alone doesn't tell the whole story.Focus on reduced penalty, it's unlikely you can dispute the evidence. For that you'll have to admit guilt, and you should start by admitting your dangerous failing to yourself, and doing the same here. If you didn't see the cop in time to slow down, you wouldn't see a kid chasing their dog, or the asshole in front of you braking for the kid or the cop.
Thanks KBear, didn't know about this site. I'll take a look.Traffic ticket discussion board
https://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/exceeding-the-speed-limit-by-16-to-29-km-h/
Looks through the site, there is a list of steps to take.
It's a failing of the driver's powers observation and alertness not to see the cop, even if the road is clear and the day is bright and sunny. If he's travelling within the limit, there nonetheless may be dangers that develop too suddenly to avoid — kid chasing his dog out from behind a car — but those are true accidents. If he's travelling over the limit, that same danger he cannot avoid because his reaction time is just not that fast, is now his entire fault. To assume that risk he needs to be even more observant and alert to even more circumstances than a driver proceeding lawfully. The speeder needs to be checking not just the roadway, but the sidewalks, and front lawns as well, asking himself constantly, "Any possible dangers? Anything I can't reliably predict?"This ^^^
For the most part, speeding tickets are simply revenue generation for the province and provides a means to put cops on the sunshine list. Cops love it when you go to court as they can bank a lot of overtime. My cops friends are the first to admit it.
The crown almost always allows you to plead guilty to a lesser amount for simple speeding tickets. The idea being, they get their cash and don't have to waste the JP's time with a trial. Get'm in, get'm out...
They should change the slogan on the side of cruisers from "To Serve and Protect" to "To Observe and Collect." $$$$$
Dangerous failing? We don't know the conditions surrounding the OP's ticket for 25 km/h over the limit. If he was weaving in out of traffic on a busy, rainy afternoon, then yes I would consider that dangerous. But if it was a clear sunny day with no traffic, then it's a completely different situation. He still deserves to get a ticket but the speed alone doesn't tell the whole story.
It's for this reason cops (who want to write a lot of tickets) will pick what's know as "fishing holes" to set up shop. I asked my cop friend if he could set up radar on my residential street. He parked his cruiser for a few hours and only caught one guy going 15 over. Most drivers were in the 5-10 over range which they won't write you up for. In other words there's no point sitting there.
I will say travelling 40 in a 30 on my street if far more dangerous than 80 in a 60 on the Bayview extension for example (which used to be 70 btw). But once again, if the idea is to write the most amount of tickets, safety doesn't doesn't apply.
Why write 3-4 tickets a day when safety matters when you can write 25-30 when it doesn't!