Royal Spa
Toronto Escorts

Christchurch New Zealand Mosque mass shooting

HungSowel

Well-known member
Mar 3, 2017
2,693
1,600
113
You are flat out disgusting in your racist conspiracy theories.
I think he is BudPlug under a new name, he was the guy that went all kojak over youtube videos trying to exonerate that guy who drove into that woman. What a crackhead.
 

doggystyle99

Well-known member
May 23, 2010
7,906
1,205
113
For those who seen the video, ummm, where is all the blood? The guy had a 100% accuracy shot as well as there are no holes in the walls either.

Also, hospital scenes show paramedics WALKING slowly into the emergency area. Not realistic enough for me. But, maybe your eyes saw something different?
Fathammer what was your previous handle?
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,703
21
38
LOL, you are hilarious. The link you posted clearly mentioned that he shot at family members on that tram and then turned his gun on others who were trying to help his family members.
Jeez, according to your link, this is being treated as a "Criminal Case", and had nothing to do with "terrorism", unless you were meant to post a far right media that made that fake allegation!!
New incident.

"Video footage of the attack where the Senegalese man attempted to set a bus full of kidnapped children on fire. Video is not graphic but you can hear the screams. I’m surprised that such a brazen hijacking in Italy is not getting wall-to-wall coverage."

https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1108491812010786816
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,340
5,560
113
New incident.

"Video footage of the attack where the Senegalese man attempted to set a bus full of kidnapped children on fire. Video is not graphic but you can hear the screams. I’m surprised that such a brazen hijacking in Italy is not getting wall-to-wall coverage."

https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1108491812010786816
Does this rectify your fake allegation about that Turkish psychopathic idiot who killed 3 people and wounded a few more?

Anyway, the BBC have covered this incident and thankfully there are no deaths, otherwise there would have been wall to wall coverage. That idiot deserves to get a life sentence for such a horrific attack on kids:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-47642298

There are over 57000 racist attacks in the UK that also do not get wall to wall coverage either:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...tacks-uk-racist-suspects-police-a8830781.html
 

doggystyle99

Well-known member
May 23, 2010
7,906
1,205
113
For those who seen the video, ummm, where is all the blood? The guy had a 100% accuracy shot as well as there are no holes in the walls either.

Also, hospital scenes show paramedics WALKING slowly into the emergency area. Not realistic enough for me. But, maybe your eyes saw something different?
Whatever you want it to be. I can tell you its Jesus or I can tell you its Hitler. Either wont satisfy your need to spread your far left ideas and name calling.
Calling someone a racist who is actually a racist is not name calling, It's the truth.
Keep spreading your hate and racism towards people.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
59,732
6,289
113
I think he is BudPlug under a new name, he was the guy that went all kojak over youtube videos trying to exonerate that guy who drove into that woman. What a crackhead.
Don't know if I'd believe that. Bud tried to at least maintain a veneer of rational thought. Fatty is just another version of big sleazy.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,340
5,560
113
You have to give credit to the New Zealand PM. She has really acted to get rid of the assault weapons in just a couple of days and with the support of all the opposition MPs. Give her credit for achieving what Trump has no balls to do so, but just go on yapping about MAGA and Build that Wall. Stupidity to the highest level!!

New Zealand’s swift change to gun laws highlights 25 years of US inaction
Sweeping new ban that came just six days after mass shooting in Christchurch is a stark contrast to the political stalemate in the US:
New Zealand’s sweeping new ban on a range of semi-automatic rifles and large ammunition magazines, which came just six days after a mass shooting in Christchurch, has been hailed as the “fastest response ever by a government after a tragedy”.

In the US, where conservative politicians have blocked even moderate gun control for 25 years, New Zealand’s swift action was greeted as a powerful inspiration – and a reminder of how far behind the country is.

“Sandy Hook happened six years ago and we can’t even get the Senate to hold a vote on universal background checks,” Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the New York congresswoman, wrote on Twitter, referring to the 2012 shooting at an elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut, that left 20 children and six educators dead.

“This is what leadership looks like,” David Hogg, one of the students from Parkland, Florida, who founded the March for Our Lives movement for gun control after a shooting at their school last February, tweeted, sharing a video of the announcement by New Zealand’s prime minister, Jacinda Ardern.

Some Democratic presidential candidates have already pledged to support a ban on assault weapons – though one that would probably be much more limited that New Zealand’s.

“We must follow New Zealand’s lead, take on the NRA and ban the sale and distribution of assault weapons in the United States,” tweeted the Vermont senator Bernie Sanders, a 2020 Democratic presidential candidate who has been attacked for his mixed record on gun control in the past.

“We had an assault weapons ban once, and we should have it again,” Senator Kamala Harris of California, tweeted a few days after the Christchurch attacks. “These weapons of war do not belong on our streets, in our schools, or at our houses of worship. This is a fight I will take on as president.”

Pro-gun activists in the United States said that New Zealand’s aggressive action to ban ownership of previously legal guns, and enact a mandatory buyback, would never be viable in the United States.

“The US isn’t New Zealand,” Dana Loesch, a prominent gun rights activist and National Rifle Association spokeswoman, tweeted. “They do not have an inalienable right to bear arms and to self-defense, we do.”

In another tweet, she wrote: “To ‘follow these examples’ the US would need to repeal the Second Amendment, ban all semi-auto, force gun stores to show all purchases to gov’t, and spend $200 million taxpayer dollars to confiscate firearms.”

Stephen Gutowski
(@StephenGutowski)
I sure see a lot of people who like to say "nobody is coming for your guns" celebrating this confiscation effort. https://t.co/e3quZ8v7gi

March 21, 2019
Rebecca Peters, who helped lead the successful campaign to reform Australia’s gun laws in the 1990s, said she believed New Zealand’s government action was the “fastest response ever” by government officials after a mass shooting.

It took the British government seven months after the massacre of 16 children in Dunblane, Scotland, in March 1996, to announce a partial ban on handguns, which parents of the children had demanded as part of the Snowdrop Campaign.
It took the Australian government 10 days after the Port Arthur massacre in April 1996 to announce the National Firearms Agreement.

New Zealand announced the new ban on military-style weapons – one with broad support from the prime minister and the opposition – after only six days.
“It’s a small parliament. It’s a small country. And obviously, they have very high support for it,” Peters said.

In a press conference on Thursday, Ardern promised increased penalties for continued ownership of the banned weapons. New Zealand’s minister of police said police were “gearing up” to enable military-style weapons to be taken out of circulation. Police will be supported by the New Zealand defense force, he said, and would consult gun licensing records.

Ardern promised the country would continue to consider broader gun control measures on Monday, including issues such as licensing, registration and storage.

New Zealand’s swift action is a stark contrast to the political stalemate in the US, where conservative politicians have blocked any substantial gun control laws for 25 years, despite frequent high-casualty mass shootings.

The US’s last substantial action on gun control, in 1994, was a federal ban on military-style “assault weapons”. But the ban was written to expire in 10 years, and did not require Americans who already owned military-style guns to give up their weapons – it simply tried to regulate the manufacture and sale of new guns.

When it expired in 2004, an in-depth evaluation of the loophole-ridden legislation found that it could not be clearly credited with any of the nation’s drop in violence. The consensus among Democratic politicians was that the ban had backfired politically against their party, and that gun control was not a winning issue for the American left. They largely abandoned the issue for more than a decade.

Since the ban lifted, military-style rifles have become popular high-end acquisitions for American gun owners, and have become popular for target shooting, even as they have become infamous as the mass shooter’s weapon of choice. Some gun rights advocates argue that military-style rifles are necessary for self-defense, including self-defense in the home.

While there are restrictions on “assault weapons” in some parts of the US, in many places today, Americans can buy an AR-15-style rifle before they are legally allowed to buy a beer.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...ng-swift-gun-law-changes-contrast-us-inaction
 

jsanchez

Well-known member
Apr 8, 2004
2,527
1,589
113
T.O.
You have to give credit to the New Zealand PM. She has really acted to get rid of the assault weapons in just a couple of days and with the support of all the opposition MPs. Give her credit for achieving what Trump has no balls to do so, but just go on yapping about MAGA and Build that Wall. Stupidity to the highest level!!
...
Kudos to NZ's PM, she's got balls unlike the clowns south of the border.
 

SexB

A voice of common sense.
Sep 15, 2008
6,024
1,954
113
Very sad news. R.I.P.
Otherwise the mainstream media almost never talk about a pure genocide in Nigeria against Christians. 280 killed by muslim militants since February ( mostly women and children) and more than 6000 Christians just in 2018(average 20/day) because their religion.. It's not in the news but happened every day. Who cares? They are just Christians.

http://bpnews.net/52593/280-christians-killed-in-attacks-in-nigeria
https://www.christianpost.com/news/pure-genocide-over-6000-nigerian-christians-slaughtered-mostly-women-children.html
Bull fucking shit you think this is sad news.
 

PornAddict

Active member
Aug 30, 2009
3,620
0
36
60
Bull fucking shit you think this is sad news.
IRIS is correct... Christians lives worth less then Muslim. In the mainstream NEWS cycle Christians that bomb/ slaughtered/ killed by Muslim terrorism on good for a at most a couple day on news cycle. Whereas Muslim death by killed by a non Muslim get reported for more then a week in a news cycle. And constantly Muslims deaths by not nonmuslim get bombarded by the liberal mainstream media. Unfortunately they don't give even air time for both type of terrorism by Muslims against nonmuslim or by nonmuslim against Muslim. Sad fact ... Uneven biased reporting by the left/ liberal media. Therefore it look like Christians lives worth less then Muslim lives due to political correctness!
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
79,760
17,579
113
IRIS is correct... Christians lives worth less then Muslim. In the mainstream NEWS cycle Christians that bomb/ slaughtered/ killed by Muslim terrorism on good for a at most a couple day on news cycle. Whereas Muslim death by killed by a non Muslim get reported for more then a week in a news cycle. And constantly Muslims deaths by not nonmuslim get bombarded by the liberal mainstream media. Unfortunately they don't give even air time for both type of terrorism by Muslims against nonmuslim or by nonmuslim against Muslim. Sad fact ... Uneven biased reporting by the left/ liberal media. Therefore it look like Christians lives worth less then Muslim lives due to political correctness!
Really?

Have you checked the tallies from the GWOT?
Do you really have no idea how many were killed through those wars?
 

PornAddict

Active member
Aug 30, 2009
3,620
0
36
60
Really?

Have you checked the tallies from the GWOT?
Do you really have no idea how many were killed through those wars?
War ( WMD) in Iraq was a lie too! MainstreamMedia was one of the biggest cheerleader for the justification for the IRAQ war.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts