...and you have yours up nottyboi's :rofl:Nottyboi doesn't even like Trump.
...and you have yours up nottyboi's :rofl:Nottyboi doesn't even like Trump.
Wow, such devastating attacks....and you have yours up nottyboi's :rofl:
Was made easy for you to understand ...:biggrin:Wow, such devastating attacks.
If you're in grade 4.
The AG is NOT the prosecutor. ...are you literate, can you read? Good Lord. She declined to do what was in the best interest of Canada and for the govt so the PM removed her. Just for your education, here is an explaination of the situation from one of your fav right wing rags, if you are indeed able to read it:No brainer is correct.
I bet you Justin / Gerald did not read the fine print of the law they just passed and missed the section that said "prosecutors are not allowed to consider national economic interests when deciding whether to settle with a company".
They thought they had solved the problem for their friend when they passed that law and tried to implement stage 2 of their corrupt plan, using national economic interests as a justification
What they did not anticipate is that JWR did read the fine print. As a lawyer and the Minister of Justice it is her responsibility to ensure that she understood the law clearly and how it must be applied.
She did her job. Think about that before you attack her again.
Did these two clowns get tripped up by their own law they passed specifically for SNC a few months before??
I am curious, do you know if any Federal Canadian politician has been charged for corruption in our countries history?
Have any non-elected political advisors been charged?
Can they be charged for stupidity?
Apparently she views this differently. She is the Justice minister & Attorney General & is responsible for ensuring the proper administration of the law.The AG is NOT the prosecutor. ...are you literate, can you read? Good Lord.
Oh not at all, this is quite a common scheme used in many advanced economies around the world, its a criminal version of the civil chapter 11 proceedings.Apparently she views this differently. She is the Justice minister & Attorney General & is responsible for ensuring the proper administration of the law.
Beavis & Butthead planned an obvious and corrupt scheme months in advance to corrupt the administration of the law
Scheme being the defining wordOh not at all, this is quite a common scheme used in many advanced economies around the world, its a criminal version of the civil chapter 11 proceedings.
How can she view it differently, its quite explicit in its discription in the law. The AG can overrule the prosecutor
It was not only in the Liberals interest to do it, it was a path that is also good for Quebec, Canada and will still deliver justice. I don't understand why you right wingers always equate doing the "right thing" with hurting innocent people and doing economic damageScheme being the defining word
So your position is the prosecutors can not intervene on the behalf of a friend, but a specific member of the Liberal party can
Perhaps Beavis and Butthead should have gotten her onside before they wrote & snuck in the new law.
It is really too bad that they assumed she would place the liberal parties interest ahead of her commitment to integrity & justice & that of the Canadian public
Was their underlying assumption that all Liberals are just as corrupt as they are?
You are defending corruption.
What is wrong with you?
Please slither away
If this was Doug Ford you'd be saying that jobs are more important than morals in Libya.You are defending corruption.
What is wrong with you?
Please slither away
In case you didn't know, it's politicians who make the laws, and that includes the intent of the law. The last time politicians didn't make the law was when the 10 Commandments were handed down to Moses.Scheme being the defining word
So your position is the prosecutors can not intervene on the behalf of a friend, but a specific member of the Liberal party can
Perhaps Beavis and Butthead should have gotten her onside before they wrote & snuck in the new law.
It is really too bad that they assumed she would place the liberal parties interest ahead of her commitment to integrity & justice & that of the Canadian public
Was their underlying assumption that all Liberals are just as corrupt as they are?
You are defending corruption.
What is wrong with you?
Please slither away
He obviously tried to sway JWR’s opinion. BAM...It’s over. Nothing else matters. JT needs to step down.Nonsense, all Trudeau is saying is that the govt must strike a balance between these principals. Good govt is striking a balance that works. If you can have justice, and jobs why not. He said the Judiciary is independant, not the justice system. Under the deferred prosecution law the settlement MUST be approved by an independant judge.
It was not only in the Liberals interest to do it, it was a path that is also good for Quebec, Canada and will still deliver justice. I don't understand why you right wingers always equate doing the "right thing" with hurting innocent people and doing economic damage
This type of law is quite common in other jurisdictions.
Did he?JT is not supposed to interfere. He interfered.
Don't agree, are you saying he is not allowed to speak to the AG, it seems pretty clear he told her it was her decision, did not make any expression of preference or threat to her whatsoever.JT is not supposed to interfere. He interfered.
Stop making me defend the views of Right Wing losers. Progressives are better than this.
I want the Liberals to win the next election. JT fucked up. He needs to go. It’s over.
He's sure not making an effort to let her speak ....let him release her and lets hear. Sure looks suspicious to me...looks like a coverup...Did he?
Its still unclear if he did actually interfere.