Toronto Escorts

Trudeau's principal secretary, Gerald Butts, resigns amid SNC-Lavalin furor

Conil

Well-known member
Apr 12, 2013
3,433
558
113
He likely got fired for giving bad advice, some people say he was the one running the show in the background. Somehow I think this sham is not over.


OTTAWA — Gerald Butts, Justin Trudeau’s principal secretary and long-time friend, has resigned amid allegations that the Prime Minister’s Office interfered to prevent a criminal prosecution of SNC-Lavalin.

In a statement, Butts unequivocally denies the accusation that he or anyone else in the office improperly pressured former attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould to help the Montreal engineering giant avoid a criminal case on corruption and bribery charges related to government contracts in Libya.

Nevertheless, Butts says the allegation is distracting from the “vital work” Trudeau is doing so it’s in the best interests of the Prime Minister’s Office for him to step aside.

“I categorically deny the accusation that I or anyone else in his office pressured Ms. Wilson-Raybould … At all times, I and those around me acted with integrity and singular focus on the best interests of all Canadians,” he says.

“Any accusation that I or the staff put pressure on the attorney general is simply not true … But the fact is that this accusation exists. It cannot and should not take one moment away from the vital work the prime minister and his office is doing for all Canadians.

“My reputation is my responsibility and that is for me to defend. It is in the best interests of the office and its important work for me to step away.”
Wilson-Raybould resigned from Trudeau’s cabinet last week. She has not explained why and she has not commented on the allegation, levelled by anonymous sources in a Globe and Mail story 10 days ago, that she was improperly pressured, citing solicitor-client privilege. She has hired a former Supreme Court justice to advise her on what she may legally say.

Butts is one of several top Trudeau aides the opposition parties had wanted to call before the House of Commons justice committee to testify on what happened. Liberal MPs on the committee last week used their majority to limit the scope of the committee’s inquiry.


Butts has confirmed that Wilson-Raybould briefly raised the matter of SNC-Lavalin during a meeting in December; he advised her to speak with the clerk of the Privy Council, Michael Wernick.

In his statement, Butts writes positively of his relationship with Wilson-Raybould.

“I encouraged her to run for the Liberal Party of Canada and worked hard to support her as a candidate and then cabinet minister. From my perspective, our relationship has always been defined by mutual respect, candour and an honest desire to work together.”

Butts says he’s served Trudeau “to the best of my abilities and I have at all times given the prime minister free and unfettered advice.

“I have served the public interest, not the interests of any individual or any narrow private interest of any kind, at any time. Life is full of uncertainties but I am absolutely certain of that.”

Trudeau, who became friends with Butts when the two attended McGill University, tweeted about his principal secretary’s resignation: “Gerald Butts served this government — and our country — with integrity, sage advice and devotion. I want to thank him for his service and continued friendship.”


https://torontosun.com/news/nationa...uror/wcm/c44cdfcc-8725-4d61-9bae-a766ebf90b40
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,447
1,331
113
Its gonna fade quite quickly. You can't really have any inquiry as the whole SNC case is still before the courts and it would be prejudicial.
 

Zaibetter

Banned
Mar 27, 2016
4,284
1
0
But Butts said: But...But ...I did nothing wrong. :rofl:

But then why resign?
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
16,334
2,262
113
I don't think this will have serious staying power.
As a scandal its pretty minor and pushing it too hard will piss off Quebec, who like SNC.
Minor?
Trying to influence the justice system for the benefit of a corporate friend is not minor

Again you speak but you do not understand
The opposition is not going to let up, regardless of what quebec thinks

The other real big issue for Justin is from now on he will need to do his thinking by himself
Assuming he survives until the election, the next 9 months you get to watch a drama class teacher try and operate without his script writer.
And the pressure on Justin in the upcoming act is going to be intense!
It is not going to be pretty
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,462
5,650
113
Is there any allegation that Trudeau profited from this 'influence'?
None, whatsoever at the moment, as Trudeau has categorically denied it. This whole thing is like making a mountain out of a molehill. I am sure that if there is a smoking gun then Trudeau would have either stepped down or admitted to it at the very least.
If there is no smoking gun and this turns to be blown out of proportion then, this will definitely benefit the Liberals. The ones who may have been part of the real blame game have probably resigned.
We will have to see not if, but when Wilson-Raybould will finally be allowed to testify, whether she resigned due to her own misdeeds, or whether with regards to the SNC-Lavalin affair, Gerald Butts was forcing her hand in anyway, with or without Trudeau's knowledge!!
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,447
1,331
113
None, whatsoever at the moment, as Trudeau has categorically denied it. This whole thing is like making a mountain out of a molehill. I am sure that if there is a smoking gun then Trudeau would have either stepped down or admitted to it at the very least.
If there is no smoking gun and this turns to be blown out of proportion then, this will definitely benefit the Liberals. The ones who may have been part of the real blame game have probably resigned.
We will have to see not if, but when Wilson-Raybould will finally be allowed to testify, whether she resigned due to her own misdeeds, or whether with regards to the SNC-Lavalin affair, Gerald Butts was forcing her hand in anyway, with or without Trudeau's knowledge!!
Of course this will benefit the Liberals, they will highlight the fact that the Conservatives would not blink an eye about destroying a crown jewel of Quebec, and that they are the only party that can be trusted to defend Quebecs interests.....which is actually true. :Eek::Eek:
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,566
17,829
113
Of course this will benefit the Liberals, they will highlight the fact that the Conservatives would not blink an eye about destroying a crown jewel of Quebec, and that they are the only party that can be trusted to defend Quebecs interests.
Exactly, the question is whether you sacrifice Quebec jobs for morals about corruption elsewhere, while the government is still selling arms to Saudi Arabia.
Scheer can argue he's against jobs in Quebec and he really needs to take a stand about Libyan corruption.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,462
5,650
113
Exactly, the question is whether you sacrifice Quebec jobs for morals about corruption elsewhere, while the government is still selling arms to Saudi Arabia.
Scheer can argue he's against jobs in Quebec and he really needs to take a stand about Libyan corruption.
Scheer will never disclose what he would have done in this instance. We know that it would have been no different, as they are the party that have been the most welcoming to all the big lobbyist multi-national corporations. If you look at the pressure exerted by the Tobacco, Pharmaceutical or Oil Corporations, the Conservatives have always opposed any legislations that are detrimental to their relationships with those corporations. One pure example is the banning of smoking within the workplace / public places. We witnessed the scaremongering from the right with regards to hurting businesses. lost jobs etc. What was the real outcome...... a huge majority of Canadians expressed their gratitude, and businesses thrived and not suffered as predicted by the righties!!
 

WarGames

Banned
Mar 26, 2018
731
0
16
Minor?
Trying to influence the justice system for the benefit of a corporate friend is not minor

Again you speak but you do not understand
The opposition is not going to let up, regardless of what quebec thinks

The other real big issue for Justin is from now on he will need to do his thinking by himself
Assuming he survives until the election, the next 9 months you get to watch a drama class teacher try and operate without his script writer.
And the pressure on Justin in the upcoming act is going to be intense!
It is not going to be pretty
The pressure is starting to show on Trudeau - he no looka so good lately.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,447
1,331
113
Scheer will never disclose what he would have done in this instance. We know that it would have been no different, as they are the party that have been the most welcoming to all the big lobbyist multi-national corporations. If you look at the pressure exerted by the Tobacco, Pharmaceutical or Oil Corporations, the Conservatives have always opposed any legislations that are detrimental to their relationships with those corporations. One pure example is the banning of smoking within the workplace / public places. We witnessed the scaremongering from the right with regards to hurting businesses. lost jobs etc. What was the real outcome...... a huge majority of Canadians expressed their gratitude, and businesses thrived and not suffered as predicted by the righties!!
Of course it would have been different. Scheer is a western conservative. It will be hard to duck the question if he keeps using it as a cudgel. If he says "he would not have interfered" he may as well say FUCK QUEBEC!!! The Liberals will say "we felt it was important to strike a balance between upholding the law, holding companies accountable, while at the same time preserving important companies where possible, as such we introduced the deferred prosecution law, to give the judiciary and legal system an additional option if they see fit. As it is a new law and there is little precident on the books the AG may choose to intervene to ensure this law is properly applied.
 

Darts

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2017
23,061
11,164
113
First poll is out. Ipsos poll.

Scheer 36%
Trudeau 34%
Singh 17%
 

Zenyatta

Banned
Feb 5, 2019
126
0
0
Exactly, the question is whether you sacrifice Quebec jobs for morals about corruption elsewhere, while the government is still selling arms to Saudi Arabia.
Scheer can argue he's against jobs in Quebec and he really needs to take a stand about Libyan corruption.
Aren't you the one who screams about morals all the time? But now when it involves your boy Trudope, you don't care about morality.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,566
17,829
113
Aren't you the one who screams about morals all the time? But now when it involves your boy Trudope, you don't care about morality.
The correct thing would have been to not try to interfere with the decision.
But as scandals go, this one is pretty minor.

Do you think Quebec should lose those jobs in order not to do business with Libya?
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts