Seduction Spa
Toronto Escorts

Trump will sign funding bill, declare a national emergency, McConnell says

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,463
5,654
113
President Donald Trump plans to sign a compromise border security measure in conjunction with declaring a national emergency to secure funding for a border wall, ending for now a bitter standoff with Congress over his signature campaign promise but likely sparking a new constitutional dispute.

The news of Trump's decision came via Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who said he would drop his opposition to the national emergency move in order to advance the government funding measure.
Speaking on the Senate floor Thursday, McConnell sought to reassure lawmakers unsure of the President's position before taking a vote on the plan, which falls short of providing the $5 billion in border wall funding Trump had demanded.
"He has indicated he is prepared to sign the bill. He will also be issuing a national emergency declaration at the same time," McConnell said. "I've indicated to him that I'm going to support the national emergency declaration. So for all of my colleagues, the President will sign the bill. We will be voting on it shortly."
It provided reassurance amid questions about the President's support for the deal, which was struck by a bipartisan panel of negotiators. Aides had said earlier Thursday they were concerned Trump would reject the spending compromise -- a major shift from earlier this week, when officials indicated privately that he would.

McConnell's abrupt announcement Thursday that Trump would sign the spending package -- ahead of any official word from the White House on the President's position -- came after a day of consternation among Republican lawmakers and administration officials about whether the President would sign the bill.
The President's only public message was a midday tweet indicating he was still mulling the final text of the bill with his team at the White House. Even after McConnell's announcement, the White House was scrambling to make Trump's intentions official.
"President Trump will sign the government funding bill, and as he has stated before, he will also take other executive action -- including a national emergency -- to ensure we stop the national security and humanitarian crisis at the border," press secretary Sarah Sanders wrote in a statement 25 minutes after McConnell spoke. "The President is once again delivering on his promise to build the wall, protect the border, and secure our great country."

In the hours leading up to the vote, the President phoned GOP allies on Capitol Hill to ask their advice and vent at some of the bill's shortcomings, leading many to believe he was backing away from his earlier support of the compromise spending legislation, according to people familiar with the calls. Trump told multiple allies he was considering not signing the bill.
Concern over the measure's contents extended to the White House, where aides spent all morning trying to digest the details of the 1,100-page bill and flag potential snags both to the President and to Capitol Hill. In briefings about the bill, the President expressed concern that something might be found buried in the bill after he signed it, leading to embarrassment.
He huddled with his acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen and legislative affairs director Shahira Knight in the Oval Office on Thursday afternoon, as they intensely lobbied the President to not back away from the bill.
Amid the wrangling, many of the President's senior advisers stressed he should sign the package to avoid another government shutdown, which they said would damage him politically. They said signing a national emergency declaration or some other type of executive action would blunt whatever blowback he received from conservatives.
It wasn't immediately clear which path Trump would choose to secure border wall funding through a national emergency declaration. White House aides have said they expect any unilateral action to secure the funding to be met with legal challenges, and McConnell had said previously he would oppose such a move, citing presidential overreach.
He dropped that opposition on Thursday after weeks of remaining staunch in his position, revealing just how worried he was over Trump's support.
But Democratic congressional leaders said they could bring legal challenges.
"I may," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi who asked about the prospect of challenging Trump in court. "That's an option and we will review our options."
"The President is doing an end run around Congress," Pelosi added.
Advisers said Trump had grown increasingly concerned about what is contained in the 1,100-page legislation that was released late Wednesday evening.
As more details about the package emerged, conservative figures in Trump's orbit voiced new displeasure at the bill. That included Fox host Laura Ingraham, who tweeted earlier Thursday that Trump should not sign it. The White House had attempted earlier this week to bolster support among Trump's media allies.
White House officials have been digesting the text since early morning and have briefed the President as they go along. The President tweeted midday he was "reviewing the funding bill with my team."
"1,000 pages filed in the in middle of the night take a little time to go through," one White House official told CNN's Jim Acosta.
Prayers?

Lawmakers were set to begin voting on Thursday afternoon. Many expressed hope -- even prayers -- the President would ultimately approve it.
"I pray" Trump signs the bill, said Sen. Richard Shelby, the Republican chairman of the Appropriations Committee. He said he spoke with Trump Wednesday night and the President was in "good spirits."
Other Republicans said they were hoping for assurances Trump will sign the bill if it gets to his desk, possibly later on Thursday.
"We'd like to know it's a bill the President is going to sign. Hopefully they will let us know," said Sen. John Thune, the second-ranking GOP leader as he left a Republican conference lunch where the issue was discussed at length.
Others Republicans said they were still parsing the legislative text before committing to supporting the plan.
Earlier this week, Trump had signaled to advisers and allies he was inclined to sign the bipartisan deal to avoid another government shutdown, and would use executive action to attempt securing additional border wall dollars.
"I think the President's evaluating what's in the bill. He's also evaluating the authority he has and I know he'll be making a decision before the deadline," Vice President Mike Pence, who is traveling in Warsaw, told reporters Thursday.

In conversations with allies over the past days, Trump has griped that Republican negotiators were outplayed by their Democratic counterparts, securing a border funding number far smaller than Trump has spent the last two months demanding.
Privately, Trump has cast GOP's dealmaking efforts as inadequate and wondered why he, an experienced dealmaker, wasn't consulted at more regular intervals as the two sides haggled over an agreement. The White House acted largely on the sidelines while congressional negotiators struck a deal.
That was intentional, according to people familiar with the process, who noted Trump's attempts at brokering an agreement between lawmakers proved futile during the record-length government shutdown that ushered in the new year.
To appease the President, aides and some Republican lawmakers have cast the smaller figure, around $1.375 billion, as a down payment that will eventually lead to new wall construction.
Initially, Trump was distressed when he watched Sean Hannity and other Fox News hosts deride the plan, including as he watched recorded versions of prime-time programming during a late-night flight home on Monday from Texas, where he'd held a campaign rally.
After phone calls from the White House, some of Trump's allies took a softer approach, saying the deal was palatable as long as Trump went ahead with unilateral action to secure some funding for the border wall.
On Thursday, however, some of those voices returned to their initial skepticism.
"So the president has his hand forced to sign a 1,159 page bill that we KNOW is filled with amnesty, PORK and wiggle room? Total SCAM! @realDonaldTrump wasn't elected for this," Laura Ingraham wrote on Twitter. "This bill must NOT be signed by @realDonaldTrump."

https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/14/politics/donald-trump-wall-funding-bill/index.html

Hilarious how his pets like Laura Ingraham, and Sean Hannity are totally pissed off with this bill. They are two brainwashed idiots that buy this notion that somehow all the Americans will be safe if a wall is built. Hopefully, The Democrats will challenge him all the way if he decides to use the Emergency Declaration to steal from "Peter" to Pay for the Albatross of a "Paul" Wall !!
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
25,283
3,643
113
A national emergency, this is gonna be fun :thumb:

Trump played it smart, he waited to sign a deal with the Dems so he could secure his 1.37 billion for the wall, and now if his emergency gets passed by the courts he'll get even more billions. And if it doesnt get court approval then he loses nothing. Nothing gained, nothing lost
 

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
6,829
2,838
113
A national emergency, this is gonna be fun :thumb:

Trump played it smart, he waited to sign a deal with the Dems so he could secure his 1.37 billion for the wall, and now if his emergency gets passed by the courts he'll get even more billions. And if it doesnt get court approval then he loses nothing. Nothing gained, nothing lost
I hope trump wins in court. Next time a Dem takes office brace yourself for a national emergency on:
-Climate Change
-Gun violence
-Health Care
-Gender and Diversity Issues

Dems can use national emergencies to air drop drop condoms from planes and erect abortion clinics on every street corner.


https://youtu.be/dezExwB8GCM
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
46,977
8,122
113
Toronto
A national emergency, this is gonna be fun :thumb:
A national emergency is like huge earthquakes, floods, fires, Hurricanes (unless it is Puerto Rico). Please explain using rational thinking why this is now an emergency but it never was during 2017 and 2018. If it wasn't declared that then, what material change has happened to convert it from a non-emergency to emergency in the last 6 or 7 weeks. Or are you going to dig another mousehole to crawl into because you have no respectable retort.

Trump played it smart, he waited to sign a deal with the Dems so he could secure his 1.37 billion for the wall, and now if his emergency gets passed by the courts he'll get even more billions. And if it doesnt get court approval then he loses nothing. Nothing gained, nothing lost
For a guy who is supposed to be pretty smart (albeit self-proclaimed like Kat's self-proclaimed journalist) your posts today are sadly lacking in that characteristic. He has accepted hundreds of millions of dollars less than the Dems were willing to give him. So if he goes to court and loses, he has walked away from more money that he could have had as well as the shutdown that he is now reviled for and the estimated unrecoverable $3B that the shutdown cost the country.

trump Devotee syndrome is very debilitating, Phil. You used to be a much better debater before trump came along and destroyed your ability to think independently and rationally. If I believed in a god, I would consider praying for you.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,691
17,859
113
I hope trump wins in court. Next time a Dem takes office brace yourself for a national emergency on:
-Climate Change
-Gun violence
-Health Care
-Gender and Diversity Issues

Dems can use national emergencies to air drop drop condoms from planes and erect abortion clinics on every street corner.


https://youtu.be/dezExwB8GCM
Totally, when Trump is impeached he'll have set it up for the dems to make big changes that much easier.
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
25,283
3,643
113
He has accepted hundreds of millions of dollars less than the Dems were willing to give him. So if he goes to court and loses, he has walked away from more money that he could have had as well as the shutdown that he is now reviled for and the estimated unrecoverable $3B that the shutdown cost the country
Not true. Pelosi wanted to give Trump ZERO dollars for his wall: https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/31/nancy-pelosi-border-wall-1139308

A national emergency is like huge earthquakes, floods, fires, Hurricanes (unless it is Puerto Rico). Please explain using rational thinking why this is now an emergency but it never was during 2017 and 2018. If it wasn't declared that then, what material change has happened to convert it from a non-emergency to emergency in the last 6 or 7 weeksg, Phil. You used to be a much better debater before trump came along and destroyed your ability to think independently and rationally. If I believed in a god, I would consider praying for you.
Trump might argue the continuous caravans that pose a threat. Also the drug dealing (especially fentanyl) has gotten much worse over the last year or two.
Overdoses are at an alltime high. A wall might not stop everything, but it might stop a but
 

wigglee

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2010
9,833
1,612
113
Illegal immigration may be a problem, but calling it a national emergency is insane and an abuse of power which should be shutdown immediately. But what do partisan zealots care about the Constitution ? The destruction of democracy continues....
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,691
17,859
113
Illegal immigration may be a problem, but calling it a national emergency is insane and an abuse of power which should be shutdown immediately. But what do partisan zealots care about the Constitution ? The destruction of democracy continues....
Trump will be able to announce it and declare it a success even though it will be stuck in court and never happen.
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,971
6,110
113
A national emergency, this is gonna be fun :thumb:

Trump played it smart, he waited to sign a deal with the Dems so he could secure his 1.37 billion for the wall, and now if his emergency gets passed by the courts he'll get even more billions. And if it doesnt get court approval then he loses nothing. Nothing gained, nothing lost
Really smart. Shut down the government causing untold financial harm to millions and then settle for less money, less barrier etc. Yes he is a master negotiator. I am selling my house. i think I will take a lesson from the Art of the Deal. Hopefully I can get an offer for less money than I am asking.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
Illegal immigration may be a problem, but calling it a national emergency is insane and an abuse of power which should be shutdown immediately. But what do partisan zealots care about the Constitution ? The destruction of democracy continues....
The Chief Executive has the Constitutional power specifically assigned to him to invoke an emergency. So, there goes that argument.
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,971
6,110
113
The Chief Executive has the Constitutional power specifically assigned to him to invoke an emergency. So, there goes that argument.
Only if you ignore the Constitution. Have you ever actually read it? Try it sometime.
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
25,283
3,643
113
Trump will get funding for his wall from a variety of sources: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/landmines-border-bill-trump-hell-sign/story?id=61047358

ABC News has learned the president plans to announce on Friday his intention to spend about $8 billion on the border wall with a mix of spending from Congressional appropriations approved Thursday night, executive action and an emergency declaration.

A senior White House official familiar with the plan told ABC News that $1.375 billion would come from the spending bill Congress passed Thursday; $600 million would come from the Treasury Department's drug forfeiture fund; $2.5 billion would come from the Pentagon's drug interdiction program; and through an emergency declaration: $3.5 billion from the Pentagon's military construction budget
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,495
11
38
A national emergency, this is gonna be fun :thumb:

Trump played it smart, he waited to sign a deal with the Dems so he could secure his 1.37 billion for the wall, and now if his emergency gets passed by the courts he'll get even more billions. And if it doesnt get court approval then he loses nothing. Nothing gained, nothing lost
Nothing lost except the notion that The United States is governed by honourable people who respect the Constitution. Nothing lost except his last opportunity to pick up those missing millions of votes he'll need if he's crass enough to run again in '20, after faking-up an entire national emergency to get his simple pet construction project built. Not like it's something complicated with floors and a roof or anything.

But when all that motivates you is 'Make Me Believe I'm Great, at last', then going for The Big Stupid Loss is not outta the question. After all, even his Party agreed this deal could count as 'the wall'. He's just ham-fistedly clawed his way into a self-made box he can't see a way out of without a promise of something (he's never sad what) he can label WALL from sea to shining sea, and he never was smart enough to figure out to see how to get it.

All he had to do was say, "Thanks guys. It's a start. See you for Section 2 next year".
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,691
17,859
113
Trump announces he didn't need to declare an emergency, thereby guaranteeing he'll lose every court case on the matter.

"I could do the wall over a longer period of time. I didn't need to do this, but I'd rather do it much faster," President Trump to @PeterAlexander on national emergency declaration to secure funding for border wall. http://nbcnews.to/2DGF771
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
Only if you ignore the Constitution. Have you ever actually read it? Try it sometime.
That is the problem with you kids, these days. You run to the founding document when you think it will work for you-like McCabe trying a coup based on the 25th Amendment. Other than that, the Constitution might as well not exist. Unfortunately, for you, Trump is on a solid legal ground, but don't worry, the SCOTUS will get a say, too.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts