Toronto Escorts

Russiagate Is Finished

Big Sleazy

Active member
Sep 13, 2004
3,535
8
38
Well it's done. I guess all the trolls can start apologizing for all the MSM BS that they've been spewing for the last 2+ years. It's OK. You can man up. Everybody is entitled to a mistake or two. Or if it helps you can take up the 12 step plan offered at Trolls Anonymous. You just have to take the first step. Admit publicly you're a troll and just say you need some help. There are people out there that will reach out to you. Stop seeing yourself as the pathetic troll you've been and stand up on your own two feet. We're here to help.

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2019/02/russiagate-is-finished.html
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
25,277
3,639
113
You have to be a complete fucking moron to still believe that Trump colluded with Russia
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,614
17,841
113

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
25,277
3,639
113
You have to be a fucking moron to think that Trump isn't a lying cheat who isn't telling the truth about his Russian connections.

Russians tried to hack Clinton server on day Trump urged email search
Prosecutors say spies began hacking on 27 July 2016
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...hillary-clinton-email-server-trump-indictment
You left out the most important part

but indictment does not suggest direct link with Trump’s request
You fail again, Frankie
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,971
6,110
113
You have to be a complete fucking moron to still believe that Trump colluded with Russia
I agree with you. I am just amazed that most criminal and other investigations are not ended before they are completed or that most police and investigators do not come to conclusions before the investigations are complete. What are they thinking.
 

WarGames

Banned
Mar 26, 2018
731
0
16
We had to hear 3 years of this shit! How he was guilty. how we was going to be impeached! How he's Putin's butt boy! Do you think the morally superior Liberal/Progressives will apologize?? Hell to the NO.
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,495
11
38
Well it's done. I guess all the trolls can start apologizing for all the MSM BS that they've been spewing for the last 2+ years. It's OK. You can man up. Everybody is entitled to a mistake or two. Or if it helps you can take up the 12 step plan offered at Trolls Anonymous. You just have to take the first step. Admit publicly you're a troll and just say you need some help. There are people out there that will reach out to you. Stop seeing yourself as the pathetic troll you've been and stand up on your own two feet. We're here to help.

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2019/02/russiagate-is-finished.html
From the OP's source: "… investigators would unearth new and more explosive evidence of Trump campaign coordination with Russians. Mueller may yet do so" [my emphasis]. From finished. Hasn't even reported.

Of course 'Moon of Alabama' is taken from the Kurt Weill song about dulling your brain and your pain at the next whiskey bar. So it's little wonder your source lives in delirium, BS.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,614
17,841
113
Manafort guilty about lying about Russian dealings.
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/429917-judge-rules-manafort-lied-multiple-times-to-fbi-mueller

Video of Trump meeting with Russians in Moscow in 1995.
Trump shown ‘meeting with Russians in Moscow in 1995’ over ‘building project’ in newly unearthed video
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...il&utm_term=0_9813b73b1a-3b9654b6df-166001349

Trump Wanted $20 Million for 2006 Moscow Deal: Developer
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...il&utm_term=0_9813b73b1a-3b9654b6df-166001349

Lobbyist received half a million in Russia-linked deposits around 2016 Trump Tower meeting: report
https://thehill.com/homenews/admini...lf-a-million-in-russia-linked-deposits-around
 

Darts

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2017
23,061
11,165
113
Don Lemon and Chris Cuomo said on CNN to-night that the Mueller Report will be DOA.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,462
5,654
113
Trump will try to block Mueller's Report from being released. But with so many Russian operatives involved, at the very least the Trump's Campaign seems like they have had some collusion. Mueller will be spending even more time now that the Judge has ruled that Manafort was definitely lying in his connections to the Russians, and the money involved, along with Trump's statement after that meeting that Crimea prefers to be a part of Russia. That meeting with Kilimnik was a very sleazy one for it to be covered up. Especially, the timing of it!!
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,614
17,841
113
Having nothing but a fake Russian Dossier, bought and paid for by political opponents - a fact he was well aware of, Mr. McCabe took it upon himself to "fix" the voters' mistake.
Nah, that was all based on what Trump said and did, firing Comey and saying that it was because of the Russia investigation.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
46,945
8,119
113
Toronto
You have to be a complete fucking moron to still believe that Trump colluded with Russia
Only a fool would draw any final conclusion while Mueller has released nothing that says anything about trump one way or the other.

A question that I previously asked:

The doctor is running some tests on you for a potentially serious condition. He says the test results should be ready in a week. Two weeks pass and you have heard nothing.

1)Do you assume that there is no problem? Only a complete fucking moron would think I am sick, since he is taking more than twice the anticipated time to report back to me.

2)Or do you assume nothing regarding the diagnosis until you hear back from him?

Any response that does not choose one of these two is proof that you choice is definitely number 2.
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
25,277
3,639
113
Only a fool would draw any final conclusion while Mueller has released nothing that says anything about trump one way or the other.

A question that I previously asked:

The doctor is running some tests on you for a potentially serious condition. He says the test results should be ready in a week. Two weeks pass and you have heard nothing.

1)Do you assume that there is no problem? Only a complete fucking moron would think I am sick, since he is taking more than twice the anticipated time to report back to me.

2)Or do you assume nothing regarding the diagnosis until you hear back from him?

Any response that does not choose one of these two is proof that you choice is definitely number 2
I choose #3

If Mueller had something significant on Trump it wouldve leaked a long time ago. Very hard to keep secrets in politics.
Couple that with the fact that insiders have said the final report will be very anti-climatic (heck, even left-wing CNN have said so), and it should be clear to even the most dimwitted person on earth that you've been totally strung along by the mainstream media for TV ratings
 

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
6,829
2,838
113
Wrong Again

Well it's done. I guess all the trolls can start apologizing for all the MSM BS that they've been spewing for the last 2+ years. It's OK. You can man up. Everybody is entitled to a mistake or two. Or if it helps you can take up the 12 step plan offered at Trolls Anonymous. You just have to take the first step. Admit publicly you're a troll and just say you need some help. There are people out there that will reach out to you. Stop seeing yourself as the pathetic troll you've been and stand up on your own two feet. We're here to help.

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2019/02/russiagate-is-finished.html

Warner splits with Burr on collusion question

Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, rejected Republican Chairman Richard Burr's recent statements that the committee has not found evidence of collusion, saying the investigation is still ongoing and the committee still had to interview key witnesses.

"Respectfully, I disagree," Warner said Tuesday. "I'm not going to get into any conclusions I've reached because my basis of this has been that I'm not going to reach any conclusion until we finish the investigation. And we still have a number of the key witnesses to come back."

Warner's comments represented a rare public split for the leaders of the Senate Intelligence Committee, which has been the only congressional panel that has kept its investigation into Russia's 2016 election meddling on a bipartisan track.

Burr and Warner have managed to conduct a bipartisan investigation for more than two years, as their staffs have quietly interviewed more than 200 witnesses and reviewed more than 300,000 pages of documents as part of the probe. But they have put off making conclusions about the collusion question, and the split is a signal that they could struggle to stay on the same page as the committee attempts to write its report on 2016 election meddling.

Last week, Burr told CBS News that the committee did not have facts indicating collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

"If we write a report based upon the facts that we have, then we don't have anything that would suggest there was collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia," Burr said.

A Democratic aide acknowledged that the committee has not uncovered direct evidence of collusion. But the aide argued that the number of episodes that have been discovered — among them the Trump Tower meeting with an offer for "dirt" on Hillary Clinton, former Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos being told by a London professor of "dirt," Roger Stone's connections to WikiLeaks and the Trump Tower Moscow discussions extending into the 2016 campaign — point to plenty of circumstantial evidence of collusion.

"None of those facts are in dispute," the aide said. "Only what they mean."

President Donald Trump has seized upon Burr's statements to claim the committee has found no collusion, though Burr hedged his statement to CBS — and similar previous comments about finding evidence of collusion — by saying the investigation is not yet wrapped.

"The only thing I've addressed is whether we had facts that suggest there was (collusion). We don't have any," Burr told reporters on Tuesday. Asked whether the committee's investigation exonerated Trump, Burr said: "Just saying what factually we've found to date. We haven't finished our investigation."

In the CBS interview, Burr suggested that the committee would focus on getting agreement on the facts, and let people make their own conclusions.

Warner noted that the committee is getting close to the end of its investigation, but there were still key witnesses to speak to, including Trump's former lawyer Michael Cohen, whose scheduled Tuesday interview was postponed.

"What we do know, and it's part of the public record, there's never been a campaign in American history that during the campaign and its aftermath that the campaign folks affiliated with the campaign had as many ties with Russia as the Trump campaign did," Warner said. "You get far down a thread and then it is interesting there are a number of the same people that ends up at the end of those threads, and many of those are the people we need to have come back and talk to us."

Cohen was one of a number of witnesses, including Michael Flynn, Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and his deputy Rick Gates, that the committee wants to interview but has not yet since they were charged by the special counsel, the aide said, so the panel didn't interfere with Mueller's probe,

Warner told CNN last month the accidental disclosure from Manafort's court filing that he was accused of sharing polling data with Konstantin Kilimnik — whom the special counsel has accused of having ties to Russian intelligence — was the "closest we've seen" to collusion


https://www.google.ca/amp/s/amp.cnn...r-senate-russia-collusion-question/index.html

Last night you went to bed. It wasn’t snowing when you fell asleep and it wasn’t snowing when you woke up, but there is a foot of snow on the ground. You didn’t see it snow. No witnesses can testify they saw it snow. There aren’t any photos or videos of it snowing. There is no direct evidence that it snowed. After ruling out a snow-making machine, or a movie production crew capable of creating a snow scene, you have to conclude that it snowed. You infer one fact from another. There is no other reasonable or logical conclusion that you can draw. You don’t need direct evidence to prove something. In fact, the law makes no distinction between the weight given to direct or circumstantial evidence.


Dear BigSleazy: Don’t you get tired of looking dumb? Or are you just used to it at this point? Regardless, please get on your knees and start grovelling, apologizing, and begging the forgiveness of your Progressive overlords.

:)
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
46,945
8,119
113
Toronto
I choose #3

If Mueller had something significant on Trump it wouldve leaked a long time ago. Very hard to keep secrets in politics.
Couple that with the fact that insiders have said the final report will be very anti-climatic (heck, even left-wing CNN have said so), and it should be clear to even the most dimwitted person on earth that you've been totally strung along by the mainstream media for TV ratings
So you agree that you would wait to hear from the doctor before making an assumption.

That is not a #3, that is the same full of holes swiss cheese argument that you tDS sufferers keep making and it is lame. I gave you a perfectly analogous situation and you ran and ducked. And everybody can see that your reasoning is lame and hypocritical and now that you have demonstrated it, you are as exposed as Sideshow Butler.

I painted you into a corner and like a mouse, you ran and hid. The only thing that I have been strung along with is that I understand that I cannot make an assumption without seeing Mueller's report. The same as that you have to wait for the doctor's report regardless if it is way overdue.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts