Wow, what insight!Not if you turn off the energy stupid
I'm going to write to AOC right now and tell her not to turn off all the power.
Phew, that was close.
Larue, you write a lost of stupid shit, but that might be a new top stupid statement.
Wow, what insight!Not if you turn off the energy stupid
This expensive leftist Latin American plan sounds doable.Was watching Pramila Jayapal on CNN talk about the GND.
Be afraid be very afraid. This sounds like War on Poverty II, War on Poverty I was an unmitigated disaster. The U.S. is currently spending a trillion dollars in the "War on Poverty" and the poverty rate now is actually 25% higher when President Johnson started the war.
Haven't had time to read it, but with extreme weather damage projected to keep increasing its bound to be cheaper, even just based off of the numbers thrown around here.Let's try again.
Frankfooter, your statement that "the new deal will be cheaper..." confirms that you now claim to be familiar with the contents.
So answer the question: Do you support the Green New Deal?
At the very least, clear up the mystery of why you're so afraid to answer the question.
I recall you claiming "we will be off fossil fuels in 10 years anyways " in the pipeline thread & you have posted hundreds of times proclaiming the absolute truth of climate changeWow, what insight!
I'm going to write to AOC right now and tell her not to turn off all the power.
Phew, that was close.
Larue, you write a lost of stupid shit, but that might be a new top stupid statement.
I recall you admitting you're an idiot.I recall you claiming "we will be off fossil fuels in 10 years anyways " in the pipeline thread & you have posted hundreds of times proclaiming the absolute truth of climate change
You have not read it, you say?Haven't had time to read it, but with extreme weather damage projected to keep increasing its bound to be cheaper, even just based off of the numbers thrown around here.
OMG! According to Avi Lewis, it takes little more than seven minutes to read the 14-page document.Haven't had time to read it....
No once again you have it wrongI recall you admitting you're an idiot.
AOCs goals are 100% complete elimination of fossil fuels & nuclear in 10 years, she was quite clearBy the way, who was claiming that they would 'shut off all the power'?
Do you recall who said that?
That's not what it says.No once again you have it wrong
You wore the dunce cap, then just as now
AOCs goals are 100% complete elimination of fossil fuels & nuclear in 10 years, she was quite clear
That is 90% of the power in the US. so yeah she wants to shut it off & she has a timeline
What is the distinguishing difference between accomplished and done ???That's not what it says.
https://cleantechnica.com/2019/02/0...on-introduced-by-rep-alexandra-ocasio-cortez/
It says the goals should be accomplished through a 10 year mobilization, not that the work would be done totally in 10 years.
accomplished
adjective US /əˈkɑm·plɪʃt/
able to do or finish something successfully:
So againdone
adjective [ after verb ] UK /dʌn/ US /dʌn/
done adjective [ after verb ] (DEALT WITH)
If something is done, or you are done with it, it is finished, or you have finished doing, using it, etc.:
I thought you claimed that consensus doesn't matter.Consensus opinion is that it is more comical than anything else
Do you deny this plan is ridiculous ?
Not at all I am just asking what you opinion of the plan isI thought you claimed that consensus doesn't matter.
Are you changing your mind again?
Sorry larue, but my views are more represented by mainstream Canadians then yours.Not at all I am just asking what you opinion of the plan is
As a hard core socialist ...
A hard core commie like you says his views are more represented by mainstream Canadians. I do not think soSorry larue, but my views are more represented by mainstream Canadians then yours.
That is not the reason I would call her a socialist. It is more like the fact she claims to be a Social democrate, wants to abolish airplanes & have the government manage societyCalling people who support government funded medical care 'socialists' doesn't put you in the mainstream.
i do not deny climate change. The climate has been changing constantly for the last 4.5 B years & I expect it to continue to changeJust as your views as a denier of science put you on the fringe on the climate change issue as well.
Them's the facts, johnnyboy!A hard core commie like you says his views are more represented by mainstream Canadians. I do not think so
https://www.citynews1130.com/2018/11/30/poll-canadians-climate-change/The Angus Reid Institute’s latest poll suggests one in 10 Canadians believe climate change is a theory that hasn’t been proven. Another 20 per cent believe it’s caused by natural causes, and not human activity.
Again science by polls does not prove a hypothesis.Them's the facts, johnnyboy!
https://www.citynews1130.com/2018/11/30/poll-canadians-climate-change/
Only 1 in 10 back your crazy views.
I never said it did, johnnyboy.Again science by polls does not prove a hypothesis.
Judging by that poll, I'd guess 90%.I wonder how many of those polled could accurately describe what role CO2 plays in nature ?
Or accurately describe the why CO2 is considered a greenhouse gas and nitrogen is not ?
If it didn't mean 4 more years of Trump I'd campaign door-to-door for them myself.AOC is the best thing to happen to the Republicans in a long time.
The Democrats need to muzzle her fast.
Trump`s dream opponent would be Elizabeth Warren with AOC as her running mate.
And I pointed out to you that scientific hypothesis are not proven by pollsI never said it did, johnnyboy.
Pay attention.
I claimed your views were extremist, and that poll says its so.
Actually, since you can not answer the questions properly, it means 90% know more than you do, although I believe that to be far too harsh for the residual 10%Judging by that poll, I'd guess 90%.
Which would be 90% who know more than you, right?