Toronto Escorts

Amidst Global Warming Hysteria, NASA Expects Global Cooling

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
26,131
6,340
113
Room 112
Atmospheric temperatures again, kirk.

I know your home in the clouds is lovely and all, but the rest of us live on the surface of the planet which is why we all talk about surface temperatures, not the temp in the clouds.
Carry on.
It's the only true measure of global temperature. The surface temperature record is not a global measurement. Nothing in the mountains. Nothing in the deserts. Nothing in the forests. Very little in the oceans. All it is is an average of weather station records located in densely populated urban areas. Not properly adjusted for the urban heat island effect. And data that doesn't fit their narrative is ignored and replaced with computer model simulated guesstimates. It's a joke.
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
26,131
6,340
113
Room 112
Let me know when you plan to start living and growing food in the upper atmosphere.
Is it really your contention that warmer temperatures and more atmospheric co2 is bad for plant growth and crop yields?
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
25,135
3,572
113
Science is hard for you, isn't it Phil.
Its hard to understand that the climate can change, that its getting warming but we also risk, at the same time, stopping a mechanism that spreads the warmth around the Northern Hemisphere/Atlantic Ocean.

What its doing right now is keeping us in one of the few spots on the planet that hasn't been warming up as equally as the rest of the planet.




http://www.realclimate.org/index.ph...ger-of-a-breakdown-of-the-gulf-stream-system/
The problem with your graph is it shows the Southern Ontario area as being warmer, when it clearly isnt getting warmer here
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
79,716
17,561
113
It's the only true measure of global temperature. The surface temperature record is not a global measurement. Nothing in the mountains. Nothing in the deserts. Nothing in the forests. Very little in the oceans. All it is is an average of weather station records located in densely populated urban areas. Not properly adjusted for the urban heat island effect. And data that doesn't fit their narrative is ignored and replaced with computer model simulated guesstimates. It's a joke.
That's an incredibly stupid and wrong statement.
Of course surface temps are recorded around the planet and incorporate ocean temps.

You're just trying a really bad bait and switch here, trying to replace the surface temps, where we live and grow our food, with measurements in the clouds.
What next, are you going to use the temperatures in the outer atmosphere or in space where they show absolutely no increases?
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
25,135
3,572
113
Using your own confirmation bias and personal opinions to complain about solid measurements is pretty sad, Phil
That doesnt change the fact your stupid map shows S. Ontario warming up, when clearly it isnt.
Your words exactly below:

AMOC slowdown.

That's the big worry and the most likely reason why the east coast and us are experiencing lower temperatures
Your map shows Toronto warming, not cooling. It was +2 Celsius when I woke up this morning....LOL.

You dont even know what you write anymore, Frankfoot
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
26,131
6,340
113
Room 112
That's an incredibly stupid and wrong statement.
Of course surface temps are recorded around the planet and incorporate ocean temps.

You're just trying a really bad bait and switch here, trying to replace the surface temps, where we live and grow our food, with measurements in the clouds.
What next, are you going to use the temperatures in the outer atmosphere or in space where they show absolutely no increases?
Tell me specifically what is wrong with my statement? Are there weather station(s) in the Sahara Desert? In the Himalayan mountains? In the Amazon rain forest? In the Canadian Arctic there is 1 weather station in Eureka. 1 weather station for a land mass that is greater than the continental United States! How many weather buoys are in the oceans which comprise 70% of the planet? It's an absolute joke to say that we have an accurate surface temperature record today, let alone in 1950 or in 1900. Yet we have idiots who want to de carbonise the planet using this shitty data. They want us to go back to living in caves. Fucking twats.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
79,716
17,561
113
Tell me specifically what is wrong with my statement? Are there weather station(s) in the Sahara Desert? In the Himalayan mountains? In the Amazon rain forest? In the Canadian Arctic there is 1 weather station in Eureka. 1 weather station for a land mass that is greater than the continental United States! How many weather buoys are in the oceans which comprise 70% of the planet? It's an absolute joke to say that we have an accurate surface temperature record today, let alone in 1950 or in 1900. Yet we have idiots who want to de carbonise the planet using this shitty data. They want us to go back to living in caves. Fucking twats.

We live on the surface and we grow our food on the surface.
Not in the clouds.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
79,716
17,561
113
I heard a funny statement on the news last night.

They said the Arctic is at its warmest in 10,000 years!!! LMAO!!!https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/arctic-warmest-in-10000-years-1.5094392

I didnt know we recorded temps let alone in the Arctic 10,000 years ago!! LMAO!!!

You doomsdayers must have eaten up that bullshit all night?!! USE YOUR HEADS!!!
I think you've been using your head to open bottles of beers and heavy doors again.

We present a ~13.6 ka summer temperature reconstruction in central Yukon, part of Eastern Beringia, using precipitation isotopes in syngenetic permafrost. The reconstruction shows that early Holocene summers were consistently warmer than the Holocene mean, as supported by midges, and a thermal maximum at ~7.6–6.6 ka BP. This maximum was followed by a ~6 ka cooling, and later abruptly reversed by industrial-era warming leading to a modern climate that is unprecedented in the Holocene context and exceeds the Holocene thermal maximum by +1.7 ± 0.7 °C.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-09622-y

You wanna tell us what's wrong with that study?
 

Fathammer

Banned
Mar 9, 2018
961
0
0
I think you've been using your head to open bottles of beers and heavy doors again.


https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-09622-y

You wanna tell us what's wrong with that study?
Whats wrong with the CBC's coverage? Sound stupid even to you? Dont just say something about me. Tell me why you think the article is stupid.

Any study on Pro-Climate change is skewed. Govt paid scientists working in the best interest of govt profit making. Plain and simple.

The Global warming/Climate change theory is a hoax. Its main objective is to make money.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
79,716
17,561
113
Any study on Pro-Climate change is skewed. Govt paid scientists working in the best interest of govt profit making. Plain and simple.
If that were true, then how come scientists working under right wing governments all around the world still come up with the same answers?
Wouldn't those governments just buy some contrary researchers if it were that easy to fudge the results?
How come all the scientists in the US haven't changed their views on climate change now that Trump is in power?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
79,716
17,561
113
Whats wrong with the CBC's coverage? Sound stupid even to you? Dont just say something about me. Tell me why you think the article is stupid.

Any study on Pro-Climate change is skewed. Govt paid scientists working in the best interest of govt profit making. Plain and simple.

The Global warming/Climate change theory is a hoax. Its main objective is to make money.
I'll write this slowly, so that maybe it helps you understand.

The CBC article reported on the study published at the nature link I posted.
So I went straight to the study to read how they came up with their results.
Its basic research skills, buddy.

So do you have a problem with the study and its work, as I posted, or are you judging the study entirely by the CBC article?
 

Fathammer

Banned
Mar 9, 2018
961
0
0
I'll write this slowly, so that maybe it helps you understand.

The CBC article reported on the study published at the nature link I posted.
So I went straight to the study to read how they came up with their results.
Its basic research skills, buddy.

So do you have a problem with the study and its work, as I posted, or are you judging the study entirely by the CBC article?
Buddy, they claim the Arctic is at its warmest in the last 10,000 years. Who was here 10,000 years ago to record arctic temps???

If you cant make sense of those numbers, then I finally see who im debating with.....ugh!
 

Fathammer

Banned
Mar 9, 2018
961
0
0
If that were true, then how come scientists working under right wing governments all around the world still come up with the same answers?
Wouldn't those governments just buy some contrary researchers if it were that easy to fudge the results?
How come all the scientists in the US haven't changed their views on climate change now that Trump is in power?
Can you tell me which scientists are working under a soo called Right-wing govt???? Scientists are supposed to be biased.

Now, when someone FUNDS (key word) scientists, then those scientists have an obligation to support any claims their money handlers need them to. They simply DONT BITE THE HAND THAT FEEDS THEM!!!

Its really that simple! Trump doesnt fund scientists. PROOF:https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/trump-seeks-big-cuts-to-science-funding-mdash-again/

Special interest groups do:https://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/0_0_0/who_pays
https://www.nber.org/reporter/summer00/grosshelp.html
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
25,135
3,572
113
Buddy, they claim the Arctic is at its warmest in the last 10,000 years. Who was here 10,000 years ago to record arctic temps???

If you cant make sense of those numbers, then I finally see who im debating with.....ugh!
They used permafrost samples to come up with those numbers
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
79,716
17,561
113
Buddy, they claim the Arctic is at its warmest in the last 10,000 years. Who was here 10,000 years ago to record arctic temps???

If you cant make sense of those numbers, then I finally see who im debating with.....ugh!
OMG!

You are so right!
There are no 10,000 year old people!
How could they be so stupid!

Phew, that was close.

Ok, sarcasm off, back to pointing out your inability to read.
Go back to the original CBC article. Click on the link for the actual study, the nature.com link that I posted.
Is that too hard for you, can you get there?
Now, read the summary of paper, the same one I quoted you.

There in the summary they noted that they didn't rely on any 10,000 year old people.
They used this: precipitation isotopes in syngenetic permafrost

I hope that wasn't too complicated for you.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
79,716
17,561
113
Can you tell me which scientists are working under a soo called Right-wing govt???? Scientists are supposed to be biased.

Now, when someone FUNDS (key word) scientists, then those scientists have an obligation to support any claims their money handlers need them to. They simply DONT BITE THE HAND THAT FEEDS THEM!!!

Its really that simple! Trump doesnt fund scientists. PROOF:https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/trump-seeks-big-cuts-to-science-funding-mdash-again/

Special interest groups do:https://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/0_0_0/who_pays
https://www.nber.org/reporter/summer00/grosshelp.html
Stephen Harper funded scientists for a long time, yet Canadian researchers still came up with the same results.
Exxon paid for their own research as well, guess what their fossil fuel scientists round out?

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/exxon-knew-about-climate-change-almost-40-years-ago/

Your claim is totally ridiculous. There is now way that over the last 40 years every, conservative, liberal, socialist or communist government in over 100 countries has some how gotten together to only fund scientists who would fake research results.

Ridiculous.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts