I stand behind my statement that NOBODY AT 97 years of age should be driving!!! Did you not read that HE WAS IN AN ACCIDENT????? Guess that doesnt matter to you?Do you have even a tiny bit of evidence that Phillip hadn't passed whatever is the UK's version of the age/ability tests that most jurisdictions require? And are you now replacing your earlier flat statements " that someone that old is incapable of driving a car SAFELY!", and "at 97, NOBODY should be driving!!!" with this entirely different proposal to test that ability?
Whoever might perhaps believe in letting "… someone drive "because why not?"", we haven't heard from them in this thread.
What part of that age do you think its ok? I explained myself, however I noticed members from this board that dont agree with someone NEVER give their reasons for what they think is right! All you guys do is try to rip apart someones ideas and pass them off as crazy!
Its your turn to tell me why you think someone that old should still be driving! How about you put your child in that persons car for a drive and tell me you arent the least bit nervous!