Ambition Spa
Toronto Escorts

The Ottawa GFE MAs (list, votes and reviews)

Master Cuddles

Active member
Jul 22, 2018
225
164
43
A wonderful and sensual +1 for Dana @ CMJ
Her body slides are absolutely sensual and her massage skills are a true delight.
 

CuddleBuddy2

Sensuality Seeker
May 20, 2018
480
421
63
How does one vote if a session wasn't good enough for a +1 and not bad enough for a -1.
Don't want to give a +1 and mislead other clients and a -1 wouldn't be fair to the lady. I guess don't post anything ?
 

RockNRollMachin

Active member
Aug 8, 2019
488
172
43
How does one vote if a session wasn't good enough for a +1 and not bad enough for a -1.
Don't want to give a +1 and mislead other clients and a -1 wouldn't be fair to the lady. I guess don't post anything ?
With all the options available, I'd say if it's not a fuck yes, it's a no.
 

keats

New member
Aug 3, 2019
47
0
0
How does one vote if a session wasn't good enough for a +1 and not bad enough for a -1.
Don't want to give a +1 and mislead other clients and a -1 wouldn't be fair to the lady. I guess don't post anything ?
I'd withhold your vote one way or the other - I'd expect that's what most would do.
 

randomott

Active member
Mar 2, 2017
287
134
43
Juliette BC +1
Krystina BC +1
Lily BC +1
Melanie BC +1
Penelope BC -1 (Probably chemistry but no way I can give the encounter a +1)
 

CuddleBuddy2

Sensuality Seeker
May 20, 2018
480
421
63
With all the options available, I'd say if it's not a fuck yes, it's a no.
I'm an outsider to this thread/topic but I'll give you my perspective. Everyone should know that this is extremely YMMV. imo there's nothing wrong with giving a -1. If she has multiple +1 and only one -1, then other members should know that it is YMMV. but is she gets very little +1 and several -1, then the YMMV may not be the case.

I find MANY members on this board are "scared" to post negative feedback... Maybe too many reveal their handle identity and then their are muzzled?

Negative feedback can easily be worded into "recommendation for improvements" which would be helpful to members and Providers.
The thing is she meets all the Criteria for the GFE defined in this thread. Actually she provided a bit more than the "low bar" requirement. Also in the past I've given +1 for lesser service as long as she was sweet and there was chemistry.
I feel all the ladies at Brass Club and CMJ would meet the "low bar" criteria, so how does one differentiate a +1 for a really friendly GFE MA from a +1 for someone who meets the criteria but not into it i.e no passion. Can a lack of chemistry or interest be enough to give someone a -1. Why are members giving -1 ? Should the reasons be posted ?
I was wondering if a "A+" column could be added to the spread sheet so votes can be given to ladies who go beyond the criteria. Reasons for a A+ vote could be good chemistry or really friendly or passionate or eager to please or exemplary body sides or great massage skills in addition to the low bar criteria.
Thoughts ?
 

CuddleBuddy2

Sensuality Seeker
May 20, 2018
480
421
63
In that case, don't even vote in this thread, and go to a specific thread about her (or start one, if one doesn't exist) and explain all of your pros and cons.
I might do this later.
 

booby25

Member
Aug 6, 2006
67
97
18
Huge +1 for Iris at CMJ
Huge +1 for Capri also at CMJ.... Two awesome sessions and such sweethearts !!
 

Master Cuddles

Active member
Jul 22, 2018
225
164
43
A wonderful +1 for Skyler at CMJ.
This Egyptian beauty is very sensual yet can turn up the heat and excitement at any given moment leaving you spent and breathless!
 

CuddleBuddy2

Sensuality Seeker
May 20, 2018
480
421
63
Another Big +1 for Maddie@CMJ. Always an amazing time with her. Sensual sweetheart who has it all. She's really friendly, passionate, body slides are WOW and massage is amazing. She'll make your day for sure.

She's giving me MA classes but gets an A+ from me ;)
 
Toronto Escorts