Asia Studios Massage
Toronto Escorts

Texas School Speech Pathologist Refused to Sign a Pro-Israel Oath, Now Mandatory in..

Uncharted

Well-known member
Aug 8, 2013
1,025
968
113
For a state that doesn't even believe in needing or issuing residential building permits, because it is considered too communist.
This seems to go against everything Texas stands for.
 

rhuarc29

Well-known member
Apr 15, 2009
9,591
1,194
113
FFS guys, this is a BS (Big Sleazy) article. Pay it no mind and carry on with your day.
 

Big Sleazy

Active member
Sep 13, 2004
3,535
8
38
OK super geniuses. If the website is Leftist ( what does that mean exactly ) and what rhuarc29 say's. Why has a Lawsuit been filed ? If you're going to be a troll. You need to do a better job of covering your tracks. Read the article and answer my question. What does it have to do with being a speech pathologist in Texas ? If you say nothing. Then I agree with you. But if you say something. Then why ? But don't fall back on the BS leftist anti-semite trite.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,773
3
0
It is not an oath to support Israel.

She is a contractor with the State of Texas, not an employee. Therefore she is covered by a Texas law which forbids the state from doing business with companies boycotting Israel. Hence signing the statement that she does not boycott Israel.
 

Grimnul

Well-known member
May 15, 2018
1,482
27
48
It is not an oath to support Israel.

She is a contractor with the State of Texas, not an employee. Therefore she is covered by a Texas law which forbids the state from doing business with companies boycotting Israel. Hence signing the statement that she does not boycott Israel.
Wait, you mean there’s a perfectly reasonable, non-crazy explanation, and stupid people are using this non-story out of context as political ammunition?

I am completely shocked!
 

Charlemagne

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2017
15,451
2,483
113
It is not an oath to support Israel.

She is a contractor with the State of Texas, not an employee. Therefore she is covered by a Texas law which forbids the state from doing business with companies boycotting Israel. Hence signing the statement that she does not boycott Israel.
Sophistry
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
79,760
17,578
113
It is not an oath to support Israel.

She is a contractor with the State of Texas, not an employee. Therefore she is covered by a Texas law which forbids the state from doing business with companies boycotting Israel. Hence signing the statement that she does not boycott Israel.
Its an oath to not call out Israel for human rights abuses, it takes away freedom of speech to defend a foreign country.
Pretty messed up.
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,495
11
38
And as biased on the other side as the Sleazy OP. Particularly stupid is the double-negative "That language would bar Amawi not only from refraining from buying goods from companies located within Israel, but also from any Israeli companies operating in the occupied West Bank (“an Israeli-controlled territory”). As if it was possible to 'prohibit someone from not buying from someone', Or to swear an meaningful oath that you won't not do so.

Aardie quite succinctly summarized the situation, and however unpleasant such clauses and undertakings are, this one imposes no burden on her unless she wishes to choose to deny herself some Israeli product she has selected and wants. If she does want it, she will be breaking her oath if she does buy. If you hold your mouth just right it makes sense.

Otherwise, Loosey-lefty or right-tighty it's ludicrous no matter which way you read it. Us old guys remember when contractors had to affirm they had no truck nor trade with apartheid South Africa, but at least the grammar of that didn't make your brain hurt.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
79,760
17,578
113
And as biased on the other side as the Sleazy OP. Particularly stupid is the double-negative "That language would bar Amawi not only from refraining from buying goods from companies located within Israel, but also from any Israeli companies operating in the occupied West Bank (“an Israeli-controlled territory”). As if it was possible to 'prohibit someone from not buying from someone', Or to swear an meaningful oath that you won't not do so.

Aardie quite succinctly summarized the situation, and however unpleasant such clauses and undertakings are, this one imposes no burden on her unless she wishes to choose to deny herself some Israeli product she has selected and wants. If she does want it, she will be breaking her oath if she does buy. If you hold your mouth just right it makes sense.

Otherwise, Loosey-lefty or right-tighty it's ludicrous no matter which way you read it. Us old guys remember when contractors had to affirm they had no truck nor trade with apartheid South Africa, but at least the grammar of that didn't make your brain hurt.
But this is like legislation demanding that you still do business with apartheid South Africa, regardless of what you think of them.
That's what's really crazy.

And of course the GOP is trying to push through a national law in their last omnibus bill as well, one that does the same thing nationally.
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/...t-roils-democrats-in-year-end-spending-debate

The ACLU has stated its unconstitutional.
https://www.aclu.org/blog/free-spee...srael-anti-boycott-act-still-unconstitutional
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,714
3,410
113
Methinks the shoe is in the other foot.

I think it's unconstitutional as well.

But remember this when discussing what you think is hate speech and it's ilk when it falls under politically correct.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,773
3
0
But this is like legislation demanding that you still do business with apartheid South Africa, regardless of what you think of them.
Is it really?

Or is it just what Old Jones posted, it is merely that you believe that the Sullivan Principals were morally valid and the Texas law is not.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
79,760
17,578
113
Is it really?

Or is it just what Old Jones posted, it is merely that you believe that the Sullivan Principals were morally valid and the Texas law is not.
The legislation says its illegal to boycott Israeli products, that you no longer have the free choice to buy where you want.
As for the apartheid part of the statement, do you really want to go there?
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,773
3
0
The legislation says its illegal to boycott Israeli products, that you no longer have the free choice to buy where you want.
As for the apartheid part of the statement, do you really want to go there?
Boycotting, is not the same as saying I chose to purchase another product. It rather is saying I refuse to purchase a product from the country being boycotted even if they are the only producer of the product.
 

Zaibetter

Banned
Mar 27, 2016
4,284
1
0
It is not an oath to support Israel.

She is a contractor with the State of Texas, not an employee. Therefore she is covered by a Texas law which forbids the state from doing business with companies boycotting Israel. Hence signing the statement that she does not boycott Israel.
Libtards don't get it...
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts