Toronto Escorts

Wisconsin Senate passes limits on incoming Dem governor

Charlemagne

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2017
15,451
2,484
113
December 05, 2018 - 09:11 AM EST

Wisconsin Senate passes limits on incoming Dem governor

BY REID WILSON

Wisconsin’s Republican-led General Assembly on Wednesday passed a handful of measures meant to limit the power of the incoming Democratic governor and attorney general, amid loud protests over what Democrats called a lame-duck power grab.

After an all-night session, the state Senate narrowly passed a handful of bills limiting the power of incoming Gov. Tony Evers (D) and Attorney General-elect Josh Kaul (D) and curtailing early voting. The state Assembly passed the same bills early Wednesday morning.

One measure would allow the state legislature to appoint members of the state Economic Development Corporation, who would then elect their own chairman. Current state law allows the governor to choose the board’s chairman.

Legislators also approved a measure that would allow them to hire their own lawyers to fight challenges to state laws. The incoming attorney general, Kaul, would have to win legislative approval before settling any suits.

And the legislature passed a bill to limit early voting to two weeks before Election Day. Early voting is far more popular in Democratic strongholds like Milwaukee and Madison than in other more rural, more conservative parts of the state.

Republicans cast the measures as a way to protect outgoing Gov. Scott Walker’s (R) legacy, including limits on public employee unions and work requirements for some of those who receive state services.

“Today’s extraordinary session codifies into law reforms that have been eight years in the making,” state Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald (R) said in a statement Wednesday morning. “Law written by the legislature and passed by a governor should not be erased based on the political maneuvering of an incoming administration.”

Democrats, enraged that votes took place in the dead of night, castigated Republicans for taking up measures they said went counter to the wishes voters expressed in November’s midterm elections.

“It’s embarrassing, to some extent, to the state of Wisconsin,” Evers told The Hill in an interview this weekend.

Ostensibly, the extraordinary session was meant to pass a bill that would protect those with pre-existing conditions in case the Affordable Care Act was overturned, a key campaign promise Walker made on the trail this year. That bill failed in the state Senate on a bipartisan vote.

“The Republican-controlled legislature voted to subvert the will of the people,” state Sen. Chris Larson (D) said in a statement. “Never before in Wisconsin’s 170-year history has an extraordinary session been used in such a cold, calculated way in order to usurp the power of duly elected constitutional officers.”

“What the Republicans have done is terribly short-sighted and will leave a permanent stain on their and our state’s legacy,” Larson said.

Dozens of opponents lined up to speak against the bills during a committee hearing on Monday, but legislators approved them on a party-line vote late Monday night.

“The people went to the polls and voted for a new direction in Madison, not a repeat of the Scott Walker dirty tricks playbook,” said Stephanie Bloomingdale, who heads the Wisconsin AFL-CIO. “It’s time to stop the GOP lame-duck special session power grab.”

Walker has signaled he would sign the bills that limit the governor’s powers, authority the legislature granted him when he came to office in 2011.

The last-minute bills are a fitting end to eight years of total Republican control in Wisconsin that illustrated deep divides within a state known for civility in politics.

Walker’s first term was dominated by conservative legislation that rolled back the power of labor unions to bargain collectively on behalf of public employees. Walker became the first governor in American history to survive a recall election, and he won reelection in 2014 by a slim margin.

After eight years in office, few Wisconsinites did not harbor strong feelings either in support of or opposition to Walker’s governorship. His aborted run for president gave some the impression that he had taken his eye off his day job.

In November, Evers ousted Walker by 1.2 percentage points, or 30,000 votes out of about 2.7 million cast.

Evers will be inaugurated on Jan. 7.

Updated at 9:54 a.m.

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/419793-wisconsin-senate-passes-limits-on-incoming-dem-governor
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,558
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Unless they’ve done something counter to the states constitution the legislature has done what it’s suppose to do, make laws.
 

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
10,118
2,765
113
Unless they’ve done something counter to the states constitution the legislature has done what it’s suppose to do, make laws.
PATHETIC.

1) What was "the law" for the Repugs is now 'unlawful' for the incoming Democrat governor, AG, and legislators.

2) Lame duck sore loser Repugs 'undoing' and undermining the votes and will of the electorate.

3) As undemocratic as it can get.

You should be ashamed of yourself.
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,971
6,110
113
Unless they’ve done something counter to the states constitution the legislature has done what it’s suppose to do, make laws.
Perhaps not illegal but clearly intended to thwart the democratic will of the people. You and your GOP friends should be very proud.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,558
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
There may be some Canadian confusion from the Queens subjects here.

In the US we have 3 branches of government, executive (in the case Governor), Legislative and judicial. The legislative branch can pass any law that it can get the executive branch to sign and that passes a legal test (if challanged) by the judicial branch.

I’ve not followed it closely but what I think the WI legislature did was require their ascent to some decisions previously left to the Governor. If anything this is more democratic.
 

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
10,118
2,765
113
I’ve not followed it closely but what I think the WI legislature did was require their ascent to some decisions previously left to the Governor. If anything this is more democratic.
So if as you say this is now "more democratic" when they will now longer be in charge, what form of government were they operating under when they were in charge?

We all know the answer to that.
 

Bud Plug

Sexual Appliance
Aug 17, 2001
5,069
0
0
The Republicans control the state assembly by a wide margin, and actually increased their majority in the state Senate during the mid terms. The only "lame duck" is the current Republican Governor, who lost by a small margin. It seems illogical to be claiming that Republicans are thwarting democracy in passing legislation in these circumstances. It will make more sense to trot out that claim if the incoming Governor acts to thwart the state assembly, given the clear mandate the Republicans have there.
 

shakenbake

Senior Turgid Member
Nov 13, 2003
7,633
1,676
113
Durham Region, Den of Iniquity
www.vafanculo.it
There may be some Canadian confusion from the Queens subjects here.

In the US we have 3 branches of government, executive (in the case Governor), Legislative and judicial. The legislative branch can pass any law that it can get the executive branch to sign and that passes a legal test (if challanged) by the judicial branch.
Unfortunately, many Americans are ignorant of the fact that Canada operates with three branches of government: legislative, executive, and judicial. What a coincidence, it is very similar to the American system!
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,558
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Unfortunately, many Americans are ignorant of the fact that Canada operates with three branches of government: legislative, executive, and judicial. What a coincidence, it is very similar to the American system!
Which makes the ignorant posts above hard to understand.
 

wigglee

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2010
9,833
1,612
113
Which makes the ignorant posts above hard to understand.
If one of those branches ( the legislative) can suddenly pass a bill which neutralizes another branch (the Executive) for partisan political purposes, then the whole democratic system is skewed. Hey, it's just in time for the new Democratic governor to be neutralized! What a coincidence! But of course we know that Repuglicans care not about democracy, but only about grasping power at all costs. That is why they also destroy ballots and gerrymander voting requirements in minority areas.
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,971
6,110
113
If one of those branches ( the legislative) can suddenly pass a bill which neutralizes another branch (the Executive) for partisan political purposes, then the whole democratic system is skewed. Hey, it's just in time for the new Democratic governor to be neutralized! What a coincidence! But of course we know that Repuglicans care not about democracy, but only about grasping power at all costs. That is why they also destroy ballots and gerrymander voting requirements in minority areas.
The only problem is there is no executive branch. Why do you think they call him the Prime Minister.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,558
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
If one of those branches ( the legislative) can suddenly pass a bill which neutralizes another branch (the Executive) for partisan political purposes, then the whole democratic system is skewed. Hey, it's just in time for the new Democratic governor to be neutralized! What a coincidence! But of course we know that Repuglicans care not about democracy, but only about grasping power at all costs. That is why they also destroy ballots and gerrymander voting requirements in minority areas.
Poster child example of an ignorant post on this topic.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,558
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Which makes both you and shakenbake ignorant of the Canadian constitution and government.

No at all, just though the GWN posters needed a grade 5 US civics lesson given the blatant ignorance.
 

shakenbake

Senior Turgid Member
Nov 13, 2003
7,633
1,676
113
Durham Region, Den of Iniquity
www.vafanculo.it
Which makes both you and shakenbake ignorant of the Canadian constitution and government.
I am not ignorant of the Canadian Constitution, as you assume. Who put that idea in your head? If you bothered to read my post correctly, I was pointing out to our American Friend and educating him that we have three branches of government, as does the USA.

The one hope that the WI has is if the judicial branch tells the usurpers to fuck right off and stop the bullshit partisan party politics. What the fuck did you think happened to a great many laws passed by fuckhead Harpo when the Supreme Court of Canada knocked down his asinine and unconstitutional laws?
 
Toronto Escorts