Club Dynasty
Toronto Escorts

TTC in vulnerable position due to alarming lack of funding

Charlemagne

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2017
15,451
2,483
113
TTC in vulnerable position due to alarming lack of funding

Toronto Staff

Nov 20, 2018 9:14 am

While Toronto’s transit system has one of the highest ridership among North American cities, it is also in a vulnerable position and lacks funding, according to a new report.

The report, titled “Mixed Signals,” was released on Tuesday by the non-partisan advocacy group CodeRedTO, and compared Toronto’s transit system with others in Canada and the US to “show us what is realistic in North American context.”

In comparing fares, the TTC’s $3.25 is close to or matching Montreal, Boston, Chicago, and comparable to both Vancouver and Washington DC. But that’s almost where similarities end when it comes to the transit comparisons.

CodeRedTO said that Toronto’s annual adult Metropass is a “significantly more costly monthly pass.” For a pass that is designed to provide a discount for transit users, it criticizes the fact that it would only be available to those with “sufficient disposable income to pre-pay for the pass in expectation of benefiting later.”

The cash fare rate in Toronto also rose above the rate of inflation over the past 20 years. In fact, it rose 29% faster than inflation between 1998 to 2018.



“The most alarming discovery in CodeRedTO’s research has been that while all public transit agencies worldwide contribute to operating expenses via the farebox, the TTC relies on fares for two-thirds of its base operating budget, a level not seen in any other city in North America,” reads the report.

“When combined with inadequate and insecure funding, the vulnerability of the TTC is particularly acute.”

In all comparator cities, the annual operating subsidy covers more than 50% of the operating budget. The report stated that in Boston and Houston, it is more than 70%, and in Los Angeles it is nearly 90%.

Meanwhile in Toronto, that operating subsidy is just 30%.



The report also points out that the per-rider subsidy for the TTC is “dramatically smaller” than what is provided to riders in municipalities in the surrounding GTHA. Markham pays $4.56 per rider, five times more than Toronto’s $0.90.

“The TTC’s operating budget is disproportionately small for its ridership,” said the report, adding that Toronto’s biggest differentiator is the lack of a designated revenue stream for transit, as almost every other city has a dedicated tax providing stable, predictable funding.

“The status quo of low subsidy and unpredictable funding leaves Toronto’s riders at great risk.”

The funding is a requirment to allow Toronto’s transit network to expand for its much-needed growth.

The report indicates that Toronto’s rail network is less complex, and covers less ground than most cities.

“Downtown core streetcar lines improve the network greatly, but at low resilience due to mixed-traffic street design,” said CodeRedTO. “When contrasted with every other city in the study, it is clear Toronto’s heavy reliance on two very long rail lines is unusual.”

Unusual could be an understatement as overcrowding is a regular problem on our subway systems.

Having the highest ridership numbers of all the systems studied in the report, TTC Chair Josh Colle confirmed that what transit needs is funding, especially on the operations side.

The report was presented at City Hall on Tuesday.

http://dailyhive.com/toronto/ttc-code-red-report-lack-funding?fbclid=IwAR2Xn44fykUqrWxvxeAwegFOby_3TkC-K1McXxvxf45gNp78YtnTUsS9hys
 

hedo rick

Active member
Jun 11, 2016
334
70
28
TTC in vulnerable position due to alarming lack of funding

Toronto Staff

Nov 20, 2018 9:14 am

While Toronto’s transit system has one of the highest ridership among North American cities, it is also in a vulnerable position and lacks funding, according to a new report.

The report, titled “Mixed Signals,” was released on Tuesday by the non-partisan advocacy group CodeRedTO, and compared Toronto’s transit system with others in Canada and the US to “show us what is realistic in North American context.”

In comparing fares, the TTC’s $3.25 is close to or matching Montreal, Boston, Chicago, and comparable to both Vancouver and Washington DC. But that’s almost where similarities end when it comes to the transit comparisons.

CodeRedTO said that Toronto’s annual adult Metropass is a “significantly more costly monthly pass.” For a pass that is designed to provide a discount for transit users, it criticizes the fact that it would only be available to those with “sufficient disposable income to pre-pay for the pass in expectation of benefiting later.”

The cash fare rate in Toronto also rose above the rate of inflation over the past 20 years. In fact, it rose 29% faster than inflation between 1998 to 2018.



“The most alarming discovery in CodeRedTO’s research has been that while all public transit agencies worldwide contribute to operating expenses via the farebox, the TTC relies on fares for two-thirds of its base operating budget, a level not seen in any other city in North America,” reads the report.

“When combined with inadequate and insecure funding, the vulnerability of the TTC is particularly acute.”

In all comparator cities, the annual operating subsidy covers more than 50% of the operating budget. The report stated that in Boston and Houston, it is more than 70%, and in Los Angeles it is nearly 90%.

Meanwhile in Toronto, that operating subsidy is just 30%.



The report also points out that the per-rider subsidy for the TTC is “dramatically smaller” than what is provided to riders in municipalities in the surrounding GTHA. Markham pays $4.56 per rider, five times more than Toronto’s $0.90.

“The TTC’s operating budget is disproportionately small for its ridership,” said the report, adding that Toronto’s biggest differentiator is the lack of a designated revenue stream for transit, as almost every other city has a dedicated tax providing stable, predictable funding.

“The status quo of low subsidy and unpredictable funding leaves Toronto’s riders at great risk.”

The funding is a requirment to allow Toronto’s transit network to expand for its much-needed growth.

The report indicates that Toronto’s rail network is less complex, and covers less ground than most cities.

“Downtown core streetcar lines improve the network greatly, but at low resilience due to mixed-traffic street design,” said CodeRedTO. “When contrasted with every other city in the study, it is clear Toronto’s heavy reliance on two very long rail lines is unusual.”

Unusual could be an understatement as overcrowding is a regular problem on our subway systems.

Having the highest ridership numbers of all the systems studied in the report, TTC Chair Josh Colle confirmed that what transit needs is funding, especially on the operations side.

The report was presented at City Hall on Tuesday.

http://dailyhive.com/toronto/ttc-code-red-report-lack-funding?fbclid=IwAR2Xn44fykUqrWxvxeAwegFOby_3TkC-K1McXxvxf45gNp78YtnTUsS9hys
"lack of a designated revenue stream for transit, as almost every other city has a dedicated tax providing stable, predictable funding"
Wasn't that what the gas tax was for?

"TTC relies on fares for two-thirds of its base operating budget"
Should be 100%. TTC users should pay for what they use.
As a driver, I pay a license plate tax, driver's license tax, and a gas tax over and above the costs of owning and operating my own vehicle. And transit users don't even pay the operating costs?
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,812
3,468
113
"lack of a designated revenue stream for transit, as almost every other city has a dedicated tax providing stable, predictable funding"
Wasn't that what the gas tax was for?

"TTC relies on fares for two-thirds of its base operating budget"
Should be 100%. TTC users should pay for what they use.
As a driver, I pay a license plate tax, driver's license tax, and a gas tax over and above the costs of owning and operating my own vehicle. And transit users don't even pay the operating costs?
If you want all those low pay workers to get to to work to get your morning coffee I would suggest it's cheaper than having to pay them alot more to be able to.
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
26,206
6,474
113
Room 112
It's a poorly run entity, they need new leadership
They just hired a new guy as CEO. Before that it was run by Andy Byford who is an extremely competent leader. He was hired by NYC. That's not the problem. The problem was lack of vision over a number of years. Not investing in enough track space and too much reliance on buses.
 

azeri99

Banned
Sep 19, 2018
949
1
0
They just hired a new guy as CEO. Before that it was run by Andy Byford who is an extremely competent leader. He was hired by NYC. That's not the problem. The problem was lack of vision over a number of years. Not investing in enough track space and too much reliance on buses.
Well isn't leadership to blame for a lack of vision and investment? , isn't that the job of a CEO?
 
Last edited:

explorerzip

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2006
8,109
1,306
113
"lack of a designated revenue stream for transit, as almost every other city has a dedicated tax providing stable, predictable funding"
Wasn't that what the gas tax was for?

"TTC relies on fares for two-thirds of its base operating budget"
Should be 100%. TTC users should pay for what they use.
As a driver, I pay a license plate tax, driver's license tax, and a gas tax over and above the costs of owning and operating my own vehicle. And transit users don't even pay the operating costs?
Nobody truly be they drivers or transit users pay for 100% of what they use. We all subsidize roads and highways through taxes in some way shape or form. Just because someone chooses to ride transit doesn't mean they contribute less.

AFAIK, gas taxes going towards transit is a relatively new development. Toronto had to fit the bill largely on its own ever since amalgamation. Those political decisions are the root cause of why TTC, GO, and other systems are so behind other cities. The reason we have a subway extension has more to do with the Liberal MP at the time Greg Sorbara campaigning hard for it because it would end in his riding. The TTC was forced to build it into Sorbara's.

The same thing with the Scarborough RT where the city was basically forced to the Scarborough RT vehicles that were state of the art at the time, but incompatible with all other vehicles in the TTC fleet.

Every time the government supports these vanity projects, we slip further and further behind. Since the city never really invested in transit for decades, it's always going to be behind no matter how much of the gas or other taxes it gets.
 

explorerzip

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2006
8,109
1,306
113
Well isn't leadership to blame for a lack of vision and investment? , isn't that the job of a CEO?
Only if said CEO can run the system without interference from the city, provincial and federal governments. So long as they can put their own political careers ahead of what is good for the people, a CEO has no power.
 

NotADcotor

His most imperial galactic atheistic majesty.
Mar 8, 2017
5,962
3,981
113
I drive past Toronto a few times a year and every time westbound on the 401 the traffic leading onto the Don Valley Parkinglot is worse and worse

Used to be I'd go down the DVP as I like driving through the downtown core but now traffic is backed up onto the 401.

I went downtown for shits and giggles at midnight on Saturday and there was a huge clusterfuck heading south on Spandina heading back to the Gardner.

It's getting insane, no real space for roads, but something must be done. It's getting to the point where I'd consider doing trips to Africa again and well last time...


Still better than Toronto traffic.
 

explorerzip

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2006
8,109
1,306
113
It's getting insane, no real space for roads, but something must be done.
No matter what the city tries to do like raise taxes, tolls, streetcar rights of way, etc. someone complains. If we really want to do something about this problem, then we're going to start paying for it through user fees, taxes, congestion charges, etc and get on with improving transit and the road network.

So long as people choose to live out far outside the city (I know that it's because of housing costs), we'll never reduce this problem.
 

saxon

Well-known member
Dec 2, 2009
4,751
511
113
Doesn’t help when you’ve got fare collectors making over $100,000 a year.
 
Toronto Escorts