Steeles Royal
Toronto Escorts

Resolution to do away with gender identity moves forward at Tory convention

Charlemagne

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2017
15,451
2,484
113
Resolution to do away with gender identity moves forward at Tory convention

BY SHAWN JEFFORDS, THE CANADIAN PRESS
POSTED NOV 17, 2018 11:53 AM ESTLAST UPDATED NOV 17, 2018 AT 2:58 PM EST

A resolution calling for the removal of gender identity from Ontario schools was approved for further discussion at the Ontario PC Convention on Saturday.

Policy Resolution R4, which was proposed by failed leadership candidate Tanya Granic Allen, says “gender identity theory” is a “highly controversial, unscientific ‘liberal ideology'” and calls on the Ford government to remove the teaching and promotion of it in schools.

Several other resolutions that were approved on day two of the weekend convention included one to support legislation which would give parents ample notice as to when sex-ed lessons would be taught in schools and offer them the choice to “opt-out.”

Party officials were quick to point out that the resolutions were not binding and will not form any part of party policy until they are formally voted on at the next policy convention.

The move drew swift rebuke from the opposition NDP with Toronto-Centre MPP and Housing and Women’s Issues critic Suze Morrison calling it “an affront to the Human Rights Code.”

“Days away from the Trans Day of Remembrance & Ontario PCs have shown us where they really stand on human rights, once again,” she tweeted. “Trans rights are human rights. Gender is no binary.”

The convention delegates also voted to reject auto insurance reforms which would have made it more affordable while maintaining the level of benefits.

Heading into the convention, prominent social conservatives expressed concerns that their voices were being ignored, once again exposing cracks in a coalition that helped propel the party to a massive election win earlier this year.

Jack Fonseca of the social conservative group Campaign Life Coalition and Granic Allen, a parental rights advocate and former Tory leadership candidate, have both expressed frustration that dozens of policy resolutions with a social conservative bent were blocked from being debated by party members at the event in Etobicoke, Ont.

The exclusion of the proposals has rekindled fears amongst some social conservatives that their voices will once again be marginalized, as they said the party had done under former Tory leader Patrick Brown.

“Our take on this is that liberal-progressive elements within the party establishment that are corrupt and against democratic rights of party members have filtered out policy resolutions that were submitted by grassroots members,” Fonseca said, alleging party officials have “rigged” the debate.

Fonseca said the rejected proposals, which run the gamut from denouncing the Liberal sex-education curriculum to protecting so-called conscience rights for physicians, are in some cases actual policies that Premier Doug Ford’s government is currently taking action on.

Fonseca points to one resolution that would affirm support for requiring parental consent in order to grant a minor an abortion. Ford made headlines during his run for the Tory leadership by supporting the idea, at the time expressing his incredulity over other politicians’ fear of addressing the issue.

Fonseca said that resolution won’t be debated this weekend.

“Doug Ford said during the (leadership) campaign that he supported that kind of legislation,” he said. “He ran on that. It helped him.”

Fonesca said Ford himself should intervene and ensure social conservatives have a voice during the policy debate. If the premier doesn’t, he risks damaging the coalition that helped him win the spring vote, Fonseca said.

“It will be seen by social conservatives as a betrayal by the party,” he said. “I seriously believe it would put at risk a second-term majority government for the Ford PCs.”

Granic Allen said a number of policy resolutions she submitted for debate were also rejected by the party.

“The majority of what one would describe as social conservative (policies) … just simply didn’t make it,” she said. “You’ll have to quiz the party as to why. But of course, we’re very sensitive because we’ve seen something similar a year ago when we saw these policies shuffled away at the Patrick Brown convention.”

Granic Allen has had a tumultuous year within the party. After her bid to lead the Tories fell short, she was the only contestant who stood beside Doug Ford the night results of the vote were revealed.

Months later, Ford removed her as a candidate for the party in the spring election after controversial social media messages she posted were made public. Granic Allen said she hasn’t spoken to Ford since then.

But she said many in the party hoped it had turned the page on the internal tensions that existed during Brown’s tenure as leader.

Ontario Infrastructure Minister Monte McNaughton, who has been a voice for social conservatives in the past, said Ford has worked hard to unite the party.

“I think when you look back in history, whether it was Mike Harris, Stephen Harper, Doug Ford, the most successful conservative leaders in our time have been successful in bringing that coalition together,” he said. “Premier Ford, I think, has done a great job as someone who is a fiscal conservative who stands up for families.”

Ford’s office did not respond to a request for comment.

Western University political science professor Cristine de Clercy said every political party is a coalition of different factions, so the Tories’ internal struggles are no surprise. But this weekend’s policy convention will be Ford’s first challenge when it comes to reinforcing unity.

“It’s time to pay the piper,” said de Clercy. “Mr. Ford has the difficult task of allocating a still relatively small basket of resources to quite a large demand for reward.”

Wilfrid Laurier political science professor Barry Kay said the divide between social conservatives and progressives in Ontario’s Tories is a “natural cleavage point.” Many previous Tory leaders, including former prime minister Stephen Harper, have pushed social conservatives to the side in a bid to win more mainstream supporters.

“Those are losing positions,” he said of many social conservative core issues. “Harper made a calculation in federal politics that winning was more important than being a purist on social conservative issues.”

Kay said every conservative leader, including Ford, has the advantage of knowing social conservatives won’t park their votes with other parties, even if they are ignored.

“My hunch is that the central PC party people…are just telling him (Ford) to smile at them and try to cajole them a bit _ but don’t take them too seriously.”

https://toronto.citynews.ca/2018/11/17/resolution-to-do-away-with-gender-identity-moves-forward-at-tory-convention/
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,469
5,655
113
Ford will take Ontario back to the Dark Ages. Maybe he may also want to legalize street drug dealers, as they meet his criteria!!
 

Bud Plug

Sexual Appliance
Aug 17, 2001
5,069
0
0
Well, there goes the gender fluid vote. What's that, about 0.0001 percent of voters?

I think it's a far smaller percentage of the electorate than those who think that public schools need not require students to be engaged in debating every sociological issue.
 

Big Sleazy

Active member
Sep 13, 2004
3,535
8
38
Finally someone with some common sense. Now can we move along and get to solving the destruction of the Ontario economy over the last 30 years.
 

essguy_

Active member
Nov 1, 2001
4,432
16
38
This is very simple: It's Ford paying back the people who backed his leadership bid after scuttling Brown. The party is still deeply divided and Ford needs to shore up support amongst the people who backed him or else he will be history before his term is up. In that sense, Ford is being smarter than Brown - who was so clueless about his own appeal that he thought he could stab the social conservative wing of the party in the back and ride a wave of "red-Tory" support. The actual result was that Brown had NO support from either faction because nobody trusted him.

This resolution is just one more way for Ford to say "Thanks" and make sure that he doesn't have a target on his back.

This is just more in-party bullshit being played out in public. The party is still a complete shitshow and governing for the good of the Province is the least of their priorities.
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,495
11
38
If they do away with "gender identity", That means no more boys, girls, men or women, and questions about which of them you claim you are. Only acceptable standard would be indisputable biology: 'Do you have a penis, or a vagina? Check only one of the boxes marked V or P.'

Of course, with the new sex-ed curriculum kids wouldn't understand the question or know how to answer answer until they were in at least Grade 2.

Perhaps Dougie's wee friends would be happier if we put them all in unisex dresses until then as we did a century ago?
 

Bud Plug

Sexual Appliance
Aug 17, 2001
5,069
0
0
If they do away with "gender identity", That means no more boys, girls, men or women, and questions about which of them you claim you are. Only acceptable standard would be indisputable biology: 'Do you have a penis, or a vagina? Check only one of the boxes marked V or P.'

Of course, with the new sex-ed curriculum kids wouldn't understand the question or know how to answer answer until they were in at least Grade 2.

Perhaps Dougie's wee friends would be happier if we put them all in unisex dresses until then as we did a century ago?
How did boys and girls ever figure out their genders before the public school system? It's a wonder how the human race survived! LOL!
 

Moviefan-2

Court Jester
Oct 17, 2011
10,489
170
63
This is a total nothing burger. As Ford and others have made clear, it's not party policy. It's not government policy. It's not even a policy endorsed by delegates at the PC convention.

https://www.thestar.com/news/queens...it-be-removed-from-the-health-curriculum.html

It was apparently a motion that came from the floor on Saturday morning. If I were to guess, I suspect crazy Tania slipped it in when there was almost nobody in whatever room this was being discussed.

The party may need to examine how motions are raised at its convention, but it's clearly not any cause for concern as far as government policy goes.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,156
2,605
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_95987


At least 6,500 genes are expressed at different levels in male or female body tissues, finds a new study.

'The basic genome is nearly the same in all of us, but it is utilized differently across the body and among individuals,' said Dr Moran Gershoni, who carried out the study, published in BMC Biology, with Professor Shmuel Pietrokovski at the Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel.

Using data from the GTEx project – a large study of human gene expression in different organs and body tissues from nearly 550 adult donors – the researchers investigated the expression levels of 20,000 different genes, and sorted their findings by sex and tissue.

Of the genes they studied, close to 6500 had an expression level that was biased towards one sex or the other in at least one tissue type. For example, genes related to hair growth were expressed more highly in men's skin cells than women's, while genes related to fat storage were expressed more highly in women.

Interestingly, they found that genes with a higher sex-specific expression bias accumulated mutations at a much higher rate than genes with a similar expression level between the sexes.

'The more a gene was specific to one sex, the less selection we saw on the gene,' said Dr Gershoni.

Differential gene expression between the sexes could explain why certain mutations can persist in the population, and the authors speculate that this could help researchers understand why rates of infertility between couples are so high. For example, women can pass on mutations that might be highly detrimental to male fertility, as they do not hinder female reproduction.

'Paradoxically, sex-linked genes are those in which harmful mutations are more likely to be passed down, including those that impair fertility,' said Professor Pietrokovski.

Their findings also identified potential differences in disease onset and response to drug treatment between the sexes. It is hoped that these findings could aid disease research and treatment in the future.

Notably, the expression of one gene, called NPPB, was found to decline in women with age, which the researchers suggest might play a role in the increased risk of heart disease found in post-menopausal women.

They also found that genes for certain enzymes in the liver, which are known to regulate drug metabolism, were expressed more highly in women than men. This provides a degree of evidence for the differences observed in drug processing between men and women, they suggest.

'The study also emphasizes the need for a better understanding of the differences between men and women in the genes that cause disease or respond to treatments,' said Professor Pietrokovski.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts