Oh, my bad, thought they were mostly North American.What did you get in geography class, Frankie??
That makes my case even better, though.
120,000 scientists from 91 countries back my claims.
And you got big sleazy and Kirk.
Go Phil, go.
Oh, my bad, thought they were mostly North American.What did you get in geography class, Frankie??
http://whatweknow.aaas.org/So in your warped sense of logic because any scientist pays a membership to the AAAS they automatically believe in AGW. You just summed up the lunacy of the left in a nutshell. Congratulations.
120,000 divided by 91 = 1,300 or so per country.Oh, my bad, thought they were mostly North American.
That makes my case even better, though.
120,000 scientists from 91 countries back my claims
Nice math there, really showcases your intellect and understanding, Phil.120,000 divided by 91 = 1,300 or so per country.
North-America consist of 3 countries (Canada, US and Mexico) you are now down to 439 scientists per country, which isnt very much when you think about it, but thinking was never your strong point, eh Frankie??
https://www.nas.org/articles/Estimated_40_Percent_of_Scientists_Doubt_Manmade_Global_Warminghttp://whatweknow.aaas.org/
Its right there.
AAAS represents 120,000 scientists from 91 countries and they back that statement.
Whatcha got on your team to counter that one?
Phil?
:rofl:
Fred Singer is a kook.https://www.nas.org/articles/Estimated_40_Percent_of_Scientists_Doubt_Manmade_Global_Warming
Estimated 40 Percent of Scientists Doubt Manmade Global Warming
PRINCETON, NJ (January 3, 2011)—S. Fred Singer said in an interview with the National Association of Scholars (NAS) that “the number of skeptical qualified scientists has been growing steadily; I would guess it is about 40%
Shall we check the score?would guess it is about 40% now.”
you have no business calling anybody a kook and all your climate alarmist sources are funded by the Nazi-collaborating traitors and eugenicist promoting Rockefeller family through their foundationFred Singer is a kook.
This is what he said:
Shall we check the score?
Backing the IPCC findings on climate change - 120,000
On the science denier side - 5
(pornaddict, bigsleazy, phil, kirk and now Fred Singer and his 'guess')
You guys are losing.
Kook.you have no business calling anybody a kook and all your climate alarmist sources are funded by the Nazi-collaborating traitors and eugenicist promoting Rockefeller family through their foundation
Are you gonna stick by your claim that 120,000 AAAS North-American scientists subscribe to global warming???Nice math there, really showcases your intellect and understanding, Phil.
You gonna stand by those numbers and that claim?
You wanna base the merit of your whole argument on this claim?
That would be very fun
The 120,000 members, from 91 countries, of AAAS have posted in support of the IPCC's findings.Are you gonna stick by your claim that 120,000 AAAS North-American scientists subscribe to global warming???
You answer first, honey bun
But you wrote 120,000 NORTH-AMERICAN scientists, cupcake.The 120,000 members, from 91 countries, of AAAS have posted in support of the IPCC's findings
Pornaddict.http://whatweknow.aaas.org/
Its right there.
AAAS represents 120,000 scientists from 91 countries and they back that statement.
Whatcha got on your team to counter that one?
Phil?
:rofl:
To assume that the U.S. has the same number of scientists as, for example, Iceland gets your analysis off to a lousy start. I won't mention the other errors.120,000 divided by 91 = 1,300 or so per country.
North-America consist of 3 countries (Canada, US and Mexico) you are now down to 439 scientists per country, which isnt very much when you think about it, but thinking was never your strong point, eh Frankie??
Why don't you Google search on the Rockefeller foundation promoting eugenics in nazo Germany?Kook.
Tell us please, what does per capita mean??To assume that the U.S. has the same number of scientists as, for example, Iceland gets your analysis off to a lousy start. I won't mention the other errors
I need to ask, have you suffered a catastrophic brain injury in the past?http://whatweknow.aaas.org/
Its right there.
AAAS represents 120,000 scientists from 91 countries and they back that statement.
Whatcha got on your team to counter that one?
Phil?
:rofl:
(sarcasm on)Why don't you Google search on the Rockefeller foundation promoting eugenics in nazo Germany?
The AAAS represents the views of their membership.I need to ask, have you suffered a catastrophic brain injury in the past?
120,000 scientists/students pay a membership to belong to the AAAS. That doesn't mean that they back this statement.
Failing the difference between weather and climate yet again, Phil?Its -20 Celsius outside, but thats what global warming does, it makes our winters get colder