Toronto Escorts

Migrant Caravan Tears Down Border Fence, Storms Mexico

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
6,829
2,838
113
I always thought the CBC was sacrosanct and all that it prints is gospel to its liberal acolytes. Is that why Bill Blair had to retract his comment about how many migrants were sent back?
You were wrong. Just admit it.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,447
1,331
113
The US has been fucking Latin america too long including Honduras. This group of desperate and poor people are 100% MADE IN THE USA. They are just coming home to roost.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,815
3,470
113
Interesting timing.

I bet they reach the border the weekend before the elections. What a pleasant coincidence.........
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
70,650
69,686
113
Admit what? That anyone that crosses into Canada has a free ride so long as Trudeau and his merry band of incompetents are in charge? Look, not even the minister responsible has a clue what’s going on, he just regurgitates whatever Trudeau says.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/pol...-out-of-900-asylum-seekers-already-facing-us/

You're a tedious pest - mainly because these issues have been debated to death on this board and you don't bother to read them and rant about all the same fake news crap that the other righties don't try to pull any more.

Here's the Cliff's Notes version: - EVERY CANADIAN ADMINISTRATION SINCE DIEFENBAKER HAS SIGNED OFF ON THE UN CHARTER ON REFUGEES.

THE CHARTER GUARANTEES THAT CLAIMANTS GET BASIC ROOM AND BOARD AND THEIR CLAIMS IMPARTIALLY ADJUDICATED. IF THE CLAIMANT IS SUCCESSFUL, HE/ SHE GETS TO STAY.

ALL WESTERN COUNTRIES SIGNED OFF ON THE SAME AGREEMENT AT THE SAME TIME - THE USA, THE UK, AUSTRALIA, FRANCE, GERMANY, ETC. THEY ALL ALLOW REFUGEE CLAIMANTS TO ENTER AND HAVE THEIR CLAIMS HEARD.

NONE OF THOSE COUNTRIES HAS RENEGED ON THE DEAL. SO CANADA WON'T EITHER. YOU CAN ELECT 50 ANDREW SCHEERS AND YOU'LL STILL HAVE THE REFUGEES. (IT'S JUST THAT THE SUN WON'T WRITE ABOUT IT ANY MORE, BECAUSE THEY SUCK TORY DICK).

THIS HELP YOU, ORION? IF NOT, GO LOOK THIS STUFF UP ON WIKIPEDIA AND STOP ANNOYING THE FOLKS WHO ACTUALLY KNOW WHAT THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT.
 

Zaibetter

Banned
Mar 27, 2016
4,284
1
0

You're a tedious pest - mainly because these issues have been debated to death on this board and you don't bother to read them and rant about all the same fake news crap that the other righties don't try to pull any more.

Here's the Cliff's Notes version: - EVERY CANADIAN ADMINISTRATION SINCE DIEFENBAKER HAS SIGNED OFF ON THE UN CHARTER ON REFUGEES.

THE CHARTER GUARANTEES THAT CLAIMANTS GET BASIC ROOM AND BOARD AND THEIR CLAIMS IMPARTIALLY ADJUDICATED. IF THE CLAIMANT IS SUCCESSFUL, HE/ SHE GETS TO STAY.

ALL WESTERN COUNTRIES SIGNED OFF ON THE SAME AGREEMENT AT THE SAME TIME - THE USA, THE UK, AUSTRALIA, FRANCE, GERMANY, ETC. THEY ALL ALLOW REFUGEE CLAIMANTS TO ENTER AND HAVE THEIR CLAIMS HEARD.

NONE OF THOSE COUNTRIES HAS RENEGED ON THE DEAL. SO CANADA WON'T EITHER. YOU CAN ELECT 50 ANDREW SCHEERS AND YOU'LL STILL HAVE THE REFUGEES. (IT'S JUST THAT THE SUN WON'T WRITE ABOUT IT ANY MORE, BECAUSE THEY SUCK TORY DICK).

THIS HELP YOU, ORION? IF NOT, GO LOOK THIS STUFF UP ON WIKIPEDIA AND STOP ANNOYING THE FOLKS WHO ACTUALLY KNOW WHAT THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT.
MY ...MY... look at oagre shouting you're not going to win an argument by shouting and insulting people all the time...
 

apoptygma

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2017
3,043
100
48
MY ...MY... look at oagre shouting you're not going to win an argument by shouting and insulting people all the time...
Technically, there was no argument, because oagre's opponent didn't have a platform... but for the sake of simplicity, oagre 'won' the 'argument' many posts ago. I suppose the most recent post was just a victory lap.
 

Zaibetter

Banned
Mar 27, 2016
4,284
1
0
Technically, there was no argument, because oagre's opponent didn't have a platform... but for the sake of simplicity, oagre 'won' the 'argument' many posts ago. I suppose the most recent post was just a victory lap.
Sorry, but once you become abusive and start shouting ..you're an automatic loser. Lacks luster.
Another Clown tried that with me the other day, I cut him off right away.
 

apoptygma

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2017
3,043
100
48
Sorry, but once you become abusive and start shouting ..you're an automatic loser. Lacks luster.
Another Clown tried that with me the other day, I cut him off right away.
We are all proud of you for that impressive display of integrity.
The facts remain: A 'yelling' oagre has run logical circles around the willfully blind, which includes you.
 

Zaibetter

Banned
Mar 27, 2016
4,284
1
0
We are all proud of you for that impressive display of integrity.
The facts remain: A 'yelling' oagre has run logical circles around the willfully blind, which includes you.
Who's "We"? You and the committee? LOL

Still..no excuses its rude.. its acknowledged everywhere to be inappropriate and low class and against the rules.
 

Orion1027

Member
Jan 10, 2017
482
3
18

You're a tedious pest - mainly because these issues have been debated to death on this board and you don't bother to read them and rant about all the same fake news crap that the other righties don't try to pull any more.

Here's the Cliff's Notes version: - EVERY CANADIAN ADMINISTRATION SINCE DIEFENBAKER HAS SIGNED OFF ON THE UN CHARTER ON REFUGEES.

THE CHARTER GUARANTEES THAT CLAIMANTS GET BASIC ROOM AND BOARD AND THEIR CLAIMS IMPARTIALLY ADJUDICATED. IF THE CLAIMANT IS SUCCESSFUL, HE/ SHE GETS TO STAY.

ALL WESTERN COUNTRIES SIGNED OFF ON THE SAME AGREEMENT AT THE SAME TIME - THE USA, THE UK, AUSTRALIA, FRANCE, GERMANY, ETC. THEY ALL ALLOW REFUGEE CLAIMANTS TO ENTER AND HAVE THEIR CLAIMS HEARD.

NONE OF THOSE COUNTRIES HAS RENEGED ON THE DEAL. SO CANADA WON'T EITHER. YOU CAN ELECT 50 ANDREW SCHEERS AND YOU'LL STILL HAVE THE REFUGEES. (IT'S JUST THAT THE SUN WON'T WRITE ABOUT IT ANY MORE, BECAUSE THEY SUCK TORY DICK).

THIS HELP YOU, ORION? IF NOT, GO LOOK THIS STUFF UP ON WIKIPEDIA AND STOP ANNOYING THE FOLKS WHO ACTUALLY KNOW WHAT THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT.
I know how to read, I did manage to earn both an LLB & MBA......tell me something how are of these people are truly refugees, there is a process that they must go through in order to be recognized as such. Simply crossing the boarder because some dipshit of a PM wanted to one up the POTUS doesn’t make them refugees.

These are the LEGAL STEPS;

1. Decide where to apply. There are two ways to apply for refugee status in Canada: Apply at a port of entry. ...
Get the application package.
2. To apply, you need to give us information about: your background. ...
Go to a hearing.
3.If you are eligible to make a refugee claim, you will have to go to a hearing at the IRB.

Walking across a farm field in North Dakota into Manitoba or crossing through a ravine in Quebec is not considered a recognized point on entry.
 

Orion1027

Member
Jan 10, 2017
482
3
18

You're a tedious pest - mainly because these issues have been debated to death on this board and you don't bother to read them and rant about all the same fake news crap that the other righties don't try to pull any more.

Here's the Cliff's Notes version: - EVERY CANADIAN ADMINISTRATION SINCE DIEFENBAKER HAS SIGNED OFF ON THE UN CHARTER ON REFUGEES.

THE CHARTER GUARANTEES THAT CLAIMANTS GET BASIC ROOM AND BOARD AND THEIR CLAIMS IMPARTIALLY ADJUDICATED. IF THE CLAIMANT IS SUCCESSFUL, HE/ SHE GETS TO STAY.

ALL WESTERN COUNTRIES SIGNED OFF ON THE SAME AGREEMENT AT THE SAME TIME - THE USA, THE UK, AUSTRALIA, FRANCE, GERMANY, ETC. THEY ALL ALLOW REFUGEE CLAIMANTS TO ENTER AND HAVE THEIR CLAIMS HEARD.

NONE OF THOSE COUNTRIES HAS RENEGED ON THE DEAL. SO CANADA WON'T EITHER. YOU CAN ELECT 50 ANDREW SCHEERS AND YOU'LL STILL HAVE THE REFUGEES. (IT'S JUST THAT THE SUN WON'T WRITE ABOUT IT ANY MORE, BECAUSE THEY SUCK TORY DICK).

THIS HELP YOU, ORION? IF NOT, GO LOOK THIS STUFF UP ON WIKIPEDIA AND STOP ANNOYING THE FOLKS WHO ACTUALLY KNOW WHAT THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT.
I know how to read, I did manage to earn both an LLB & MBA......tell me something how are of these people are truly refugees, there is a process that they must go through in order to be recognized as such. Simply crossing the boarder because some dipshit of a PM wanted to one up the POTUS doesn’t make them refugees.

These are the LEGAL STEPS;


1. Decide where to apply. There are two ways to apply for refugee status in Canada: Apply at a port of entry. ...
Get the application package.
2. To apply, you need to give us information about: your background. ...
Go to a hearing.
3.If you are eligible to make a refugee claim, you will have to go to a hearing at the IRB.

Walking across a farm field in North Dakota into Manitoba or crossing through a ravine in Quebec is not considered a recognized point on entry.
 

Conil

Well-known member
Apr 12, 2013
3,435
558
113
Mexicans in US cities also waved Mexican flags while protesting US immigration policies, not very smart.

 

wigglee

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2010
9,833
1,612
113
If the caravan did not exist Trump would need to create it.
Hey, he pays supporters at his rallies.... and these Spanish speakers work cheap! Just in time to create a crisis that will enable the Repugs to win the upcoming midterms...BINGO! This is too brilliant for Drumpf.... must have been Putin's brainchild.
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
70,650
69,686
113
I know how to read, I did manage to earn both an LLB & MBA......tell me something how are of these people are truly refugees, there is a process that they must go through in order to be recognized as such. Simply crossing the boarder because some dipshit of a PM wanted to one up the POTUS doesn’t make them refugees.

These are the LEGAL STEPS;


1. Decide where to apply. There are two ways to apply for refugee status in Canada: Apply at a port of entry. ...
Get the application package.
2. To apply, you need to give us information about: your background. ...
Go to a hearing.
3.If you are eligible to make a refugee claim, you will have to go to a hearing at the IRB.

Walking across a farm field in North Dakota into Manitoba or crossing through a ravine in Quebec is not considered a recognized point on entry.

Huh? Is this a question? Are you trying to make a point?

And frankly, you don't strike me as a highly qualified guy. If you had the qualifications you suggest, you wouldn't need to ask these questions. I don't practice immigration law, but this stuff is common knowledge.
 

Orion1027

Member
Jan 10, 2017
482
3
18

Huh? Is this a question? Are you trying to make a point?

And frankly, you don't strike me as a highly qualified guy. If you had the qualifications you suggest, you wouldn't need to ask these questions. I don't practice immigration law, but this stuff is common knowledge.
I’m not an immigration lawyer either, but I’m quite certain that Roxham road isn’t a recognized point of entry yet Trudeau and his merry band of misfits are allowing these “refugees” in from the US. And as Bill Blair has admitted, hardly any of them have been deported. BTW, how does someone who’s been living in the US for 4-5 years qualify as a refugee as many of these people crossing over in Quebec and Manitoba? You can candy coat it and spin it any way you want but you and Mr. Dressup will find yourself on the wrong side of history. Take a good look at what’s happening in Europe and the backlash there. Enjoy
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
25,280
3,642
113
Why not hire the entire caravan to build Trump's wall??

The illegals have work for the next several years, and Trump gets cheap labour. Its win/win
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
70,650
69,686
113
I’m not an immigration lawyer either, but I’m quite certain that Roxham road isn’t a recognized point of entry yet Trudeau and his merry band of misfits are allowing these “refugees” in from the US. And as Bill Blair has admitted, hardly any of them have been deported. BTW, how does someone who’s been living in the US for 4-5 years qualify as a refugee as many of these people crossing over in Quebec and Manitoba? You can candy coat it and spin it any way you want but you and Mr. Dressup will find yourself on the wrong side of history. Take a good look at what’s happening in Europe and the backlash there. Enjoy

You certainly are not an immigration lawyer. So listen up good and cut the attitude.

If anyone reaches Canadian soil and claims refugee status, he can make a refugee claim and the Canadian government has to give him a hearing. That's what the UN Convention says and that's what Canadian governments have done since the 1950's. All other Western countries do it too. Because they are all signatories to the UN Convention.

If you were really a lawyer, you would know that the Harper administration played exactly the same rules. So did the Chretien government, the Mulroney government, the Daddy Trudeau government, etc back in time.

People who lived in the US, but who don't have permanent status there can make a refugee claim under the Convention when they reach Canada, unless they are precluded from doing so by a bilateral treaty between the US and Canada. There is such a treaty, but it is incomplete. It is worded so ineptly - by Harper and his idiots! - that it is only triggered if the claimant reports at a border point. If the claimant wanders into Canada through the woods or over the prairies, the treaty does not apply. Thank the Tories for that one!

So Mr Dressup and I are only telling you what the law mandates Canada does. Whether that is the wrong side of history (as you pretentiously tell us) or not.

And let me add that the # of refugees hitting Canada is but a small fraction of the # hitting Europe. So I think we're all safely on the "right side of history".

Now if you were really a lawyer, you'd know all this stuff without me writing it out for you.
 
Toronto Escorts