You don't use the word Islam in most of your criticisms.
Which shows that according to your definition, you're attacking the people.
CSIS sees ‘significant’ jump in far-right activity online
- Thread starter Charlemagne
- Start date
Which shows that according to your definition, you're attacking the people.
Look up above you will see I did and do. I consider Islam to be a fascist governing system complete with Big Brother symbol. And uses religion both as a recruitment tool and control method.
In essence it's one of the world's biggest cults. What would have happened a 1000 years from now if Charlie Manson or David Koresh had lived and flourished.
I don't blame most of the people, they are brainwashed and forced into it.
Like I said. Major source is Facebook. What's this one North99?
Such an activist you are! Don't forget to retweet as well!
Go look up North99. I've posted their stuff here before, the most notable one is where they corrected The Fraser Institute's claim about taxes. This is terb, if I wanted to be an activist I wouldn't bother with a bunch of old right wingers.
I have before. They are rated a left wing activist group who don't list their donors.
They are not a news source.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/north99/
They are funded through individual donations and provide credible sources for their claims.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/north99/
OMG, Soros could have donated money and tainted the whole organization!
Really, you're starting to sound some kind of kooky anti-semitic conspiracy theory clown with this type of talk.
Smarten up and just admit that right wing extremists are now a major threat.
Only right wing Trump supporters always harp about Soros and his donations to every "left wing" organization in question.
The credibility of that statement is equivalent to Trump donating to the KKK, Neo Nazis and other right wing organizations.
He does not respond to your posts or even mentions your name. That is the very least that you should also do. That is the meaning of "Ignore".
You mean you won't ever discuss or back any agency, policy, politician or person who accepts money from the Koch bros?
No, but I acknowledge them as tools of the rich few, and add that to my judgement.
The little guys who work for these various superpac and grassroots organizations don't question the funding, and whether or not the paid heads recieved marching orders.
If you're not going to hold the Koch bros to the same standards as Soros, then you really should just shut up about Soros.
Unless you'd like to be called a hypocrite each time.
Your choice.
Actually I am. Citizens United was a bad decision.
Again. The corruption of the two party system and unfettered financing of it is imo the major issue.
The are two sides of the same 30 pieces of silver.
But you aren't holding Soros accountable because you agree with his politics.
Interesting that you choose to focus on those names but not names like Bono, Buffett, Gates, Aga Khan, or even Murdoch. I wonder if you do have something in common with groggy.
