Dream Spa
Toronto Escorts

Brett Kavanaugh and His Accuser Say They’re Willing to Testify

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,462
5,654
113
Glad you still have an open mind......

Anyway in the real world the Senate is the investigative body on the fitness of a judge. There is no crime to investigate here. The only thing left is the credibility of the Judge vs this lady. That's all that's left.

And the Senate has given her numerous ways to do this.

Personally I think she is reluctant because the Dems already leaked on her and will do so again. She can't trust them now if she wants a private setting and is already feeling enough heat due to this as well as the delay which caused this frenzy is now making her out to be a political operative.

Unless she comes forward publically this issue is dead.
I always have an open mind. No there is no crime, however it is important that the Senate gets to the bottom of this sexual assault incident.

Nothing to do with the Democrats "leaking" anything!! Obviously, if she comes to testify and this ends up as a..... "he said / she said," back and forth, then it will make her look even more frustrated.

We know that in 1991 President Bush ordered a FBI investigation on Judge Thomas after those sexual and physical assault allegations by Anita Hall. Those investigations lasted a good 3 days. It was passionately backed by the present Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Republican Grassley. Now the hypocrite just wants this to be concluded by Monday and needs Ford's response by Friday whether she wants to appear on that day.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/19/politics/anita-hill-clarence-thomas-allegations-timeline/index.html

So again, why should the FBI not conduct a full investigation??
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,462
5,654
113
It's so weird the Bver and the left don't believe this woman.[/URL]

"She states that she was in a very stressful environment for years, emotional and physical abuse by a partner with whom she is now separated," the report states. "She identifies the individual she was involved with as Congressman Ellison, and she is worried about retribution if she identifies him publicly."

It's so weird the Bver and the left don't believe this woman. far more credible evidence than the Kavanaugh accuser who doesn't even remember when and where her groping occurred.
It's so weird that b4u and the right wingers back Trump's support for Sexual Molester Rob Porter. The sexual and physical assault allegations against Porter were brought by these three women:

https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/07/politics/rob-porter-ex-wives-white-house/index.html

BTW, we do not know the whole story yet about Kavanaugh, unless there is a full FBI investigation. If she remembers exactly who the person was that committed that sexual assault on her and the other person who was present then 100% it did occur. It has tainted her for life, and so she has now decided to bring it out in the open, in spite of putting her very own reputation and the security of her family on the line with death threats from the alt right Trumptards. Well their cult leader Trumpty Dumpty has got far more serious allegations against him, so it is not surprising that they do not believe all these women's allegations!!
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,812
3,468
113
I always have an open mind. No there is no crime, however it is important that the Senate gets to the bottom of this sexual assault incident.

Nothing to do with the Democrats "leaking" anything!! Obviously, if she comes to testify and this ends up as a..... "he said / she said," back and forth, then it will make her look even more frustrated.

We know that in 1991 President Bush ordered a FBI investigation on Judge Thomas after those sexual and physical assault allegations by Anita Hall. Those investigations lasted a good 3 days. It was passionately backed by the present Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Republican Grassley. Now the hypocrite just wants this to be concluded by Monday and needs Ford's response by Friday whether she wants to appear on that day.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/19/politics/anita-hill-clarence-thomas-allegations-timeline/index.html

So again, why should the FBI not conduct a full investigation??
Actually Feinstein did leak this. The professor had asked for her name not to go public. Nor did she want to testify. She thought his nom was a slam dunk. Those are CNN's words.

I think she did this hoping she could stay out of it. That others would come forward(as they often do) and she could remain anonymous.

That still no one else has come up led to Feinstein doing this Hail Mary. And her life now so messed up.

I outlined all the reasons for no FBI investigation. And a lot of people agree with that assessment. The Senate at this point IS the investigative body. All that is left is the two people to testify.

Finally if Feinstein hadn't played politics and this information had been turned over two months ago the optics would be a magnitude better.

She messed up. And so unless the professor can prove herself credible it's over.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,812
3,468
113
Sorry. Hearsay after the fact in this political climate. 65 women signed a letter saying the opposite.

Only her testimony breaks the ice.
 

b4u

Active member
Jul 23, 2010
1,790
10
38
Doesn't remember where it happened, doesn't remember when it happened and 2 people she claimed were there and witnessed it have come forward to claim they don't know of any party she is talking about .

How do you feel about Ellisons accuser?
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,558
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Doesn't remember where it happened, doesn't remember when it happened and 2 people she claimed were there and witnessed it have come forward to claim they don't know of any party she is talking about .

How do you feel about Ellisons accuser?
And she didn’t name the judge during her therapy session.

At this point if she doesn’t show up Monday it’s over.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,644
17,845
113
Doesn't remember where it happened, doesn't remember when it happened and 2 people she claimed were there and witnessed it have come forward to claim they don't know of any party she is talking about .

How do you feel about Ellisons accuser?
How do you feel about this?

Accuser's schoolmate says she recalls hearing of alleged Kavanaugh incident
Cristina King Miranda says she recalls it being discussed at their school, but has no first-hand knowledge of the alleged assault by Brett Kavanaugh.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,812
3,468
113

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,558
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,154
2,605
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
BOOKER FACING CRITICISM FOR KAVANAUGH REACTION AFTER ADMITTING TO GROPING FRIEND IN HIGH SCHOOL


A Star-Ledger columnist called on New Jersey Democratic Sen. Cory Booker to give Supreme Court justice nominee Brett Kavanaugh the benefit of the doubt, given that Booker admitted to grabbing a friend’s breast before she pushed his hand away when he was 15.

Booker has called the allegations against Kavanaugh by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford “serious, credible, and deeply troubling,” and wants to delay the vote so law enforcement authorities can investigate the claims.

“New Year’s Eve 1984,” Booker wrote in the student-run Stanford Daily newspaper in 1992. “I will never forget. I was 15. As the ball dropped, I leaned over to hug a friend and she met me instead with an overwhelming kiss.”

“As we fumbled upon the bed, I remember debating my next ‘move’ as if it were a chess game. With the ‘Top Gun’ slogan ringing in my head, I slowly reached for her breast. After having my hand pushed away once, I reached my ‘mark.'”

https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/20/...&utm_campaign=atdailycaller&utm_medium=Social
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,462
5,654
113
Actually Feinstein did leak this. The professor had asked for her name not to go public. Nor did she want to testify. She thought his nom was a slam dunk. Those are CNN's words.

I think she did this hoping she could stay out of it. That others would come forward(as they often do) and she could remain anonymous.

That still no one else has come up led to Feinstein doing this Hail Mary. And her life now so messed up.

I outlined all the reasons for no FBI investigation. And a lot of people agree with that assessment. The Senate at this point IS the investigative body. All that is left is the two people to testify.

Finally if Feinstein hadn't played politics and this information had been turned over two months ago the optics would be a magnitude better.

She messed up. And so unless the professor can prove herself credible it's over.
Read Post #104 that was posted by Charlemagne!! Doctor Ford has now clearly stated that she will testify, as long as her safety is guaranteed. So again you a Trump supporter, has got all the actual facts all wrong.

I will repeat that Republican Senator Grassley who leads the Senate Judiciary Committee categorically did not want the FBI to investigate for this case, but he passionately supported Bush's stance when he initiated the FBI investigation of Judge Thomas in 1991 when Anita Hall brought those allegations against him. What HYPOCRITES these Republicans are especially when that idiot of a President stated that the FBI did not want to investigate this case. Trump has to initiate it not tell a BIG HUGE LIE that you seem to buy. Why are you all victimizing this lady who has much more credibility than that biased Kavanaugh??
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,462
5,654
113
Highschool hearsay, that is now being dropped by the original claimant

This reeks of desperation.
Read this part before you make such a random statement:
"Christine Blasey Ford was a year or so behind me," wrote the woman, Cristina King Miranda, who now works as a performing arts curator in Mexico City. "I did not know her personally but I remember her. This incident did happen."
Anyway, Ford will be testifying as long as they can guarantee her safety!!
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,812
3,468
113
Read Post #104 that was posted by Charlemagne!! Doctor Ford has now clearly stated that she will testify, as long as her safety is guaranteed. So again you a Trump supporter, has got all the actual facts all wrong.

I will repeat that Republican Senator Grassley who leads the Senate Judiciary Committee categorically did not want the FBI to investigate for this case, but he passionately supported Bush's stance when he initiated the FBI investigation of Judge Thomas in 1991 when Anita Hall brought those allegations against him. What HYPOCRITES these Republicans are especially when that idiot of a President stated that the FBI did not want to investigate this case. Trump has to initiate it not tell a BIG HUGE LIE that you seem to buy. Why are you all victimizing this lady who has much more credibility than that biased Kavanaugh??
Bver, you are all over the place. I don't think you are even reading things.

Right now the lawyers are talking. But she is trying to tell the Senate how to run things. That somehow Monday isn't "good" for her.

As to her safety Senators have also been receiving death threats. The best way to resolve them is in fact to testify as they are an intimidation tactic. Don't give in and they go away.

Nothing has changed. She is being accommodated. They will listen to her.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,812
3,468
113
Read this part before you make such a random statement:
"Christine Blasey Ford was a year or so behind me," wrote the woman, Cristina King Miranda, who now works as a performing arts curator in Mexico City. "I did not know her personally but I remember her. This incident did happen."
Anyway, Ford will be testifying as long as they can guarantee her safety!!
That's about a vague and hearsay as it gets. Wasn't there, doesn't know her, but a rumour is high school proves it?

Wow.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,812
3,468
113
Bver, you are all over the place. I don't think you are even reading things.

Right now the lawyers are talking. But she is trying to tell the Senate how to run things. That somehow Monday isn't "good" for her.

As to her safety Senators have also been receiving death threats. The best way to resolve them is in fact to testify as they are an intimidation tactic. Don't give in and they go away.

Nothing has changed. She is being accommodated. They will listen to her.
Let's see if the sticking point is going under oath.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,462
5,654
113
Bver, you are all over the place. I don't think you are even reading things.

Right now the lawyers are talking. But she is trying to tell the Senate how to run things. That somehow Monday isn't "good" for her.

As to her safety Senators have also been receiving death threats. The best way to resolve them is in fact to testify as they are an intimidation tactic. Don't give in and they go away.

Nothing has changed. She is being accommodated. They will listen to her.
She said she will testify NEXT WEEK but not on Monday as she wants her safety to be guaranteed. She would rather prefer an FBI investigation first just like the 1991 Anita Hall testimony that was approved by President Bush. Now who is all over the place. You are, as you have not read her own lawyer's email to CNN:

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/20/politics/christine-blasey-ford-brett-kavanaugh-testimony/index.html

Yes, this is from the horse's mouth, and not some random right wing source that you maybe following!!
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,558
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Read this part before you make such a random statement:
"Christine Blasey Ford was a year or so behind me," wrote the woman, Cristina King Miranda, who now works as a performing arts curator in Mexico City. "I did not know her personally but I remember her. This incident did happen."
Anyway, Ford will be testifying as long as they can guarantee her safety!!
"That it happened or not, I have no idea," Cristina King Miranda told NPR's Nina Totenberg. "I can't say that it did or didn't."
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts