You know it's interesting. When it comes to Law Enforcement, there needs to be a primary reason for investigation. So, for example; street walkers are considered a public safety issue due to the clients they bring into an area as well as their pimps and dealers. There's no nice way of saying it; but many many persons who work on the street have addiction issues (and often coupled with mental health challenges). It's a sad fact. The old law before amendment by the Harper Government actually spoke to the 'stopping of traffic', and it may have even listed carriages, as in horse and buggy. That's how old it was. The Laws were amended after a group of women in Toronto challenged and won on grounds their charter rights were being violated, (which they were). Police still do regular sweeps for street issues, but have moved the emphasis away from the workers, shifting towards the 'johns'. This is all under the guise of public safety. Now, in regards to escorts who advertise and use hotels etc. Police will target and aggressively pursue human traffickers. Which in my opinion, and I'm sure everyone on here, providers and clients, will agree they SHOULD pursue. Sexual slaver, any kind of slavery, is absolutely repugnant and needs to be stamped out permanently. Full stop. Many times Human Traffickers are connected to organized crime. Organized Crime is also worthy of pursuing by the Police, again, for obvious reasons. However, for the most part, if escorts are keeping a low profile, are not causing issues within the community, are not damaging the premises; other than the statue's 'electronic communication' clause etc, there really isn't much reason for Police to pursue the matter. If anything, in the future I could see the entire trade being regulated and licensed, which makes sense for any business (within reason). So you have to ask who's losing in the scenario of a provider advertising and then using, say a hotel? The hotel profits, again providing it doesn't bring unsavory persons into the business which in turn may drop their revenue or that the provider or guests don't damage the room. The provider profits, she/he continues to make a living, if they declare to CRA which they legally can, they'll be taxpayers. If they have a decent screening system they can avoid negative encounters with clients, as well as using forms of ppe to prevent disease. The client profits, as they have achieved their level of intimacy they desired. So, other than the above mentioned negative situations; i.e. human trafficking, organized crime etc, the trade can have a positive economic and sociological impact. There's no obvious reason for Police to pursue this.