If Babcock does see it yet does nothing about it then he isn't coaching in the best interest of the team is he? Putting guys together who have no on ice chemistry makes a lot of sense dude.Assuming you are right:
1)how do you know Babcock doesn't see it?
2)maybe he has other reasons for keeping them together.
Once again, somebody who thinks they know more than arguably the most highly respected coach in the NHL. I'm not necessarily saying that you are wrong, but to even just think that you know more than Babcock and his assistants do as to how to construct the lines is really, really stupid. Mind you, what was the feedback you got from Kadri and Marleau when you consulted them about this issue? Was it the same thing that they told to Babcock? What is their chemistry like in the dressing room and off the ice? Did you offer them any suggestions? Did they listen to your advice?
Waiting to hear your insights.
I think you get my point. There is no way you could have even .001% of the information that Babcock has at his disposal, let alone his coaching knowledge and experience. As such, your strong assertions on this matter are highly uninformed, relative to the coach and his staff.
So my 'strong' opinion on the matter somehow infers in your mind that I think I know more than Babcock. You're fucking logic is loony. Your attempt at mockery and insulting my intelligence borders on the pathetic. Is your self esteem really that low?