Toronto Escorts

Researchers Finally Uncover What Wiped Out The Mayan Civilization

Zaibetter

Banned
Mar 27, 2016
4,284
1
0
This was a dilemma for years and still not all known...

Many theories have been explored to try and explain the collapse of the Maya civilization. For years, evidence trying to prove these theories had been inconclusive – until now.

The Maya Empire, located in what is now present-day Guatemala, was a cultural epicenter that excelled at agriculture, pottery, writing, and mathematics. They reached their peak of power in the sixth century A.D., however, by 900 A.D. most of their great cities were abandoned.

For centuries researchers have tried to discover exactly how this great civilization could have fallen apart so quickly. A new report in Science, released on August 3, has finally given quantifiable evidence confirming the most widely-believed theory to explain how the Mayan civilization met its end: drought.

The key to unlocking the mystery ended up being located in Lake Chichancanab on the Yucatan Peninsula. For the report, researchers examined oxygen and hydrogen isotopes in sediment from the lake, which was close enough to the heart of Mayan civilization to provide an accurate sample of the climate.

For the report, Nicholas Evans, a Cambridge University research student and co-author of the paper, measured the isotopic composition of water found in the lake’s sediment to quantify exactly how much precipitation rates fell during the end of the Mayan civilization.

According to the Washington Post, analyzing sediment cores is a common practice for discovering information about the past. Scientists are able to inspect the dirt, layer by layer, and record the information found in the soil to construct an accurate timeline of the past conditions.

After examining the sediments samples, Evans, along with his team of researchers, concluded that annual rainfall levels declined 41 to 54 percent in the area surrounding the lake for several long periods over roughly 400 years, according to IFLScience.

The report also revealed that humidity in the area dropped by 2 to 7 percent. These two factors combined to had a devastating effect on the civilization’s agriculture production.

Because these drought conditions occurred frequently over hundreds of years, the civilization must not have been able to build up food reserves enough to make up for the drop in agricultural production, eventually leading to their demise.
Even though this paper ties up some loose ends surrounding the Mayan people, some big unanswered questions still remain, like what precisely brought on this massive and sustained drought?

A previous study showed that the Mayan’s deforestation could have contributed to the dry conditions, decreasing the moisture of the area and destabilizing the soil.

Evans said that the drought could have also been caused by changes to the atmospheric circulation and a decline in tropical cyclone frequency.

Matthew Lachinet, a professor in geosciences at the University of Nevada at Las Vegas, who was not involved in the study, told the Washington Post that this study is impactful because it offers insights into how humans can change the climate around them.

“Humans are affecting climate,” Lachinet said. “We’re making it warmer and it’s projected to become drier in Central America. What we could end up with is double-whammy of drought. If you coincide drying from natural causes with drying from human causes, then it amplified the strength of that drought.”

Despite these new findings, there is still much to learn about the collapse of Mayan civilization.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
The Russians meddled in their affairs.
 

Ref

Committee Member
Oct 29, 2002
5,074
1,008
113
web.archive.org
I always thought it was global warming caused by their advanced society. Either that or it was Mike Harris' fault.
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,495
11
38
Very much what Jared Diamond described in Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. Accommodate your expanding population by deforesting marginal land for agriculture, and you lessen it's water-retention capability and accelerate soil and nutrient loss that lowers its carrying capacity. All well and good when Nature keeps up her end of the supply chain, but it makes your entire civilization overly sensitive to even small decreases in an essential like rainfall in an area without significant rivers.

Of course it didn't wipe out the Maya or their culture. They just went from magnificent cities and a culture that dominate that whole part of their limited world of North, Central and South America to a poor underclass in today's Yucatan villages. Our world is far, far larger, and our global culture isn't sensitive to anything in Nature.

Nothing at all to do with us.
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,353
4,776
113
I thought this had been known for a long time.
 

jgd

Member
Aug 30, 2004
250
4
18
Ontario
Still makes no sense that the people would just stay and starve? Ethnic groups have been migrating around continents ever since there were humans. I would guess lots of the Mayans moved to more accommodating real estate.
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,495
11
38
Still makes no sense that the people would just stay and starve? Ethnic groups have been migrating around continents ever since there were humans. I would guess lots of the Mayans moved to more accommodating real estate.
I don't know what gave you the idea they all did the same thing: Stayed and starved. Bad TV?

Of course they migrated. And were stopped and turned back at some borders, others exploited as cheap and willing labour as they crossed elsewhere. And some prospered while others didn't, and some intermarried and blended and the distinctions disappeared. Or not.

And even millennia later some ordinary looking person far removed might surprise you by claiming Mayan heritage you'd never have guessed, just as proudly as an Yorkshire woman might claim Norse blood from ancestors who arrived with William the Conqueror in 1066.

But the entire civilization disappeared, swallowed by the jungle and forgotten by all but the remaining Maya in their folk-tales until a century ago.
 
Last edited:

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
59,843
6,341
113
Still makes no sense that the people would just stay and starve? Ethnic groups have been migrating around continents ever since there were humans. I would guess lots of the Mayans moved to more accommodating real estate.
I'm sure some did.

Of course it's a bit of a challenge travelling hundreds of miles on foot across rough terrain to a place controlled by another group of people (likely hostile or previously subjugated by the Mayans) where the people there are already struggling to survive. That also assumes they were able to identify that the climactic changes were a long-term problem and not just "natural variation" (sounds familiar somehow - at least we don't think sacrificing people and throwing
them into deep pits will somehow convince the gods to make things better).
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,495
11
38
Link to the article this comes from?
Zaibetter's not fond of such common courtesies and standard aids to understanding.

Buried in the article (which seems to be from more popular — but never mainstream — media) you'll find "A new report in Science, released on August 3" authored by "Nicholas Evans, a Cambridge University student". Hope that helps.
 

Mazzi

New member
Dec 27, 2016
435
2
0
meh, drought... doesn't mean squat really, answers very little, and its still a weak answer.

How did they build the things they did? How did they do the things they did?
 

Darts

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2017
23,061
11,164
113
For what it is worth, I'll throw in the "alien theory". They all left Earth and returned to their home planet.
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,495
11
38
meh, drought... doesn't mean squat really, answers very little, and its still a weak answer.

How did they build the things they did? How did they do the things they did?
And those are entirely different questions, so it's no wonder they weren't answered. But I'll help you out a little: They built and did those great things the way any rich and prosperous society does; by large numbers of individuals working together with an organized plan to accomplish them, supported by others not directly involved. Just takes time.

I don't know why you'd consider drought "weak", as it was powerful enough to did bring down their civilization. Reflect a little on how impossible it is for any significant number of people to survive in a place without water to drink or grow food. Whether they're a simple peasant family or specialized members of a sophisticated and highly organized society, they'll have to go where the water is. Or die. And what they built will be left behind.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts