Negative coverage was very similar as a percentage. Granted it felt like there was more negative coverage of Trump simply because there was more coverage of him overall.Seriously? The same amount of negative coverage?
That's awesome. That wopper will get you a job as Trump's press secretary if you have the balls.
The press has been, rightly in my opinion, criticized for covering Trump more because he tailored his message to the needs of journalists (smart).
If the liberals want to be mad at anybody it should be news media. They consistently failed to report on issues, because they're in it for fame & fortune, not some higher calling like mere truth. Fourth estate indeed.
KK
https://www.politico.com/blogs/on-m...verage-overwhelmingly-negative-in-tone-232307