Toronto Girlfriends
Toronto Escorts

CNN Report: Millions Of American Voters May Have Colluded To Elect Trump

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,703
21
38

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,331
5,556
113
Let us hear it from Jade Tapper's mouth. Any credible witness / source / video to clarify this 2017 random link?
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
69,910
68,405
113
Let no one ever say that you're not a witty, witty guy, Chicken Little.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
That's hilarious! Whoever wrote this is giving The Onion run for its money.
 

LT56

Banned
Feb 16, 2013
1,604
1
0
This is disgusting. The US system is rigged. As many as 60 million Americans participated in the collusion.

https://babylonbee.com/news/cnn-report-millions-american-voters-may-colluded-elect-trump/
*sighs*

Babylon Bee

Satire

These sources exclusively use humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people’s stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues. Primarily these sources are clear that they are satire and do not attempt to deceive. See all Satire sources.

Notes: The Babylon Bee is a Christian news satire website. Their tagline reads: The Babylon Bee is Your Trusted Source For Christian News Satire. (1/21/2017)
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/babylon-bee/


Are you old enough to be on this site?
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,703
21
38
Let no one ever say that you're not a witty, witty guy, Chicken Little.
Yeah well it did reveal how dim LT56 is. I'm not sure about bver_hunter but his take could just be lost in translation.

As for you, oagre. Learn to laugh a little.
 

LT56

Banned
Feb 16, 2013
1,604
1
0
Yeah well it did reveal how dim bver_hunter and LT56 are.

As for you, oagre. Learn to laugh a little.
LOL...You thought it was real, dummy. You thought it was your ultimate Gotcha Moment to prove CNN is fake news...BUT all you wound up doing was (as always) re-establishing yourself as an ignorant bonehead who couldn’t recognize actual fake news if he tripped over it.

You’re even dumber than Butler1000 who thinks Mike Pompeo is part of the “Deep State”.

LMAO
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,703
21
38
LOL...You thought it was real, dummy. You thought it was your ultimate Gotcha Moment to prove CNN is fake news...BUT all you wound up doing was (as always) re-establishing yourself as an ignorant bonehead who couldn’t recognize actual fake news if he tripped over it.

You’re even dumber than Butler1000 who thinks Mike Pompeo is part of the “Deep State”.

LMAO
I'm not sure if you're being serious. If you are.....:der:

Think harder.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,331
5,556
113
Yeah well it did reveal how dim LT56 is. I'm not sure about bver_hunter but his take could just be lost in translation.

As for you, oagre. Learn to laugh a little.
If you comprehend English, the translation is pretty basic. Resurrected a 2017 link with zero sense of humour.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,094
2,592
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
*sighs*



https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/babylon-bee/


Are you old enough to be on this site?
Scam site “Media Bias Fact Check” caught cribbing its ratings from Wikipedia


The public’s paranoia toward “fake news” over the past year has opened the door for a different kind of scam artistry: websites that try to get ahead by tricking the public into believing that real news outlets are fake. One of the most notorious scams has come in the form of a site called Media Bias Fact Check, which offers no information of the sort, and instead offers amateurish “ratings” of various news outlets. These ratings are inaccurate, useless, and changed at random. Even worse, in at least some instances, its “ratings” are simply based on information it’s cribbed from Wikipedia.

The “Media Bias Fact Check” scam is built around the premise of convincing gullible internet users that various respected news outlets are compromised because they’re “biased” in way or another. This allows its victims to believe they know something that others don’t know, and causes them to comment with links to these phony ratings in reply to articles posted from the news outlets in question. But the Media Bias Fact Check ratings often read like a fifth grader’s unfinished homework assignment or worse. For instance here’s the entirety of the “rating” for popular magazine Cosmopolitan:

“Cosmopolitan is an international fashion magazine for women and has a circulation of over 3 million. (Wikipedia) Cosmo’s primary focus is on fashion, sex and relationship tips, but they also cover politics. Cosmo has a strong left wing bias in reporting and story selection. Though biased, Cosmo usually publishes sourced information.”



That’s it. That’s the entire “rating” provided by Media Bias Fact Check. The person who wrote this rating has clearly never so much as looked at Cosmopolitan, and has included no examples to support the “Left Bias” rating that it’s randomly assigned to the magazine. And stunningly, coming up with the above entirely useless four-sentence rating required cribbing at least one of those sentences from Wikipedia of all places. Even students get flunked for using Wikipedia as a source. Other “ratings” on this scam site are even more amateurish.



But with a scam site like this, the details don’t matter. By putting the words “Fact Check” in its name, and then assigning negative ratings to news outlets, Media Bias Fact Check is creating the phony appearance that these negative ratings are based on a lack of factual accuracy. The site is counting on gullible people not fully grasping the difference between accuracy and bias, and it’s certainly counting on its victims never bothering to read the pitiful explanations provided for the ratings it assigns, or seeing the part where it admits the site in question is factually accurate. In that sense, falling for scam sites like “Media Bias Fact Check” is no different than falling for fake news. We’re working with our contacts at the major social media networks to get these fraudulent “rating” sites banned before they do any more harm.

http://www.palmerreport.com/politic...ght-cribbing-its-ratings-from-wikipedia/2342/
 

Promo

Active member
Jan 10, 2009
2,480
0
36
Scam site “Media Bias Fact Check” caught cribbing its ratings from Wikipedia

...............

http://www.palmerreport.com/politic...ght-cribbing-its-ratings-from-wikipedia/2342/
C-M, did you check any of the facts, or is this just another cut-and-past job from a site that supports your political agenda?

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com describes their analysis methodology here: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/methodology/
I think most people will consider their approach valid and as even-handed as is possible based on the type of service they are providing. You will also note that they allow the public to vote, but carefully weigh the results when using the public data.

As per you example Cosmo, I can only guess you are claiming that Cosmo should not be left bias? From wiki: "In September 2014, Cosmopolitan began endorsing political candidates. The endorsements are based on "established criteria" agreed upon by the magazine's editors. Specifically, Cosmopolitan will only endorse candidates that support equal pay laws, legal abortion, free contraceptives, gun control, and oppose voter identification laws. Amy Odell, editor of Cosmopolitan.com, has stated that under no circumstances will the magazine endorse a political candidate that is pro-life: "We’re not going to endorse someone who is pro-life because that’s not in our readers’ best interest.”[36] According to Joanna Coles, the magazine's Editor-in-Chief, the endorsements of Cosmopolitan will focus on "candidates in swing states or candidates who are strongly in favor of issues like contraception coverage or gun control."[36] In the 2014 U.S. elections, Cosmopolitan officially endorsed twelve Democratic candidates. However, only two of them won their respective political campaigns."
^^^-- although I believe the line between right/left, conservative/liberal is very blurred these days (I believe in pro-choice and much stronger licensing for gun control and I'm conservative), clearly Cosmo is left.
 

LT56

Banned
Feb 16, 2013
1,604
1
0
The sad part is that you thought it was amusing.
He also thought this anti Semitic image of scary-looking Progressives being controlled by an evil Jewish spider was somehow witty and insightful when he posted it in the Cadet Bone Spurs Avoids Protests thread.

https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthrea...e-Spurs-be-able-to-hide-from-all-the-protests

Tells us all we need to know about smallcock’s “sense of humour.”





Smallcock is an anti Semitic, Alt Right lunatic.

Nuff said.
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,703
21
38

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,703
21
38
My apologies- You are not just an anti Semitic Alt Right lunatic; you are also a racist.

A glaring oversight on my part.
The author of that editorial is a Black Ph.D. student who has lived in Africa, Eastern Europe, and the UK. He has more "racist" and worldly experiences than you ever will.
 

LT56

Banned
Feb 16, 2013
1,604
1
0
The author of that editorial is a Black Ph.D. student who has lived in Africa, Eastern Europe, and the UK. He has more "racist" and worldly experiences than you ever will.
And Ben Carson was a renowned neurosurgeon before he started attacking poor people in subsidized housing and buying $31000 dining sets for his office. What’s your point?

It doesn’t change the fact that you’re a bigoted Alt Right loon.


 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
79,750
17,571
113
The author of that editorial is a Black Ph.D. student who has lived in Africa, Eastern Europe, and the UK. He has more "racist" and worldly experiences than you ever will.
I'd offer you a shovel but you seem to be digging yourself in deeper quite well on your own.

Four members of the GOP on Trump:
Jeff Flake tweeted: "I never thought I would see the day when our American President would stand on the stage with the Russian President and place blame on the United States for Russian aggression." Lindsey Graham tweeted that Trump's response "will be seen by Russia as a sign of weakness and create far more problems than it solves." Ben Sasse added that "the United States is not to blame […] When the President plays these moral equivalence games, he gives Putin a propaganda win he desperately needs." And, John McCain called Trump's appearance "tragic" and "one of the most disgraceful performances by an American president in memory." (CNN / ABC News / Politico)
That was a slim majority that the republicans held, wasn't it?
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts