Maybe some DF-17s hypersonic missiles from China. China has already proven American battle fleets are very susceptible to small diesel subs.
Perhaps we can offer a military base on Canadian territory in exchange for some military toys.
Does Canada have Nukes?
- Thread starter lumenon9
- Start date
Perhaps we can offer a military base on Canadian territory in exchange for some military toys.
Do you not recognize dry humour when you see it?This is fucking hilarious! You do realize Canada's strategy to defend themselves is to be pals with big bad USA so they will protect them? Canada cannot defend itself, let alone piss of it's main source of protection.
Sure ..... pull out of Norad, kick out all the US military from DND. Recall all Canadian Forces personnel from the US. Then get yourself some nukes. A real winning strategy.
Perhaps you'd like to build up your military first so you can begin to imitate a country able to defend itself. Maybe Justine can raise the Carbon Tax to pay for that. Bend over a little further, it won't hurt TOO much.
Perhaps we'll start by first throwing out all Americans who live in our country, being the good patriots that they are.
And trump undid 100+ of years of positive relationship in just a few months .... with dozens of his allies. He made it personal. Maybe it's time for a changeWhat you and Managee write.
Ninety-seven years on this is taking Defence Scheme No. 1 to a level of stupidity that Colonel Brown couldn't possibly have either imagined or wanted.
When you were asked “Why” Canada should acquire nukes you responded with:It wouldn't be for hostile purposes. If Canada wanted to build nukes as part of its general defense strategy as a sovereign nation could they? They wouldn't be aimed at the US (at least for now -lol). Can Japan start building its own nukes? why not Canada.
How would you think we could get away with something as duplicitous as this? Telling our friends and neighbors to our South “Don’t worry, they’re not for you (at least for now - lol)” might not be entirely believable, especially since there would need to be a reason less asinine than the one you gave (“The bully south of the Border and the Republican Party.”) That poses an unacceptable risk, particularly in knowing that the success of a full-scale invasion from the South would be measured in hours, if not days.The Bully south of the Border and the Republican Party. We look/are weak without them. Why doesn't Canada have Nukes?
As you know, isolationist policies (DPRK and Iran) or a regime-change (Iraq and Libya) would NEED to be implemented on the grounds of national security interests.
Japan is a de-facto nuclear state. It likely has the ability to produce a weapon within a year of changing its stance towards the NPT. Why it hasn’t is for similar but different reasons from the Canada; it would negatively, perhaps irreversibly affect its relationship with the USA. As a hegemonic power, even allied states that dramatically disrupt regional dynamics in SEA and EA, pose a risk. Particularly if whatever Trumpty agreed to includes complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.
Yes, Canada is a sovereign country and has the legal right to produce weapons it sees fit in-order to protect itself (once they pull out of the NPT - which we won’t). It would be the stupidest move in the history of defence, as the country would be long-gone by the time the program could actually be completed, as US security needs trump rights to national sovereignty of hostile (and pretend-friendly) nations every time.
