Toronto Escorts

EXCLUSIVE: Mueller agrees to narrow scope of questions in bid to interview Trump

Charlemagne

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2017
15,451
2,484
113
EXCLUSIVE: Mueller agrees to narrow scope of questions in bid to interview Trump

Rudy Giuliani says there will be no ‘fishing’ expedition

By Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times - Thursday, May 17, 2018

Rudolph W. Giuliani, President Trump’s attorney, says special counsel Robert Mueller has agreed to avoid a “fishing” expedition by narrowing the subject of questions in an effort to get the president to submit to an interview with the prosecutor.

Mr. Giuliani also says he thinks fired FBI Director James B. Comey is “not going to be worth anything as a witness” and thus less a threat to the president.

Mr. Giuliani told The Washington Times that Mr. Mueller’s team displayed a good-faith effort during a Wednesday meeting that might result in an interview in July and a final Mueller report by Labor Day.

“He’s eliminated a lot of subjects that would have indicated he was fishing,” Mr. Giuliani told The Times on Thursday. “He’s eliminated those, and he’s into a much more relevant area where we know the answers and we know the answers really can’t be effectively contradicted.”

He declined to specify what topics have been dropped.

He has contended from the start that there is no evidence of Trump collusion in Russian election interference. The other two major topics: whether the president somehow obstructed justice in the firing of Mr. Comey, a Mueller friend, and whether he might commit perjury in answering questions under oath.

Mr. Giuliani is a longtime Trump friend who was brought in to try to bring an end to Mr. Mueller’s inquiry. He said a final agreement on testifying would include the subjects; an exchange of questions and any Trump objections; a place and time; and a schedule for a final report.

“What I’m telling you, none has been agreed to,” he said, putting the chance of an interview at 50-50. He said he could agree to a two- to three-hour interview.

On perjury, the issue would be Mr. Comey’s word in contemporaneous memos he wrote of discussions with the president versus Mr. Trump’s recollection.

Mr. Comey leaked his memos to the press with the express purpose of prompting the appointment of a special counsel. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein complied.

Mr. Comey said Mr. Trump urged him to end an investigation into retired Army Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, his brief national security adviser. Mr. Trump said he did not.

Mr. Giuliani said Mr. Comey has revealed himself to be a leaker of confidential material.

He also believes Mr. Comey’s credibility will be damaged by an upcoming report by Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz on how the director handled the Hillary Clinton email investigation.

“We don’t have a problem with him under oath,” Mr. Giuliani said. “What we have a problem is they’re using somebody else as the arbiter of truth, like Comey. We think when Horowitz gets finished with him he’s not going to be worth anything as a witness.”

Mr. Giuliani said he wants Mr. Mueller to “show a realistic attitude toward the guy I think was going to be their chief witness, Comey, who is falling apart in front of us.”

Asked whether Mr. Mueller’s team believes they have evidence of collusion, Mr. Giuliani said, “Actually, when you press them really hard, they say they can put this together and that together. But do they have any hard evidence of it? Do they have evidence that could be sustained in some kind of a proceeding? No.”

Asked about Mr. Mueller’s strategy, Mr. Giuliani said:

“I think they are relying more on obstruction and they wish perjury from their point of view than they are on collusion with the Russians. I think every time they’ve gone up the collusion alley it’s gone nowhere. That becomes the biggest obstacle to our testifying. Why are we going to get them to use the president’s word against himself? He’s already given all the explanations that they need to make a decision in his public comments. His comments under oath are not going to be materially different than this public comments. And if they would be we would tell them that. ‘On further reflection, he remembers this and that.’ So far, there haven’t been too many further reflections.”

Mr. Giuliani said the Mueller team understands that Mr. Trump could not sit for questioning before the proposed summit with North Korea on June 12.

“Of course Mueller agrees with that,” he said. “I think he’s anxious to wrap up because he’s become a bit of a target now. He realized he would get nowhere if he tried to do it now. We couldn’t prepare. He couldn’t force him if he went to court. It might jeopardize his ability to question him at all.”

Mr. Giuliani previously said one agreement he procured is that Mr. Mueller agrees he cannot legally indict the president.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/may/17/robert-mueller-agrees-narrow-scope-questions-bid-i/
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,815
3,470
113
If it's true.......

Looks like there isn't much there.......
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,558
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Why would the POTUS agree to be interviewed?
 

LT56

Banned
Feb 16, 2013
1,604
1
0
I’d actually like to see Mueller try to subpoena Trump to testify before a Grand Jury and have Trump contest it in court if for no other reason than to see how the Supreme Court would rule on it. Clinton was ordered to testify in a civil proceeding so you’d think the same logic would apply...but who the fuck knows?
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,815
3,470
113
I’d actually like to see Mueller try to subpoena Trump to testify before a Grand Jury and have Trump contest it in court if for no other reason than to see how the Supreme Court would rule on it. Clinton was ordered to testify in a civil proceeding so you’d think the same logic would apply...but who the fuck knows?
Imagine if it was on the way in court and a justice died and needed to be replaced........
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,681
17,856
113
I’d actually like to see Mueller try to subpoena Trump to testify before a Grand Jury and have Trump contest it in court if for no other reason than to see how the Supreme Court would rule on it. Clinton was ordered to testify in a civil proceeding so you’d think the same logic would apply...but who the fuck knows?
Did you watch Guiliani get all uppity when shown a quote where he said a president must submit to a subpoena?
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2018/05/18/rudy-giuliani-subpoena-upset-robert-mueller.cnn
Its pretty hilarious.

We all know that Trump wouldn't last more then 10 seconds on the stand without perjuring himself.
 
Toronto Escorts