Toronto Escorts

Trump Tower transcripts detail quest for dirt on Hillary Clinton

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,462
5,650
113
Thousands of pages of interview transcripts with the participants of the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting shed new light on how eager Donald Trump Jr. and senior members of the Trump campaign were to obtain damaging information on Hillary Clinton — and how frustrated and angry they were that the material did not come to fruition.

The nearly 2,000 pages of interviews do not appear to contain information that would change the course of special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Trump's team and Russia. But the transcripts released by the Senate Judiciary Committee fill in new details about how Trump Jr., President Donald Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner and then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort were expecting a bombshell from Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya.
Rob Goldstone, the British music publicist who arranged the Trump Tower meeting, told the committee he was anticipating a "smoking gun" from Veselnitskaya when he urged Trump Jr. to take the meeting, even though he thought it was a "bad idea and that we shouldn't do it."
"I just sent somebody an email that says I'm setting up a meeting for someone that is going to bring you damaging information about somebody who was running to become the President of the United States," Goldstone said. "I thought that was worthy of the words 'smoking gun,' yes."
The Senate Judiciary Committee's release Wednesday of the Trump Tower transcripts and hundreds of pages of exhibits provide the most comprehensive view yet into the circumstances surrounding the controversial meeting and the details of the roughly 20-minute encounter, in which Trump's team was expecting dirt from Veselnitskaya.
The meeting -- and whether President Trump knew about it -- has become a central focus of Mueller's investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, as well as the congressional Russia investigations. Trump Jr. has told House investigators that he did not communicate with his father about the meeting before it happened. The White House has said the President weighed in on a misleading statement his son issued after the meeting became publicly known, more than a year later.
Trump Jr. — who had emailed Goldstone ahead of the meeting about the dirt, "if it's what you say I love it" — told congressional investigators he was interested in "listening to information" about Clinton in the June Trump Tower meeting. "I had no way of assessing where it came from, but I was willing to listen," he said.
Trump Jr. also said he did not inform his father about the meeting ahead of time, because he didn't want to bring him "unsubstantiated" information.
And when the damaging information didn't materialize, as Veselnitskaya focused on US sanctions on Russia under the Magnitsky Act that the US passed to punish Russian human rights abuses, the testimony gives new insight into how Trump's team reacted.
"Jared Kushner, who is sitting next to me, appeared somewhat agitated by this and said, 'I really have no idea what you're talking about. Could you please focus a bit more and maybe just start again?'" Goldstone said of Kushner, who was not interviewed by the committee. "And I recall that she began the presentation exactly where she had begun it last time, almost word for word, which seemed, by his body language, to infuriate him even more."
But there is also discrepancy between the meeting participants about how long Kushner was present. While Kushner and Trump Jr. have said the now-White House senior adviser left in the middle of the meeting, others who were there told the committee they remembered Kushner staying the whole time.
The committee on Wednesday released transcripts and hundreds of pages of related material from nine people connected to the meeting. The documents contain a record of closed-door committee interviews with five of the eight meeting attendees, including Trump Jr., Goldstone, Russian-American lobbyist Rinat Akhmetshin, translator Anatoli Samochornov and Ike Kaveladze, a Russian with ties to oligarch Aras Agalarov.
Following the documents' release, Trump Jr. said the transcripts show he "answered every question asked."
"I appreciate the opportunity to have assisted the Judiciary Committee in its inquiry," Trump Jr. said in a statement, "The public can now see that for over five hours I answered every question asked and was candid and forthright with the Committee. I once again thank Chairman Grassley and Ranking Member Feinstein, as well as other members of the Committee and their staff for their courtesy and professionalism."
RELATED - Recreating June 9: A very consequential day in the 2016 campaign
The committee's documents also included responses from Veselnitskaya, as well as a statement from Kushner and a page of notes from Manafort. The committee also included the formal release of the transcript of Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson, who was not at the Trump Tower meeting but whose transcript was unilaterally released in January by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee.
In January, Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley said he planned to release the transcripts because the committee's interviews connected to the Trump Tower meetings had wrapped up. Democrats had pressed Grassley to subpoena Kushner for his testimony or schedule a public hearing for Trump Jr., but he chose not to do so following Feinstein's decision to release the Simpson transcript.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/16/poli...-committee-trump-tower-transcripts/index.html
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,462
5,650
113
Qatari investor confirms he attended Trump Tower meetings in 2016:
A Qatari investor referenced in a series of tweets from Michael Avenatti this week confirmed to CNN through a spokesperson on Tuesday that he did attend meetings at Trump Tower in December 2016.

The stated reason: Ahmed Al-Rumaihi wanted face time with Trump transition officials.
"Mr. Al-Rumaihi was at Trump Tower on December 12, 2016. He was there in his then role as head of Qatar Investments, an internal division of QIA, to accompany the Qatari delegation that was meeting with Trump transition officials on that date," said a spokesperson for Sport Trinity, a company that Al-Rumaihi co-owns. "He did not participate in any meetings with Michael Flynn, and his involvement in the meetings on that date was limited."
https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/15/politics/qatari-investor-trump-tower-meetings-2016/index.html

More interesting and a lot more to be disclosed.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,812
3,468
113
So basically they were doing what she did with the dossier.....
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,462
5,650
113
The 31 most important, insightful and just plain odd lines from Donald Trump Jr.'s Russia testimony:

On Wednesday morning, the Senate Judiciary Committee released a slew of transcripts related to its investigation of a June 2016 meeting at Trump Tower between the top brass of Donald Trump's presidential campaign and several Russians, including Natalia Veselnitskaya, a Russian lawyer.

The meeting was arranged by Rob Goldstone, a publicist for Emin Agalarov, a Russian music star and the son of billionaire Aras Agalarov, with the express purpose of sharing "dirt" on Hillary Clinton. It has become one of the critical moments of the ongoing special counsel investigation into Russia's interference into the 2016 election and possible collusion with the Trump campaign.
The transcripts released Wednesday provide the most detailed version of events of that day we have seen to date. (You can see them all here.)
I zeroed in on Don Jr.'s testimony -- all 232 pages of it! -- given that he is not only the eldest son of the President of the United States but was also Goldstone's contact in setting up the meeting.
The 31 most important, intriguing, insightful and, occasionally, odd lines from Don Jr. are below:

1. "As will become clear, I did not collude with any foreign government and do not know of anyone who did."
Don Jr. gets the big thing out of the way early on in his opening statement. To paraphrase someone else: "No collusion!"
2. "Rob was among the many individuals who would reach out from time to time to congratulate us on winning a primary or to show their support."
It appears as though Goldstone, the music publicist, was doing what he could to get in good with the Trumps -- making sure Don Jr. and even Don Sr. knew he was following the presidential race closely, and that he was 100% behind Trump.
3. "In his email to me, Rob suggested that someone had official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary Clinton and her dealings with Russia and that the information would be very useful to the campaign."
This isn't new -- we know that Goldstone promised "dirt" on Clinton -- but it is helpful to have Don Jr. on the record about what he thought he was getting from Goldstone. The Trump Jr. argument, which he makes repeatedly later in his testimony, is that there was nothing wrong with his interest in Goldstone's information because he believed Goldstone to be a bit of an exaggerator and wanted to know more rather than take what the publicist was saying at face value.
4. "As much as some have made of the phrase 'I love it,' it was simply a colloquial way of saying that I appreciated Rob's gesture."
Hmmm. Trump responded to Goldstone's email that he had "dirt" on Clinton by saying he loved it because it was a way of thanking Goldstone for the gesture, not an indication that he was excited about what the information might be? A simple "thank you" wouldn't have sufficed?

5. "While Rob said he would send me the names of the attendees for the June 9th meeting, he never did."
This is very important. Trump says -- under oath no less! -- that he had no idea who was coming to the meeting in which the dirt was promised. Yes, Goldstone said he had dirt and that it came from Russians but that was it. And, as I mentioned above, Trump Jr. argues that because he didn't take Goldstone super-seriously he wasn't really sure about the source of the information or the information itself.
6. "After perfunctory greetings, the lawyers began telling the group very generally something about individuals connected to Russia supporting or funding Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton or the Democratic National Committee. It was quite difficult for me to understand what she was saying or why."
This is the alleged "dirt." Which Trump portrays as a total and compete nothing-burger -- and simply a ruse by the Russians to get a meeting with him, Jared Kushner and Paul Manafort about the Magnitsky Act.
7. "I have no recollection of documents being offered or left for us."
This isn't quite a "no." So, there is a possibility the Russians -- Veselnitskaya, etc. -- may have left documents for the Trump team. But, Don Jr. can't remember.
8. "Did you inform your father about the meeting or the underlying offer prior to the meeting?" "No, I did not."
Important. Trump Jr. is asked if he ever mentioned the June meeting at Trump Tower to his father. He is definitive: "I did not."
9. "Again, I don't remember much from the meeting because I didn't give it much credence at the time."
This is a tactic Don Jr. used repeatedly in his testimony -- he lacks clear recollection of what happened because it was sort of a useless meeting. He thought he was getting dirt on Clinton. When it was clear -- and this happened quickly -- that he wasn't, he sort of checked out mentally.
10. "[Kushner] showed up a few minutes late and left a few minutes early to take a phone call."
Jared Kushner is all of us.
11. "Did you take any notes at the meeting?" "I didn't, no."
I'm not sure whether Trump's lack of note-taking was purposeful -- leave no paper trail and all that -- or whether he simply didn't think there was anything of note in the meeting. We'll never know which it was because, well, Trump Jr. didn't take notes.
12. "After the meeting but prior to the news of it breaking this summer, did you discuss the meeting with anyone?" "No, I did not."
Trump Jr., according to his version of events, goes to a meeting with Russians and two top members of the campaign apparatus. But, he never speaks of the meeting -- not to his father, not to the other meeting attendees -- ever again.
13. "I do not know. I imagine I was talking about Russian government people, not Russian nationals, because I would have no way of knowing how many people of Russian descent that I would have met along the campaign trail every day for two and a half years."
This is in reference to a quote Don. Jr. gave to The New York Times in March 2017. Here are the relevant lines from the story: "Asked at that time whether he had ever discussed government policies related to Russia, the younger Mr. Trump replied, 'A hundred percent no.'"
Track the publicly known developments of the sprawling investigations into Trump and Russia.
The meeting at Trump Tower in June 2016 would seem to contradict that claim, given that the Magnitsky Act was discussed. Trump Jr's attempt to threat that needle is to argue that he interpreted the Times question to be in reference to official represetnatives of the Russian government -- which he had no idea that anyone in the June 2016 meeting was.
14. "It did not talk about what got them into the door and I didn't expand on it because I didn't think it was relevant to discuss what the meeting was not actually about even if that's what the email was."
Don Jr.'s first statement in the wake of the revelation of the June 2016 meeting was, in retrospect, decidedly narrow and, by almost any reading, misleading in what it left out.
Here's that statement: "It was a short introductory meeting. I asked Jared and Paul to stop by. We primarily discussed a program about the adoption of Russian children that was active and popular with American families years ago and was since ended by the Russian government, but it was not a campaign issue at the time and there was no follow up."
The argument he made to the Senate Judiciary Committee was that he didn't mention why the meeting happened in the first place -- to get "dirt" on Clinton -- because no dirt was gotten.
15. "I don't know. I never spoke to my father about it."
Don Jr. here insists he never spoke directly to his dad about that initial statement about the Trump Tower meeting.
16. "To the best of your knowledge, did the President provide any edits to the statement or other input? "He may have commented through Hope Hicks."
So. Trump Jr. and Trump didn't speak or communicate directly about the initial statement. But, Trump Jr. leaves a BIG opening to allow for the idea that his father simply told Hicks the changes he wanted made and then she conveyed those to Trump Jr. and his lawyers.
17. "[Hope Hicks] asked if I wanted to actually speak to him, and I chose not to because I didn't want to bring him into something that he had nothing to do with."
Maybe. But also to protect Trump from jeopardy related to being directly involved in dictating a statement about the meeting which, remember, according to Don Jr., he had zero idea about.
18. "I have one phone."
Same. But, I was sort of surprised Don Jr. wasn't a two- or even three-phone guy.
19. "He's sort of a big personality, creates sort of a vacuum."
Don Jr.'s assessment of his dad is, um, spot on.
20. "I think, especially knowing Goldstone and his personality, I imagine there was a discount factor to anything that was written."
Again, Trump Jr. is very interested in portraying Goldstone as a sort-of loveable huckster who he never took all that seriously. Which, theoretically, explains why he wanted to verify the "dirt" Goldstone was promising before speaking to lawyers or anyone else about it.
21. "I responded in 20 minutes because if I get an email, I respond to it. If I see it, I respond."
My inbox currently has 13,032 unopened emails. I hate myself.
22. "I didn't think that listening to someone with information relevant to the fitness and character of a presidential candidate would be an issue, no."
The key here is that Trump Jr. is fuzzy -- in his telling -- about exactly where the information is coming from. He says he had no reason to believe it was from any sort of official Russian channel and had even less reason to believe it was totally credible because Goldstone was sort of a cartoonish and unreliable figure.

What's difficult to square is this line from Goldstone's emails with Don Jr. setting up the meeting: "This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government's support for Mr. Trump - helped along by Aras and Emin."
23. "Did you tell your father about this email?" "I did not."
Again, Trump Jr. is totally and completely definitive that he didn't show or tell his father about the Goldstone email setting up the June 2016 meeting.
24. "It just became pretty obvious to me that they were not representatives of the Russian government."
It's not clear to me how this became evident so quickly to Trump Jr. in the June 2016 meeting. But, it informs his belief, I suppose, that he was doing nothing wrong by talking to them about alleged "dirt" on Clinton.
25. "So was any information specific to Hillary Clinton provided during the meeting?" "No, there was not."
This much-ballyhooed meeting promising negative information amounted to absolutely nothing, according to Don Jr.
26. "I think the only time I responded to them was, hey, when I am I going to receive the next leak. And they would reach out on a few occasions, sort of passing along news, hey, you may want to tweet this, this would be of interest probably with some sort of admin there."
Don Jr. acknowledges that, yes, he was in some very limited contact with WikiLeaks -- and that he reached out to them at one point asking when they were going to leak more stuff
27. "I believe it was after we had already secured -- meaning after the election, but I could be mistaken. The only reason I'm aware of it is because it occurred in my office. I came back from the gym and they were in there."
After working out, Trump Jr. came back to a meeting in his office between Kushner, Michael Flynn and then-Russian Ambassador to the US Sergey Kislyak. (He thinks.) He did not go into the meeting because of, well, sweat.
28. "I don't do Snapchat, I have enough forms of of social media."
Story of my life, Donnie J. Story of my life.
29. "Do you have a home landline?" "I believe I do, but I don't even know the number of it."
It's like he's in my head!
30. "Have you ever been told that Russia has compromising information on your father?" "No."
No Kompromat! And, worth noting that Don Jr. also told the Senate committee that he was unaware that the Russians had any compromising information on his father or any top official in the Trump campaign.
31. "Have you and your father ever discussed the FBI's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election?" "No, not that I remember."
This is amazing to me. President Trump is absolutely fixated on Robert Mueller's investigation into the 2016 election. But, he and his eldest son NEVER had a conversation about it! Not once!

https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/16/politics/don-jr-testimony-trump-tower-meeting-2016/index.html
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,812
3,468
113
Very much so.

If the Clinton Campaign had been offered a meeting with the possibility of "dirt on Donald Trump" they would have taken it as well.
Looks like they went with manufacturing dirt on Trump.....
 

IM469

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2012
10,869
2,138
113
Very much so.

If the Clinton Campaign had been offered a meeting with the possibility of "dirt on Donald Trump" they would have taken it as well.
Yeah, bullshit ! Don't normalize Trump's team sleazeball tactics including collusion with Russians for information. It's not any different than saying everyone would rob banks /rape women / mass murder if they had a chance. Might I remind you than when President Bush's debate notes were delivered to the Democrats, they immediately turned them over to the FBI. I'm sure most Republicans (excluding Trump supporters) would do the same.

Everything that Trump campaigned against .. Obamas golf ... pay to play .. drain the swamp (hiring friends & family) .. he has done x10 and now as they end up impeached, jailed, etc .. his supporters only response is ... well everyone does it ???? :doh:
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
Another nothing burger thread. Yawn. Even the NYT is backpedaling.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,812
3,468
113
Yeah, bullshit ! Don't normalize Trump's team sleazeball tactics including collusion with Russians for information. It's not any different than saying everyone would rob banks /rape women / mass murder if they had a chance. Might I remind you than when President Bush's debate notes were delivered to the Democrats, they immediately turned them over to the FBI. I'm sure most Republicans (excluding Trump supporters) would do the same.

Everything that Trump campaigned against .. Obamas golf ... pay to play .. drain the swamp (hiring friends & family) .. he has done x10 and now as they end up impeached, jailed, etc .. his supporters only response is ... well everyone does it ???? :doh:
The dossier paid for by both the DNC and Clinton campaign proves they were willing to use foreign, including Russian sources, for dirt on Trump.

It's that simple.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,566
17,828
113
Another nothing burger thread. Yawn. Even the NYT is backpedaling.
Mueller has been reported to be now interviewing Roger Stone's associates.
That means he's getting closer to having all the answers to the questions he'll ask Stone, in prep for having all the answers to the questions he'll ask Trump.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
46,934
8,116
113
Toronto
The dossier paid for by both the DNC and Clinton campaign proves they were willing to use foreign, including Russian sources, for dirt on Trump.
If that is the case, does that mean it was proper for trump's team to work with the Russians?
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,462
5,650
113
Giuliani: 'Nothing illegal' about Trump campaign looking for Clinton dirt with Russians:

President Donald Trump's lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, said Wednesday there was nothing illegal about Trump campaign advisers meeting with a Russian lawyer purportedly offering dirt on Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

"When I ran, they were looking for dirt on me every day. That's what you do. Maybe you shouldn't. But you do it," Giuliani told Fox News' "The Ingraham Angle." "There is nothing illegal about that. Even if it comes from a Russian or a German or American, it doesn't matter."
"They never used (the collusion charge). They rejected it. If there was collusion with the Russians, they would have used it," he added.

The comments come the same day that the Senate Judiciary Committee released transcripts from Russians, Trump campaign advisers and other witnesses present at the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting. The documents shed new light on how Donald Trump Jr. and senior members of the Trump campaign were eager to obtain damaging information on Clinton — and how frustrated and angry they were that the material did not come to fruition.

Giuliani, whose comments also came on the eve of the one-year anniversary of special counsel Robert Mueller's probe into the Trump campaign, called for Mueller to wrap up his investigation.

"The President can't disclose more than he knows," Giuliani said. "We are very comfortable with it and Mueller should bring this to a close. It's been a year, 1.4 million documents and interviewed 28 witnesses and he has nothing. Which is why he wants to bring the President to an interview."

Trump's counsel also said that though his team has been open to a sit-down interview between the President and Mueller, he doesn't think any new information will be uncovered.
"Tell us what you have to get from an interview that you don't already have. He has all of the facts to make a decision," Giuliani said of Mueller.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/17/politics/rudy-giuliani-campaign-dirt/index.html

From "no collusion" to now "nothing wrong with looking for Clinton Dirt", shows how much these liars are now moving the goal posts.
Then they are trying to protect the dingbat of a POTUS from getting indicted.
Yes, the Trumptard Cult Followers believe all these lies and now state that there is nothing wrong with it. Really??
Anyway far cry from the "Jail Her Chants" that these Trumptard Cult Followers seem to have bought from their cult leader.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,462
5,650
113
So then there was nothing 'wrong' or 'illegal' about the funding of the Trump Piss Dossier.
Absolutely and spewed out of Donnie boy's own Attorney or whatever he likes to call him!!
Yet Fox New's Hannity blah blahs it on a daily basis!!
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,812
3,468
113
If that is the case, does that mean it was proper for trump's team to work with the Russians?
Depends. Is the dossier is fair game then yes so is this.

But if the dossier is not and an investigation and charges come against Clinton I will happily see Trump thrown under the bus.

That's the point. Either it's one or the other.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,812
3,468
113
So then there was nothing 'wrong' or 'illegal' about the funding of the Trump Piss Dossier.
Apparently. That's the point. Are you willing to give up Clinton to investigation to get Trump?

It's either both are good or both are bad.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,812
3,468
113
Giuliani: 'Nothing illegal' about Trump campaign looking for Clinton dirt with Russians:

President Donald Trump's lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, said Wednesday there was nothing illegal about Trump campaign advisers meeting with a Russian lawyer purportedly offering dirt on Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

"When I ran, they were looking for dirt on me every day. That's what you do. Maybe you shouldn't. But you do it," Giuliani told Fox News' "The Ingraham Angle." "There is nothing illegal about that. Even if it comes from a Russian or a German or American, it doesn't matter."
"They never used (the collusion charge). They rejected it. If there was collusion with the Russians, they would have used it," he added.

The comments come the same day that the Senate Judiciary Committee released transcripts from Russians, Trump campaign advisers and other witnesses present at the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting. The documents shed new light on how Donald Trump Jr. and senior members of the Trump campaign were eager to obtain damaging information on Clinton — and how frustrated and angry they were that the material did not come to fruition.

Giuliani, whose comments also came on the eve of the one-year anniversary of special counsel Robert Mueller's probe into the Trump campaign, called for Mueller to wrap up his investigation.

"The President can't disclose more than he knows," Giuliani said. "We are very comfortable with it and Mueller should bring this to a close. It's been a year, 1.4 million documents and interviewed 28 witnesses and he has nothing. Which is why he wants to bring the President to an interview."

Trump's counsel also said that though his team has been open to a sit-down interview between the President and Mueller, he doesn't think any new information will be uncovered.
"Tell us what you have to get from an interview that you don't already have. He has all of the facts to make a decision," Giuliani said of Mueller.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/17/politics/rudy-giuliani-campaign-dirt/index.html

From "no collusion" to now "nothing wrong with looking for Clinton Dirt", shows how much these liars are now moving the goal posts.
Then they are trying to protect the dingbat of a POTUS from getting indicted.
Yes, the Trumptard Cult Followers believe all these lies and now state that there is nothing wrong with it. Really??
Anyway far cry from the "Jail Her Chants" that these Trumptard Cult Followers seem to have bought from their cult leader.
As noted above. Take your pick. Both candidates did bad things. Or both are in the clear.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
46,934
8,116
113
Toronto
Depends. Is the dossier is fair game then yes so is this.

But if the dossier is not and an investigation and charges come against Clinton I will happily see Trump thrown under the bus.

That's the point. Either it's one or the other.
I'll go for option number two. I have no problem if they open a second investigation because if something is improper for one it is improper for another. However, if for some reason they do not open a second investigation, that is not justification for shutting down Mueller. Each case is an independent entity.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts