2 years. The FBI started looking into this in June 2016. That's when Steele started shopping about the dossier to the press. And the DNC hack was even before then.One year, with 20 or so charged and how many pleading guilty?
This is still the fastest grand jury we've seen.
Mueller is getting closer to talking to Stone, by the way.
http://thehill.com/policy/national-...nas-stone-aide-in-russia-investigation-report
1 year of the Mueller investigation.2 years. The FBI started looking into this in June 2016. That's when Steele started shopping about the dossier to the press. And the DNC hack was even before then.
And still nothing related to "collusion".
Just like Israel going to the Hague. You just don't know what you are talking about. Make false claims of immanent things happening. Put up links that don't prove a thing. Post opinion pieces as fact.
2 years. And nothing.
Here is why nothing will happen. It all hinges on the DNC hack. And the FBI still hasn't accessed the servers. So anything with this won't hold up in court.1 year of the Mueller investigation.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/17/poli...ssia-investigation-special-counsel/index.html
Israel and the ICC.
https://www.icc-cpi.int/palestine
Justice is slow, but it will get there.
So you are saying that Mueller, even though his investigation is ongoing, for sure would have given us what he already has, if he had anything. He would be giving us updates as he goes along and that he would not wait until the investigation is complete before divulging anything.As oft stated. Two years in. Nothing of note.
No. What I stated in the past and continue to state us that every single intelligence agency in the world, friend or foe, and every single media outlet have all had people and resources on this one question......So you are saying that Mueller, even though his investigation is ongoing, for sure would have given us what he already has, if he had anything. He would be giving us updates as he goes along and that he would not wait until the investigation is complete before divulging anything.
Yet.No. What I stated in the past and continue to state us that every single intelligence agency in the world, friend or foe, and every single media outlet have all had people and resources on this one question......
Did Trump collude with Russia?
And despite that weight of resources no one has come up with anything substantive to say yes.
The FBI has clones of the drives.Here is why nothing will happen. It all hinges on the DNC hack. And the FBI still hasn't accessed the servers. So anything with this won't hold up in court.
Denied access. And who knows if the copies were not tampered with.The FBI has clones of the drives.
Why would you need the originals?
Try reading what I have to say. If it hadn't been found yet imo it won't be.Yet.
We know that there were multiple contacts between Trump and the Russians, as noted in the WP article in post #36.
Click on the article link to see the links to the evidence.
We know that Roger Stone was in contact with wikileaks, who leaked the Russian hacked dem emails.
We know that Stone knew in advance of the email leaks and we know that Mueller is getting closer to interviewing Stone.
We also just found out about Don Jr's attempts to gain aid from other foreign governments, which is illegal.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/19/us/politics/trump-jr-saudi-uae-nader-prince-zamel.html
And Guiliani is working hard to try to keep Trump from testifying.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/05/donald-trump-rudy-giuliani-mueller-investigation-fbi
Prove that court's wouldn't take a backup drive as evidence.Denied access. And who knows if the copies were not tampered with.
No court will allow them in as evidence.
Because they already would have been presented as evidence of a crime?Prove that court's wouldn't take a backup drive as evidence.
