Plug - I already called you out on your faux conservative playbook views on "Liberals" (post 140 or thereabouts). You're a part of the new wave of evangelically based "Conservatives" who have embraced the brand as a way to move social conservative views into the mainstream. You and the other faux conservatives will do anything in order to get elected with the fantasy of removing rights for those who scare you. Look at Trump. The man gets elected and gives a multi-Trillion dollar tax cut to the swamp which will help to ensure Trillion dollar deficits for the next decade. How is that IN ANY WAY a "cautious and measured approach". Trump did stuff like cancel TPP simply because Obama endorsed it. Then, he turns around and wants back in. How was that IN ANY WAY a "cautious and measured approach". Same with his clueless and hamfisted trade "strategies" (which is actually NO strategy at all). Trump has backed down on EVERY single trade threat. And the funniest thing is that only Trump and his dimwitted fans seem to realize that in a trade war, prices rise and in the end, nobody wins, least of all the consumer. And the elephant in the room which nobody talks about is what does China do with the U.S. dollars their trade surplus brings? THEY INVEST IN US TREASURIES THUS FUNDING THE US DEFICIT. If Trump wants options, he should get his fiscal house in order (as he promised but failed) and prepare for any potential slowdown since we are at the end of an economic cycle. Instead he spends more - putting the U.S. in a position with few options. The exact opposite of "Conservatism". But he has moved on abortion by cutting funding. So all is well, right Plug?What is laughable is the fantasy world you live in with your fantasy antagonists - "the new conservatives" (whoever that is supposed to be!). You're not seeing it, but I think you're operating on assumptions that don't stand up to any scrutiny.
Conservatism still means the same as it's always meant - a cautious, measured and discerning approach to change that is born of the idea that current norms and rules were developed over time and are based on the observation and assessment of trial and error experience. Conservative thinkers are not impressed by those who seem disinterested or dismissive of evaluating the short and long term anticipated effects of change. However, people who have conservative views about some subjects do not necessarily have conservative views about all subjects. They may not care equally about the consequences of altering rights and obligations in all matters. It is that sort of flexibility that allows conservatives and liberals to peacefully co-exist.
Conservatives believe that liberal thinking is also needed. Improvements can be made. That takes change. However, conservatives simply believe that new thinking needs to be distilled through the filter of conservative evaluation. I don't get the sense, from you or any of your fellow travelers here on TERB, of a similar awareness that both types of thinking are necessary to social evolution, which is why I think today's liberals are less tolerant of conservative thought than the opposite.
Think on that for a while before you post your next screed about "us" and "them".