Toronto Escorts

Bannon company Cambridge Analytica used Kompromat

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
70,803
69,968
113
9 Mar 2018
Revealed: Trump’s election consultants filmed saying they use bribes and sex workers to entrap politicians

An undercover investigation by Channel 4 News reveals how Cambridge Analytica secretly campaigns in elections across the world. Bosses were filmed talking about using bribes, ex-spies, fake IDs and sex workers. Senior executives at Cambridge Analytica – the data company that credits itself with Donald Trump’s presidential victory – have been secretly filmed saying they could entrap politicians in compromising situations with bribes and Ukrainian sex workers.

In an undercover investigation by Channel 4 News, the company’s chief executive Alexander Nix said the British firm secretly campaigns in elections across the world. This includes operating through a web of shadowy front companies, or by using sub-contractors.

In one exchange, when asked about digging up material on political opponents, Mr Nix said they could “send some girls around to the candidate’s house”, adding that Ukrainian girls “are very beautiful, I find that works very well”.

In another he said: “We’ll offer a large amount of money to the candidate, to finance his campaign in exchange for land for instance, we’ll have the whole thing recorded, we’ll blank out the face of our guy and we post it on the Internet.”

Offering bribes to public officials is an offence under both the UK Bribery Act and the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Cambridge Analytica operates in the UK and is registered in the United States.

The admissions were filmed at a series of meetings at London hotels over four months, between November 2017 and January 2018. An undercover reporter for Channel 4 News posed as a fixer for a wealthy client hoping to get candidates elected in Sri Lanka.

Mr Nix told our reporter: “…we’re used to operating through different vehicles, in the shadows, and I look forward to building a very long-term and secretive relationship with you.”

Along with Mr Nix, the meetings also included Mark Turnbull, the managing director of CA Political Global, and the company’s chief data officer, Dr Alex Tayler.

Mr Turnbull described how, having obtained damaging material on opponents, Cambridge Analytica can discreetly push it onto social media and the internet.

He said: “… we just put information into the bloodstream of the internet, and then, and then watch it grow, give it a little push every now and again… like a remote control. It has to happen without anyone thinking, ‘that’s propaganda’, because the moment you think ‘that’s propaganda’, the next question is, ‘who’s put that out?’.”

Mr Nix also said: “…Many of our clients don’t want to be seen to be working with a foreign company… so often we set up, if we are working then we can set up fake IDs and websites, we can be students doing research projects attached to a university, we can be tourists, there’s so many options we can look at. I have lots of experience in this.”

In the meetings, the executives boasted that Cambridge Analytica and its parent company Strategic Communications Laboratories (SCL) had worked in more than two hundred elections across the world, including Nigeria, Kenya, the Czech Republic, India and Argentina.

The company is at the centre of a scandal over its role in the harvesting of more than 50 million Facebook profiles.

Chief executive Mr Nix has also been accused of misleading a parliamentary select committee, which is now asking him to provide further information. He has denied the allegations.

Tonight, a Cambridge Analytica spokesman said: “We entirely refute any allegation that Cambridge Analytica or any of its affiliates use entrapment, bribes, or so-called “honey-traps” for any purpose whatsoever… We routinely undertake conversations with prospective clients to try to tease out any unethical or illegal intentions…”

They said: “Cambridge Analytica does not use untrue material for any purpose.”

And they insisted that opposition research and intelligence gathering, the use of subcontractors and working discreetly with clients are all common practice and legitimate.

This report is Part Two of a Channel 4 News series, ‘Data, Democracy and Dirty Tricks’, investigating Cambridge Analytica.

Part Three, on the company’s work in the United States, will be broadcast at 7pm tomorrow (Tuesday, 20 March 2018). You can watch Part One here.


https://www.channel4.com/news/cambr...x-workers-to-entrap-politicians-investigation
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,831
3,479
113
Welcome to the real world.

Funny how it's only when someone the establishment didn't like got elected it's coming out.

You don't actually think this is a new thing to Western politics do You?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,922
17,939
113
Welcome to the real world.

Funny how it's only when someone the establishment didn't like got elected it's coming out.

You don't actually think this is a new thing to Western politics do You?
You think that its ok?
Do you support politicians who do that?
 

LT56

Banned
Feb 16, 2013
1,604
1
0
Welcome to the real world.

Funny how it's only when someone the establishment didn't like got elected it's coming out.

You don't actually think this is a new thing to Western politics do You?
Whataboutism...without even having a whatabout to point at.

Weak.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,486
5,675
113
Lots of dirt to come out of this and linking Steve Bannon / Corey Lewandowski to Cambridge Analytica tactics.
Christopher Wylie confirmed that lots of the data was going back and forth with Russian involvement via Aleksandr Kogan, the Cambridge based academic.
Thanks to Christopher Wylie who decided enough is enough and decided to reveal it all.
No doubt he will be interviewed by Mueller. Very interesting conversation with Don Lemon.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,831
3,479
113
Whataboutism...without even having a whatabout to point at.

Weak.
Its not what aboutism. Stating this is the first time a campaign has used a dirty third party to do dirty work is laughable.

All these various "opposition research" firms around for so long. But this is the first?

You don't think half of Washington has dirt on the other half?

Go ahead. Expose it. I welcome it. And watch as the floodgates open on both parties.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,831
3,479
113
You think that its ok?
Do you support politicians who do that?
There isn't a single one who Belongs to the two major parties who hasn't benefited from a similar firm. Not one.

No I want the money out. But seriously to try to say only Trump did it is naive and laughable.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
47,068
8,144
113
Toronto
Its not what aboutism. Stating this is the first time a campaign has used a dirty third party to do dirty work is laughable.

All these various "opposition research" firms around for so long. But this is the first?

You don't think half of Washington has dirt on the other half?

Go ahead. Expose it. I welcome it. And watch as the floodgates open on both parties.
You've said it has been done before? Fine.

You still haven't commented whether it is right to do or wrong. What is your opinion on the practice?
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,831
3,479
113
You've said it has been done before? Fine.

You still haven't commented whether it is right to do or wrong. What is your opinion on the practice?
I believe my last line of my post and my regular criticism of lobbyists says it all.

I heard Anderson Cooper refer to it as "electronic brainwashing" and almost spit out my drink.

All they did was craft a message, collect data and target advertising. Start with blaming Google and Facebook for creating the business model and running with it. Then these guys for turning it to politics.

Feel free to create laws to prevent it.

But honestly to say they did something any different than any other demographic study, voter registration, or advertising agency, albeit on a much grander scale is disingenuous.

They were just damn good at it and elected someone considered unelectable.

So yes I'm against these tactics. As I'm against big money. Gerrymandering, party registration, and more.

But unless you are going to try to regulate social media, how do you plan to prevent it?
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
70,803
69,968
113
I believe my last line of my post and my regular criticism of lobbyists says it all.

I heard Anderson Cooper refer to it as "electronic brainwashing" and almost spit out my drink.

All they did was craft a message, collect data and target advertising. Start with blaming Google and Facebook for creating the business model and running with it. Then these guys for turning it to politics.

Feel free to create laws to prevent it.

But honestly to say they did something any different than any other demographic study, voter registration, or advertising agency, albeit on a much grander scale is disingenuous.

They were just damn good at it and elected someone considered unelectable.

So yes I'm against these tactics. As I'm against big money. Gerrymandering, party registration, and more.

But unless you are going to try to regulate social media, how do you plan to prevent it?
How about the kompromat?
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,831
3,479
113
How about the kompromat?
Was it used in the USA 2016 election?

Seems to me the allegations were made in the context of assisting with a Sri Lankan election. I have no doubt a third world nation is engaged in even worse dirty tricks then that.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,831
3,479
113

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,922
17,939
113
Toronto Escorts