Toronto Escorts

Donald Trump consultants used private info from 50 million Facebook users

Charlemagne

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2017
15,451
2,483
113
March 17, 2018 1:21 pm EST

Updated: March 17, 2018 1:24 pm EST

Donald Trump consultants used private info from 50 million Facebook users

By David Ingram and Peter Henderson
Reuters

REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Data analytics firm Cambridge Analytica harvested private information from more than 50 million Facebook users in developing techniques to support President Donald Trump‘s 2016 election campaign, the New York Times and London’s Observer reported on Saturday.

The newspapers, which cited former Cambridge Analytica employees, associates and documents, said the data breach was one of the largest in the history of Facebook Inc.

Facebook on Friday said it was suspending Cambridge Analytica after finding data privacy policies had been violated.

The Observer said Cambridge Analytica used the data, taken without authorization in early 2014, to build a software program to predict and influence choices at the ballot box.

The paper quoted Cambridge Analytica whistleblower Christopher Wylie, who worked with an academic at Cambridge University to obtain the data, as saying the system could profile individual voters to target them with personalized political advertisements.

The more than 50 million profiles represented around a third of active North American Facebook users, and nearly a quarter of potential U.S. voters, at the time, the paper said.

“We exploited Facebook to harvest millions of people’s profiles. And built models to exploit what we knew about them and target their inner demons. That was the basis that the entire company was built on,” the Observer quoted Wylie as saying.

The New York Times said interviews with a half-dozen former Cambridge Analytica employees and contractors, and a review of the firm’s emails and documents, revealed it not only relied on the private Facebook data but still possesses most or all of it.

The Observer said the data was collected through an app called thisisyourdigitallife, built by academic Aleksandr Kogan, separately from his work at Cambridge University.

Through Kogan’s company Global Science Research (GSR), in collaboration with Cambridge Analytica, hundreds of thousands of users were paid to take a personality test and agreed to have their data collected for academic use, the Observer said.

However, the app also collected the information of the test-takers’ Facebook friends, leading to the accumulation of a data pool tens of millions-strong, the paper said. It said Facebook’s “platform policy” allowed only collection of friends data to improve user experience in the app and barred it from being sold on or used for advertising.

Facebook said in a statement on Friday it had suspended Cambridge Analytica and its parent group Strategic Communication Laboratories (SCL) after receiving reports they did not delete information about Facebook users that had been inappropriately shared.

Strategic Communication Laboratories and the Trump campaign were not immediately available for comment. Facebook did not mention the Trump campaign or any other campaigns in its statement, which was attributed to the social network’s deputy general counsel, Paul Grewal. They did not immediately comment on the Times and Observer stories.

“We will take legal action if necessary to hold them responsible and accountable for any unlawful behavior,” Facebook said, adding that it was continuing to investigate the claims.

Cambridge Analytica worked for the failed presidential campaign of U.S. Senator Ted Cruz and then for Trump’s presidential campaign. On its website, it says it “provided the Donald J. Trump for President campaign with the expertise and insights that helped win the White House.”

Brad Parscale, who ran Trump’s digital ad operation in 2016 and is his 2020 re-election campaign manager, declined to comment on Friday.

In past interviews with Reuters, Parscale has said Cambridge Analytica played a minor role as a contractor in the 2016 Trump campaign, and that the campaign used voter data from a Republican-affiliated organization rather than Cambridge Analytica.

UNUSUAL STEP

Facebook’s Grewal said the company was taking the unusual step of announcing the suspension “given the public prominence” of Cambridge Analytica and its parent organization.

The suspension means Cambridge Analytica and SCL cannot buy ads on the world’s largest social media network or administer pages belonging to clients, Andrew Bosworth, a Facebook vice president, said in a Twitter post.

Trump’s campaign hired Cambridge Analytica in June 2016 and paid it more than $6.2 million, according to Federal Election Commission records.

Cambridge Analytica says it uses “behavioral microtargeting,” or combining analysis of people’s personalities with demographics, to predict and influence mass behavior. It says it has data on 220 million Americans, two-thirds of the U.S. population.

It has worked on other campaigns in the United States and other countries, and it is funded by Robert Mercer, a prominent supporter of politically conservative groups.

Facebook in its statement described a rocky relationship with Cambridge Analytica and two individuals going back to 2015.

That year, Facebook said, it learned that Kogan, the Cambridge University professor, lied to the company and violated its policies by sharing data that he acquired with a so-called “research app” that used Facebook’s login system.

Kogan was not immediately available for comment.

The app was downloaded by about 270,000 people. Facebook said Kogan gained access to profile and other information “in a legitimate way” but “he did not subsequently abide by our rules” when he passed the data to SCL/Cambridge Analytica and Wylie of Eunoia Technologies.

http://bit.ly/2FZU1Ir. Eunoia did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Facebook said it cut ties to Kogan’s app when it learned of the violation in 2015, and asked for certification from Kogan and all parties he had given data to that the information had been destroyed.

Although all certified they had destroyed the data, Facebook said it received reports in the past several days that “not all data was deleted,” prompting the suspension announced on Friday.

https://globalnews.ca/news/4089282/donald-trump-consultants-private-info-facebook-users/
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,644
17,845
113
Cambridge Analytica is also in trouble from an ABC doc that said they'd set up politicians with SP's and bribes to use against them.
Nice company, Trump.
 

SuperCharge

Banned
Jun 11, 2011
2,523
1
0
Where have you all been? Facebook has been mining data for years and years. Same thing happened with Obama accept when he did it, he was praised for it. Bunch of hypocrites.

Leaked WikiLeaks as far back as 2015
Hillary Clinton worried as early as Jan 2015 that Facebook open-sourcing Artificial Intelligence might "affect our plans"
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/37147
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
Where have you all been? Facebook has been mining data for years and years. Same thing happened with Obama accept when he did it, he was praised for it. Bunch of hypocrites.

Leaked WikiLeaks as far back as 2015
Hillary Clinton worried as early as Jan 2015 that Facebook open-sourcing Artificial Intelligence might "affect our plans"
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/37147
Exactly! I remember the NYT praising Obama's team for the social network ingesting. It was a new and revolutionary way to reach and find votes. But, that was then...
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,644
17,845
113
Exactly! I remember the NYT praising Obama's team for the social network ingesting. It was a new and revolutionary way to reach and find votes. But, that was then...
That was before Cambridge Analytica stored and used the data from 50 million facebook users.
They went too far and hopefully they do something about both of those companies.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
That was before Cambridge Analytica stored and used the data from 50 million facebook users.
They went too far and hopefully they do something about both of those companies.
whatever
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
70,646
69,642
113
Cambridge Analytica is also linked to the Mercers, Bannon and Erik Prince, among others.

Looks like the swamp just went all social media!!
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,812
3,468
113
Cambridge Analytica is also linked to the Mercers, Bannon and Erik Prince, among others.

Looks like the swamp just went all social media!!

So What?
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
If any one word embraced the Trump supporter's views on facts - that has to be it.
What facts? The fact that the anti Trumpites are having a stroke over the same thing they were cheering when Obama did it? Hence, "whatever". Of course that's still more elegant than making an ass of yourself feigning outrage.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,644
17,845
113
What facts? The fact that the anti Trumpites are having a stroke over the same thing they were cheering when Obama did it? Hence, "whatever". Of course that's still more elegant than making an ass of yourself feigning outrage.
Nobody has claimed that Obama kept the personal details from Facebook on 50 million americans.
Big difference.

All Obama did was advertise, there is no talk of data mining and psychometrics.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
Nobody has claimed that Obama kept the personal details from Facebook on 50 million americans.
Big difference.

All Obama did was advertise, there is no talk of data mining and psychometrics.
Patently false.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,812
3,468
113
Nobody has claimed that Obama kept the personal details from Facebook on 50 million americans.
Big difference.

All Obama did was advertise, there is no talk of data mining and psychometrics.
Find the Ted Talks on YouTube.

How exactly do you think the advertising was targeted? That's the business model. Facebook datamines all the time. It's how they make money.

The dems say who they want the advertising to target. Facebook uses data mining and pschometrics to do it.

Cambridge took the study and "macrocosmed" it. But used Facebook's own methods and their approval.

And paid them as well.

Its all advertising. It's just Cambridge did it better.
 

b4u

Active member
Jul 23, 2010
1,790
10
38
In related news...

Damaging Wikileaks Email Shows Zuckerberg Met With Hillary Campaign Chair Podesta Before Election

Mark Zuckerberg’s claims this week that Facebook was fair to Donald Trump during the 2016 election just took another serious blow.

The Facebook founder and CEO personally met with Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta a year before the 2016 election, according to an email released by Wikileaks.

The news comes a day after Wikileaks’ Julian Assange dropped a bomb onto the heads of Zuckerberg and Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg, alleging they colluded with Hillary Clinton’s 2016 election campaign.

Assange Tweeted Thursday, linking the emails sent back and forth between John Podesta and Sandberg which reveal Sandberg wanted Clinton to win “badly.” Assange said the women met privately numerous times during Clinton’s campaign.

Assange included one email from Sandberg to Podesta, Clinton’s campaign manager, which is particularly damaging in which the Facebook executive pledged to help elect Clinton.

Now comes a newer revelation from Assange which clearly shows Podesta met privately with Zuckerberg on at least one occasion leading up to the 2016 presidential election.

True Pundit reported Wednesday the FBI is ramping up a larger investigation of Zuckerberg’s Facebook to probe a broad scheme likely waged by the social media giant aimed at electing Clinton.



tweet from Assange https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/913552409741479936
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,812
3,468
113
Just watching Zuckerberg on CNN.

He just said the Russians didn't so much try to Influence for or against a candidate as to try to sow dissent in the populace.

Right from the horses mouth.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,644
17,845
113
Just watching Zuckerberg on CNN.

He just said the Russians didn't so much try to Influence for or against a candidate as to try to sow dissent in the populace.

Right from the horses mouth.
Do you think he'd come out and say that he sold millions of ads to Russians that might have effected a very close election?
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,462
5,654
113
I watched bits and pieces of the interview, but I did not hear anything about the "Russians didn't so much try to Influence for or against a candidate as to try to sow dissent in the populace."
I clearly heard this statement:

Zuckerberg: Facebook may have influenced election, may need to be regulated.

In a flurry of media interviews on Wednesday, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said "he is willing to testify before Congress, that he can't guarantee that Russians didn't get their hands on Facebook user data and that he isn't sure Facebook shouldn't be regulated.Wired asks "How confident are you that Facebook data didn’t get into the hands of Russian operatives—into the Internet Research Agency, or even into other groups that we may not have found yet?"
I can’t really say that. I hope that we will know that more certainly after we do an audit.
He told Recode he is open to testifying before Congress — if he is the right Facebook executive to do so.
I’m open to doing that... We actually do this fairly regularly ... There are lots of different topics that Congress needs and wants to know about, and the way that we approach it is that our responsibility is to make sure that they have access to all of the information that they need to have.
CNN: Do you believe Facebook impacted the 2016 election?
That is hard. It's really hard for me to have a full assessment of that.
CNN: Given the stakes, why shouldn't Facebook be regulated?
I actually am not sure we shouldn't be regulated.
He also finally apologized, in the Recode interview.
We let the community down and I feel really bad and I’m sorry about that.
In the New York Times interview (and he made a similar point on CNN), Zuckerberg painted the issues as hard to foresee."

https://www.axios.com/what-we-are-l...156-f97a3258-e098-4201-85f0-617822429465.html
 
Toronto Escorts