Dunno - I think many members of the legal community would disagree, along with any women who's ever protested against male-only clubs/organizations. And I've already stated you can either cut the gym in half and have men only and female only halves or you can make it a coed gym with a small section that is female only, as is the case already in some existing Goodlife locations.
Can you explain what's the difference between this and say Augusta National? I'm sure there's plenty of other golf courses around and having access to a golf course also isn't a human rights issue.
All I'm pointing it out is a clear double standard. Something like this would not be allowed if it discriminated against anyone else based on the Human Rights Code posted. Can't say "We do not service EI's but since there's taxis/Uber/Lyft, there's other options".
